Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Tue May 6, 2014, 05:38 PM May 2014

South Florida student says teacher won't let him read Bible in class

LAUDERDALE LAKES, Fla. -

Giovanni Rubeo, a fifth-grade student at Park Lakes Elementary School in Lauderdale Lakes, said Monday he wants to be able to read his Bible during free reading period in class.

"The Bible gives you a lot of wisdom, especially the Book of Prophets," Giovanni told WPLG-TV.

Giovanni said his teacher won't let him, even leaving a voicemail for his father.

"I noticed that he has a book -- a religious book -- in the classroom," his teacher said in the voicemail. "He's not permitted to read those books in my classroom."

A letter from the school's principal said he can read his Bible before and after school and during lunch, which the Rubeo family said violates their civil rights.


http://www.clickorlando.com/news/south-florida-student-says-teacher-wont-let-him-read-bible-in-class/25840672?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

67 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
South Florida student says teacher won't let him read Bible in class (Original Post) The Straight Story May 2014 OP
Unless they have a list of books they are supposed to read from during this hour dilby May 2014 #1
Looks like this good Christian family lied.... msanthrope May 2014 #11
This quote from the OP sees it differently. Keefer May 2014 #19
Excuse me? The child can read the Bible during lunch, before and after school, and during free msanthrope May 2014 #35
Your assertion contradicts the article Ms. Toad May 2014 #45
It wan't really free reading time gollygee May 2014 #47
Thanks. Ms. Toad May 2014 #52
My assertion does not contradict the Herald article, which has been cited repeatedly msanthrope May 2014 #57
message DustyJoe May 2014 #58
It isn't clear who you think it would be problematic for Ms. Toad May 2014 #59
Not surprised in the least...nt SidDithers May 2014 #39
Well Dorian Gray May 2014 #41
I doubt it gollygee May 2014 #2
This is going to show up on every right wing fundies exboyfil May 2014 #3
I wonder if LiberalElite May 2014 #38
Let me take my science book to church Laf.La.Dem. May 2014 #4
More information el_bryanto May 2014 #5
Yes, our school did accelerated reading years ago. charmay May 2014 #23
I'm suprised he made it through this part before putting it down LOL snooper2 May 2014 #6
So much for reading the bible and believing every word without question: VERY DANGEROUS! YOHABLO May 2014 #21
Well, I'm curious what Bible he's reading that has the "Book of Prophets" sweetloukillbot May 2014 #26
It is a common way to refer Ms. Toad May 2014 #46
I went to Sunday school and church nearly every sunday as a child and taught adult sunday School for left is right May 2014 #61
I've been in a less biblically based faith community Ms. Toad May 2014 #62
I understand that - but it's basically saying "My favorite book is most of the Old Testament" sweetloukillbot May 2014 #64
Depends on whether you are talking about the minor prophets, or the major ones. Ms. Toad May 2014 #65
If the kid isn't disrupting the class, who cares? nt Ruby the Liberal May 2014 #7
Because it wasn't a free-reading period. msanthrope May 2014 #8
... and the devil (as they say) lurks in the details Ruby the Liberal May 2014 #15
Looks like they have taken up the Fred Phelps litigation method... VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #53
Represented by the Liberty Institute tammywammy May 2014 #9
Evidently free readinig period isn't so free. n/t Skip Intro May 2014 #10
It wasn't a free-reading period....the good Christian family lied.... msanthrope May 2014 #12
It wasn't free reading time gollygee May 2014 #13
What exactly is accelerated reading time? NobodyHere May 2014 #22
Info here: gollygee May 2014 #24
Thanks NobodyHere May 2014 #25
I think the teacher is taking the wrong approach. immoderate May 2014 #14
The teacher is taking the absolutely right approach to deal with this lying student. nt msanthrope May 2014 #16
Did he later grow up and Politicalboi May 2014 #28
How do you think I knew which chapter to send him to? immoderate May 2014 #32
Did he Turn, Turn, Turn the pages? DemocraticWing May 2014 #66
all that illicit sex in the bible must be interesting to a 5th grader nt msongs May 2014 #17
Fundamentalist fake outrage. charmay May 2014 #18
My kid got in trouble for reading books Nevernose May 2014 #20
The Bible's not on the AR list, and this was during AR reading time. knitter4democracy May 2014 #27
They do have AR ratings for various books in the Bible exboyfil May 2014 #33
It's more complicated than that gollygee May 2014 #49
True, but it probably wasn't what was best for the student. knitter4democracy May 2014 #67
If the kid can pass the test without reading in class Politicalboi May 2014 #29
If that's what he wants to 840high May 2014 #30
That's not how the AR program works gollygee May 2014 #50
Maybe parents need help with reading comprehension Ilsa May 2014 #31
For some reason I'm reminded of the young man SheilaT May 2014 #34
Maybe he was apologizing to God for being a dumbass? NT Adrahil May 2014 #37
"Accelerated reader?" Adrahil May 2014 #36
The AR program supposedly helps all kids increase their reading level gollygee May 2014 #42
Yes, I understand the program.... Adrahil May 2014 #43
Occasionally kids repeat a grade. Mariana May 2014 #60
Unless he's supposed Dorian Gray May 2014 #40
Read the article.... Adrahil May 2014 #44
I realized that as I read further down the thread. Dorian Gray May 2014 #54
Roger that! Have a great day! NT Adrahil May 2014 #56
Free reading time isn't so free after all Capt. Obvious May 2014 #48
ROFL gollygee May 2014 #51
Was he using it to determine the value of pi? JoePhilly May 2014 #55
"The bible is a book with some beautiful poetry, a bloodstained history, a wealth of obscenity, and Tierra_y_Libertad May 2014 #63

