Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MountainLaurel

(10,271 posts)
Mon May 5, 2014, 09:28 PM May 2014

Bill directing physicians to keep alive pregnant women for sake of fetus flies through LA House

95-0 vote. Let that sink in for a second. No Louisiana house members would stand up for a woman's right to bodily autonomy once she is on life support.

At-a-Glance: A bill that would order physicians in Louisiana to try to keep alive pregnant women who become medically incapacitated if the fetus has a viable chance at live birth advanced out of the Louisiana House Monday (May 5) by a unanimous vote.

If adopted into law, the state's order to keep the mother alive for the sake of the fetus would supersede wishes of the family and of the mother's will after 20 weeks of pregnancy, unless the will specified "do not resuscitate" while pregnant.

The bill: Senate Bill 1274, sponsored by Rep. Austin Badon, D-New Orleans, says if a doctor determines that a woman's life can "reasonably be maintained" and the fetus will continue to develop and be viable, then measures are supposed to be taken to keep her alive though life support, for example, until the child is born.

The debate: Badon said he sponsored the bill to give a voice to unborn children, noting many wills don't specify advance directives for life support preferences in the event of pregnancy. The bill would allow the state, under the opinion and care of the attending doctor, to make those decisions when ambiguity otherwise exists. He said a will would have to specify life support preferences in the event of pregnancy in order for them to be valid.


http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2014/05/pregnant_life_support_louisian.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bill directing physicians to keep alive pregnant women for sake of fetus flies through LA House (Original Post) MountainLaurel May 2014 OP
Ya gotta wonder who's gonna pay for that! peace13 May 2014 #1
Considering the state of healthcare here MountainLaurel May 2014 #2
and the war on women continues apace niyad May 2014 #3
This bill was sponsored by a Democrat? dem in texas May 2014 #4
He's definitely a Dem MountainLaurel May 2014 #5
Badon doesn't realize that advance directives do NOT belong in wills? csziggy May 2014 #6
Probably not MountainLaurel May 2014 #13
Women officially nothing more now than incubators theHandpuppet May 2014 #7
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2014 #8
And if the child has no father or other family members, who's going raise it? MrScorpio May 2014 #9
who the hell cares-the anti choice bastard job ends at birth dembotoz May 2014 #12
But, but, isn't that the government coming between you and your doctor? tanyev May 2014 #10
disgusting. PeaceNikki May 2014 #11
 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
1. Ya gotta wonder who's gonna pay for that!
Mon May 5, 2014, 09:35 PM
May 2014

The team that denies women healthcare wants to keep a corpse 'alive' to birth an uninsured baby. Boy these guys are gutless wonders! Maybe the church can pay the bill...and raise the baby!

dem in texas

(2,674 posts)
4. This bill was sponsored by a Democrat?
Mon May 5, 2014, 10:12 PM
May 2014

It this right, it is crazy. All of this is because of the woman who was kept alive over in Ft.Worth against her family's wishes. The husband tried to have her taken off life support, said you could smell death on her. The hospital finally found the fetus was severely deformed and let her die. I felt so sorry for the family being put through all that just to satisfy some religious right wingers. this is family stuff and everyone else should stay out of it.

MountainLaurel

(10,271 posts)
5. He's definitely a Dem
Mon May 5, 2014, 11:57 PM
May 2014

Meanwhile, the rest of Louisiana Dems either voted for it or left the room to take a call or such so they'd be marked as Absent, including my chickenshit rep. His district is reliably blue, but the Louisiana Family Forum runs the legislature. I'd have more respect for my rep if he'd voted for the bill.

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
6. Badon doesn't realize that advance directives do NOT belong in wills?
Tue May 6, 2014, 12:06 AM
May 2014

"The debate: Badon said he sponsored the bill to give a voice to unborn children, noting many wills don't specify advance directives for life support preferences in the event of pregnancy. The bill would allow the state, under the opinion and care of the attending doctor, to make those decisions when ambiguity otherwise exists. He said a will would have to specify life support preferences in the event of pregnancy in order for them to be valid."

First, a will is not valid until the person is dead. Advance directives need to be consulted before that point. Perhaps he meant a living will but what he said does not indicate that.

For more info: http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/living-wills

MountainLaurel

(10,271 posts)
13. Probably not
Tue May 6, 2014, 10:34 AM
May 2014

From what I gather listening to some advocates who have spoken to him on the issue, his only concern is saving "babies." He doesn't give a flying fuck about the costs, the legality, the ethical issues involved.

Response to MountainLaurel (Original post)

MrScorpio

(73,631 posts)
9. And if the child has no father or other family members, who's going raise it?
Tue May 6, 2014, 05:55 AM
May 2014

The State prepared for that eventuality?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bill directing physicians...