Can We Safeguard Our Democracy After McCutcheon?

[xchrom]

http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/can-we-safeguard-our-democracy-after-mccutcheon



The Supreme Court’s evisceration of our campaign finance rules is a powerful argument for the cleansing properties of sunlight. We should respond to McCutcheon by pushing for the full and timely disclosure of every penny donated to advance a political agenda.

If America’s wealthiest can offer unlimited dollars to shape our politics, the least we can do is force them to own their activism. It’s time to get rid of the loopholes for sham “social welfare” organizations and trade groups. It’s time to wipe out the dark money, and force those wealthy few to publicly stand behind their positions.

That’s not only a good and timely idea – it may also be the only viable tool we have left to protect our democracy, at least for the foreseeable future.

When the Supreme Court handed down its decision in McCutcheon, Sam Steiner, a fellow at Yale Law School, wrote that the court’s conservatives have “no idea how money works in politics.” It’s a common criticism. As Justice Stephen Breyer noted in his dissent in McCutcheon, the conservative bloc’s decision in the case rested “upon its own, not a record-based, view of the facts.”

[WinkyDink]

1. ..the court’s conservatives have “no idea how money works in politics.” ~~~They most decidedly DO

know!

HENCE, THE DECISION!!

[IDemo]

2. As much as I agree with the rest of the piece

I'm left puzzled with that assertion. Of course they know.