dilby

(2,273 posts)
1. Unless they have a list of books they are supposed to read from during this hour
Tue May 6, 2014, 05:41 PM
May 2014

he should be able to read his book.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
11. Looks like this good Christian family lied....
Tue May 6, 2014, 05:56 PM
May 2014

Broward school officials rejected the accusation, saying the student wasn’t asking to read the Bible during a free-reading session but during a classroom “accelerated reading’’ program. The district says it allows Bibles to be included in free-reading periods — this just wasn’t one of them.

In a statement, the Broward school district said it “respects and upholds the rights of students to bring personal religious materials to school, including the Bible, and to read these items before school, after school or during any ‘free reading’ time during the school day. This information has been communicated to the parents of the student involved in this situation.”

Representing the Rubeo family is the Liberty Institute, which bills itself as “the largest legal organization dedicated solely to defending and restoring religious liberty in America.” The conservative group launched a similar protest against a Texas school district last month — in that instance, it was a second-grader who was allegedly not allowed to read the Bible.

The Texas school district also said it could not substantiate that the Bible incident really happened. Also last month, a Central Florida school district found no evidence of another Liberty Institute complaint alleging that a school official told a 5-year-old girl to stop praying during lunch.

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2014/05/05/4099850/group-charging-schools-with-religious.html#storylink=cpy

Keefer

(713 posts)
19. This quote from the OP sees it differently.
Tue May 6, 2014, 07:15 PM
May 2014

"A letter from the school's principal said he can read his Bible before and after school and during lunch, which the Rubeo family said violates their civil rights."

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
35. Excuse me? The child can read the Bible during lunch, before and after school, and during free
Wed May 7, 2014, 06:16 AM
May 2014

reading times.

The child was not in a free reading time when told to put the book away. I think you miss the point.

Ms. Toad

(34,085 posts)
45. Your assertion contradicts the article
Wed May 7, 2014, 08:31 AM
May 2014

The article is not specific as to when the child was told to put the book away. He says he wants to be able to read it during free reading time - but the letter and voice mail from the school to his parents said he could only read it during lunch, before, and after school.

The school board statement included free reading time. No indication, though, about whether the school board statement was issued after the incident - or as a reminder to a misbehaving school/teacher.

If their assertions are correct (that he was told he could not read it during free reading time), that's a problem - and the school/teacher should apologize.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
47. It wan't really free reading time
Wed May 7, 2014, 08:58 AM
May 2014

You'll see a lot of the articles put "free reading" in quotation marks because they're choosing to interpret it that way to promote their agenda, but it was a period where kids could pick their own books to read - only so long as those books were part of the Accelerated Reader program. That isn't precisely "free reading" time. The family, and some news organizations apparently, are distorting the truth by not making that clear.

The following article includes that information. I don't know if other news organizations are intentionally not explaining it or were just lazy and got the story from someone else who left it out.

http://www.miamiherald.com/2014/05/06/4101611/broward-schools-runcie-says-bible.html

Ms. Toad

(34,085 posts)
52. Thanks.
Wed May 7, 2014, 09:23 AM
May 2014

I was going by the article linked to - which described it essentially as a conflict between policy and implementation.

But even the article you linked to includes a quote which makes me wonder what actually went on, "A voicemail left by Giovanni’s teacher last month further fueled the controversy. A recording of the message, which was left for Giovanni’s father, includes the teacher stating “I noticed that he has a book — a religious book — in the classroom. He’s not permitted to read those books in my classroom.”

If that is a transcription of the voice mail (as opposed to a paraphrase), that would seem to support the family's version. I'd be pissed too if my daughter was barred from reading a book during free reading period just because the teacher didn't approve of its content. I can just hear the phone message - which would likely get rapid condemnation on DU: "“I noticed that she has a book — a lesbian book — in the classroom. She’s not permitted to read those books in my classroom.”

Although I don't support their current request (that he be allowed to read a book not on the accelerated reading list during accelerated reading), it still isn't clear to me what happened initially,and even if it is - the teacher's message (again, if it is a transcript) is troubling.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
57. My assertion does not contradict the Herald article, which has been cited repeatedly
Wed May 7, 2014, 10:16 AM
May 2014

on this thread, and which is more fully-fleshed, delving into the outright lying that is going on.

The school was specific as to when the Bible was not allowed--- during the accelerated reading time.

My suggestion to you is that you read the helpful article that el_bryanto provided, which debunks the family's claims.

DustyJoe

(849 posts)
58. message
Wed May 7, 2014, 10:44 AM
May 2014

The voicemail will be problematic legally
.
"I noticed that he has a book -- a religious book -- in the classroom," his teacher said in the voicemail. "He's not permitted to read those books in my classroom."
.
It refers to no assigned reading times and instead points out the personal view of the teacher herself with the 'no religious books in MY classroom'. It didn't refer to the student actually reading the book, only 'I NOTICED he has a book'. So outwardly it would appear a pre-emptive attempt from the teacher that he cannot bring the book at all even for lunchtime or free reading times.

Ms. Toad

(34,085 posts)
59. It isn't clear who you think it would be problematic for
Wed May 7, 2014, 11:01 AM
May 2014

but in terms of assessing which party is telling the truth, it supports the family's contention (based on your last sentence - which is the same way I interpret it).

The only two voices from the actual incident I have seen reported are the teacher's (making a general ban on religious books), and the student's - saying he was prohibited from reading the book during free reading time. Everyone else is giving their interpretation of an event at which they were not present.

Going forward, the school board has made their policy clear - that the Bible may be read during free reading time. Whatever happened in the past, that is an appropriate position for the school to take. The teacher may - or may not - have been implementing that policy prior to this incident.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
2. I doubt it
Tue May 6, 2014, 05:43 PM
May 2014

There's some church in my area that has everyone who goes to the church carry Bibles around with them everywhere. I do mean everywhere. My daughter has talked about a few kids in her school who carry their Bibles around to every class. The area this happened at is very likely more religious than where I am, and I would be surprised if a teacher found it so unusual for a student to have a Bible. I guess I'm suspicious about this. Was he reading it out loud or otherwise disrupting class time? Reading it when they're doing other class work? People pushing for religion in schools sometimes misrepresent what actually happened.

exboyfil

(17,865 posts)
3. This is going to show up on every right wing fundies
Tue May 6, 2014, 05:45 PM
May 2014

Facebook for months. The ACLU and other organizations have published a document which covers this issue.

1. Students have the right to pray individually or in groups or to discuss their religious views with their peers so long as they are not disruptive. Because the Establishment Clause does not apply to purely private speech, students enjoy the right to read their Bibles or other scriptures

https://www.aclu.org/religion-belief/joint-statement-current-law-religion-public-schools

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
38. I wonder if
Wed May 7, 2014, 07:03 AM
May 2014

he did read the Bible in class just to get the reaction that they wanted. In other words, someone put him up to it.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
5. More information
Tue May 6, 2014, 05:46 PM
May 2014
Broward school officials rejected the accusation, saying the student wasn’t asking to read the Bible during a free-reading session but during a classroom “accelerated reading’’ program. The district says it allows Bibles to be included in free-reading periods — this just wasn’t one of them.

From the Miami Herald.

My guess is that during accelerated reading time you are required to read from an approved reading list.

Bryant

charmay

(525 posts)
23. Yes, our school did accelerated reading years ago.
Tue May 6, 2014, 07:39 PM
May 2014

Certain books were marked that the student would read and then take a computerized test. I think that the test was part of their reading grade.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
6. I'm suprised he made it through this part before putting it down LOL
Tue May 6, 2014, 05:48 PM
May 2014

1 This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him;

2 male and female created he them; Mt. 19.4 · Mk. 10.6 and blessed them, Gen. 1.27, 28 and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created.

3 And Adam lived a hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth:

4 and the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters:

5 and all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years: and he died.

6 ¶ And Seth lived a hundred and five years, and begat Enos:

7 and Seth lived after he begat Enos eight hundred and seven years, and begat sons and daughters:

8 and all the days of Seth were nine hundred and twelve years: and he died.

9 ¶ And Enos lived ninety years, and begat Ca-i'nan:

10 and Enos lived after he begat Ca-i'nan eight hundred and fifteen years, and begat sons and daughters:

11 and all the days of Enos were nine hundred and five years: and he died.

12 ¶ And Ca-i'nan lived seventy years, and begat Mahal'aleel:

13 and Ca-i'nan lived after he begat Mahal'aleel eight hundred and forty years, and begat sons and daughters:

14 and all the days of Ca-i'nan were nine hundred and ten years: and he died.

15 ¶ And Mahal'aleel lived sixty and five years, and begat Jared:

16 and Mahal'aleel lived after he begat Jared eight hundred and thirty years, and begat sons and daughters:

17 and all the days of Mahal'aleel were eight hundred ninety and five years: and he died.

18 ¶ And Jared lived a hundred sixty and two years, and he begat Enoch:

19 and Jared lived after he begat Enoch eight hundred years, and begat sons and daughters:

20 and all the days of Jared were nine hundred sixty and two years: and he died.

21 ¶ And Enoch lived sixty and five years, and begat Methu'selah:

22 and Enoch walked with God after he begat Methu'selah three hundred years, and begat sons and daughters:

23 and all the days of Enoch were three hundred sixty and five years:

24 and Enoch Heb. 11.5 walked with God: and he was not; for God took him.

25 ¶ And Methu'selah lived a hundred eighty and seven years, and begat Lamech:

26 and Methu'selah lived after he begat Lamech seven hundred eighty and two years, and begat sons and daughters:

27 and all the days of Methu'selah were nine hundred sixty and nine years: and he died.

28 ¶ And Lamech lived a hundred eighty and two years, and begat a son:

29 and he called his name Noah, 6 saying, This same shall comfort us concerning our work and toil of our hands, because of the ground which the LORD hath cursed.

30 And Lamech lived after he begat Noah five hundred ninety and five years, and begat sons and daughters:

31 and all the days of Lamech were seven hundred seventy and seven years: and he died.

32 ¶ And Noah was five hundred years old: and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth.




What does a 500 year old man look like anyway?





sweetloukillbot

(11,054 posts)
26. Well, I'm curious what Bible he's reading that has the "Book of Prophets"
Tue May 6, 2014, 09:49 PM
May 2014

Don't recall that being included...

Ms. Toad

(34,085 posts)
46. It is a common way to refer
Wed May 7, 2014, 08:44 AM
May 2014

to the prophetic chapters in the Bible (Isaiah, Jeremiah, Lamentations, Ezekiel, Daniel, Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi)

left is right

(1,665 posts)
61. I went to Sunday school and church nearly every sunday as a child and taught adult sunday School for
Wed May 7, 2014, 11:20 AM
May 2014

2 decades. I have never heard anyone refer to these individual books as the book of the prophets. Book of Isaiah...yes; book of Jeremiah...yes. Even the tiny book of Obadiah. If the kid can’t get this right when asked about reading the Bible, I would say that this is probably more about “fred Phelps” litigation than real violation of religious liberty

Ms. Toad

(34,085 posts)
62. I've been in a less biblically based faith community
Wed May 7, 2014, 02:28 PM
May 2014

for my entire life - and it is a familiar reference to me.

From Judaism, Catholics, Methodist (a slight variation - Four Profits Major and Twelve Prophets Minor)

It is part of the standard classification scheme for grouping books in the bible

It has been a long time since I have opened a Bible - but I seem to recall those groupings from the bible my church gave me when I turned 12.

That says nothing about the motives of the family - just that the reference the child used is not an indication that he doesn't have a clue about the Bible - quite the contrary.

sweetloukillbot

(11,054 posts)
64. I understand that - but it's basically saying "My favorite book is most of the Old Testament"
Wed May 7, 2014, 02:59 PM
May 2014

Maybe the reporter got it wrong - I wouldn't be surprised. But I wouldn't say I like "the book of Prophets" - I'd say I like the book of Micah, or the prophetic books.

Ms. Toad

(34,085 posts)
65. Depends on whether you are talking about the minor prophets, or the major ones.
Wed May 7, 2014, 03:50 PM
May 2014

The major prophets are only 4-5 books.

And - it's expecting a lot of a 10 year old to base your skepticism that he is actually reading the bible on the fact that he doesn't phrase it precisely the way you would (especially when there is a lot of variation among very well educated religious folks about the precise phrasing).

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
8. Because it wasn't a free-reading period.
Tue May 6, 2014, 05:52 PM
May 2014

Broward school officials rejected the accusation, saying the student wasn’t asking to read the Bible during a free-reading session but during a classroom “accelerated reading’’ program. The district says it allows Bibles to be included in free-reading periods — this just wasn’t one of them.

In a statement, the Broward school district said it “respects and upholds the rights of students to bring personal religious materials to school, including the Bible, and to read these items before school, after school or during any ‘free reading’ time during the school day. This information has been communicated to the parents of the student involved in this situation.”

Representing the Rubeo family is the Liberty Institute, which bills itself as “the largest legal organization dedicated solely to defending and restoring religious liberty in America.” The conservative group launched a similar protest against a Texas school district last month — in that instance, it was a second-grader who was allegedly not allowed to read the Bible.

The Texas school district also said it could not substantiate that the Bible incident really happened. Also last month, a Central Florida school district found no evidence of another Liberty Institute complaint alleging that a school official told a 5-year-old girl to stop praying during lunch.

“Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2014/05/05/4099850/group-charging-schools-with-religious.html#storylink=cpy

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
13. It wasn't free reading time
Tue May 6, 2014, 05:58 PM
May 2014

It was accelerated reading time. The schools here do that and there are specific books that are a part of it. He had to read an AR (accelerated reader) book. My daughter often had to put one book aside to pick up an AR book for school. This isn't uncommon, and it being a Bible doesn't make it a different issue.

 

immoderate

(20,885 posts)
14. I think the teacher is taking the wrong approach.
Tue May 6, 2014, 06:00 PM
May 2014

"I think the bible should be among the books you choose for elective reading. What else are you reading?"

True story: I caught a student reading his bible in a class I was teaching. I had him turn to Ecclesiastes 3. I invited him to read aloud. The chapter starts with:

To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven:
A time to be born, and a time to die; a time to plant, and a time to pluck up that which is planted


At which I said, "Get it?" (And I later signed him up for extra help.)

--imm

charmay

(525 posts)
18. Fundamentalist fake outrage.
Tue May 6, 2014, 06:59 PM
May 2014

Using children to fuel their agenda. Now they can send out emails trashing public schools and teachers.

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
20. My kid got in trouble for reading books
Tue May 6, 2014, 07:24 PM
May 2014

She was having discipline issues, so I told her that when she had nothing to do, she should read. I gave her a copy of Cujo, because that's what she wanted to read.

The teacher was upset at the subject, but mostly upset at the fact that she was reading during math time. Turns out, he'd allocated 105 minutes for math (test prep) and she'd finished in less than five minutes.

Out of the thousands of teachers I've known -- many of them quite well -- that dbag is among the bottom five. People who don't function well with alteration or deviation, who are too rigid, usually don't make good teachers.

knitter4democracy

(14,350 posts)
27. The Bible's not on the AR list, and this was during AR reading time.
Tue May 6, 2014, 10:04 PM
May 2014

AR, Accelerated Reader, is a system in which students read books off a list and then take computer tests on the books to prove that they read them carefully. The Bible's not on it for good reason (which translation, which books in it, what grade level, and what kind of questions could we ask?).

Also, there is no Book of Prophets. He obviously hasn't been reading it if he thinks that's a book. Is he thinking of Proverbs?

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
49. It's more complicated than that
Wed May 7, 2014, 09:02 AM
May 2014

You have to read the translation that has that rating, but also each child has to read books of a specific rating - one that challenges them a bit but not too much. Then after they master that rating they move up.

knitter4democracy

(14,350 posts)
67. True, but it probably wasn't what was best for the student.
Wed May 7, 2014, 08:56 PM
May 2014

Those books are not easy to read. If you don't pass the AR test, you're supposed to re-read the book and then take the test again. If the kid really thinks there's a Book of Prophets (I really hope that's a misquote), I'm going with the teacher on moving him in a different direction.

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
29. If the kid can pass the test without reading in class
Tue May 6, 2014, 10:11 PM
May 2014

Then let them read whatever they want. Maybe this kid already read most of those other books, and has time to read the bible. Just so long as they don't real aloud, or start preaching at school, and they can pass their reading tests, who cares. It's a shame this kid is wasting time reading that book of fantasy.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
50. That's not how the AR program works
Wed May 7, 2014, 09:06 AM
May 2014

You have to read books of a particular rating - one that challenges you a bit but not too much - and when you master that level, you move on to a higher rating. So if he passes the test for that level, he'd have other books to choose from for another level. It still wouldn't be actual free reading time.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
31. Maybe parents need help with reading comprehension
Tue May 6, 2014, 10:22 PM
May 2014

So they can better understand school books and reading policy.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
34. For some reason I'm reminded of the young man
Wed May 7, 2014, 12:56 AM
May 2014

who sat next to me in Algebra II at a junior college some years ago. I forget how it was I knew he was very much a Christian, but it was nice, clean-cut, and didn't make it to class as often as he should have. On the day of the final, I couldn't help but notice that he took a few minutes to pray quietly. Had I not been sitting right next to him I'd never have noticed.

I saw him after the semester ended and learned he'd failed the class. I'm thinking going to class and doing his homework might have been a much more effective learning strategy than prayer.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
36. "Accelerated reader?"
Wed May 7, 2014, 07:01 AM
May 2014

Did I read that right? He's a 12-year-old 5th grader?

My daughter is 11 and in 6th grade.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
42. The AR program supposedly helps all kids increase their reading level
Wed May 7, 2014, 07:19 AM
May 2014

and I've heard is especially helpful for kids with learning disabilities. So kids who start behind might benefit the most from the program.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
43. Yes, I understand the program....
Wed May 7, 2014, 07:34 AM
May 2014

I was stunned by the 12-year-old 5th grader, though maybe he just had a birthday JUST on the other side of the cut-off date.

Mariana

(14,859 posts)
60. Occasionally kids repeat a grade.
Wed May 7, 2014, 11:16 AM
May 2014

Sometimes it's because they refuse to do the work they're supposed to do. For example, maybe they spend their accelerated reading time reading the Bible instead of the assigned reading material.

Dorian Gray

(13,498 posts)
40. Unless he's supposed
Wed May 7, 2014, 07:16 AM
May 2014

to be reading a particular book assigned by the class, why can't he read that book during free reading period?

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
44. Read the article....
Wed May 7, 2014, 07:36 AM
May 2014

Last edited Wed May 7, 2014, 09:42 AM - Edit history (1)

It WASN'T a free reading period, it was an acellerated reader period, which a specific list of books. Students ARE permitted to read the Bible in a no-kidding free reading period.

Dorian Gray

(13,498 posts)
54. I realized that as I read further down the thread.
Wed May 7, 2014, 09:37 AM
May 2014

I responded above (even though it was after this post) knowing that.

False issue.

Capt. Obvious

(9,002 posts)
48. Free reading time isn't so free after all
Wed May 7, 2014, 09:01 AM
May 2014

I just wanted to be the next person to say that without reading the article or thread.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
63. "The bible is a book with some beautiful poetry, a bloodstained history, a wealth of obscenity, and
Wed May 7, 2014, 02:40 PM
May 2014

upwards of 10,0000 lies." Mark Twain

I wonder which part the kid was reading.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»South Florida student say...