Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFCC votes to start formal consideration of net neutrality proposal
FCC votes to start formal consideration of net neutrality proposal
By Jim Puzzanghera
Wheeler made some changes to his proposal this week to secure the votes of Clyburn and Jessica Rosenworcel, the commissions other two Democrats...both publicly thanked him for the changes, which included asking whether pay-for-priority deals should be banned outright and if the FCC should subject broadband providers to stricter utility-like regulations.
Still, Rosenworcel criticized the process as too rushed.
She had called last week for a one-month delay in Wednesdays vote in response to the sharp public outcry in recent weeks to Wheelers proposal, which critics have said would allow broadband providers to create paid fast lanes on the Internet.
<...>
In response to the backlash, Wheeler revised his proposal this week, specifically asking for public feedback on whether pay-for-priority deals should be banned and if the FCC should reclassify broadband providers for sticter regulation under Title 2 of the nations telecommunications law.
- more -
http://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-fi-mo-net-neutrality-fcc-protestors-wheeler-20140515-story.html
By Jim Puzzanghera
Wheeler made some changes to his proposal this week to secure the votes of Clyburn and Jessica Rosenworcel, the commissions other two Democrats...both publicly thanked him for the changes, which included asking whether pay-for-priority deals should be banned outright and if the FCC should subject broadband providers to stricter utility-like regulations.
Still, Rosenworcel criticized the process as too rushed.
She had called last week for a one-month delay in Wednesdays vote in response to the sharp public outcry in recent weeks to Wheelers proposal, which critics have said would allow broadband providers to create paid fast lanes on the Internet.
<...>
In response to the backlash, Wheeler revised his proposal this week, specifically asking for public feedback on whether pay-for-priority deals should be banned and if the FCC should reclassify broadband providers for sticter regulation under Title 2 of the nations telecommunications law.
- more -
http://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-fi-mo-net-neutrality-fcc-protestors-wheeler-20140515-story.html
Call to action:
The FCC has asked for public comment on new rules about net neutrality.
Use this form to submit a comment to the FCC. Learn more about the FCC rulemaking process.
Dear FCC,
<...>
It's our Internet. We made it, and it has re-made us, changing the way we communicate, learn, share and create.
We want the Internet to continue to live up to its promise, fostering innovation, creativity and freedom. We don't want regulations that will turn our ISPs into gatekeepers, making special deals with the few companies that can "pay to play" and inhibiting new competition, innovation and expression.
Start your letter to the FCC:
- more -
https://www.dearfcc.org/
Use this form to submit a comment to the FCC. Learn more about the FCC rulemaking process.
Dear FCC,
<...>
It's our Internet. We made it, and it has re-made us, changing the way we communicate, learn, share and create.
We want the Internet to continue to live up to its promise, fostering innovation, creativity and freedom. We don't want regulations that will turn our ISPs into gatekeepers, making special deals with the few companies that can "pay to play" and inhibiting new competition, innovation and expression.
Start your letter to the FCC:
- more -
https://www.dearfcc.org/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 627 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FCC votes to start formal consideration of net neutrality proposal (Original Post)
ProSense
May 2014
OP
ProSense
(116,464 posts)1. Kick! n/t
ProSense
(116,464 posts)2. ACLU: Proposed FCC Rules Don’t Do Enough to Protect Net Neutrality
Proposed FCC Rules Dont Do Enough to Protect Net Neutrality
WASHINGTON The Federal Communications Commission voted today to open a new rule for how Internet Service Providers treat the data they carry for public comment. The proposal follows a January decision by the D.C. Circuit Appeals Court that stuck down key provisions of the FCCs existing net neutrality rules.
Gabe Rottman, legislative counsel and policy advisor with the American Civil Liberties Union, had this reaction to todays vote and proposed rule:
This proposed rule leaves the individual at the mercy of an increasingly concentrated broadband market, in which the big players will be able to act as gatekeepers for online speech, deciding what gets seen and when. Fortunately, the FCC left the door open to fix this problem by reclassifying broadband internet service as what it really is: a public utility, or in legal terms, a common carrier, which we will continue to vigorously advocate for. This is a First Amendment issue because if broadband service providers are allowed to slow or block some content at will, they will be able to stifle the speech of internet users. The FCC must ensure that it has the tools necessary to prevent such blocking or discrimination against certain types of content.
https://www.aclu.org/free-speech/proposed-fcc-rules-dont-do-enough-protect-net-neutrality
WASHINGTON The Federal Communications Commission voted today to open a new rule for how Internet Service Providers treat the data they carry for public comment. The proposal follows a January decision by the D.C. Circuit Appeals Court that stuck down key provisions of the FCCs existing net neutrality rules.
Gabe Rottman, legislative counsel and policy advisor with the American Civil Liberties Union, had this reaction to todays vote and proposed rule:
This proposed rule leaves the individual at the mercy of an increasingly concentrated broadband market, in which the big players will be able to act as gatekeepers for online speech, deciding what gets seen and when. Fortunately, the FCC left the door open to fix this problem by reclassifying broadband internet service as what it really is: a public utility, or in legal terms, a common carrier, which we will continue to vigorously advocate for. This is a First Amendment issue because if broadband service providers are allowed to slow or block some content at will, they will be able to stifle the speech of internet users. The FCC must ensure that it has the tools necessary to prevent such blocking or discrimination against certain types of content.
https://www.aclu.org/free-speech/proposed-fcc-rules-dont-do-enough-protect-net-neutrality
sheshe2
(83,754 posts)3. Kicked and Signing! nt
ProSense
(116,464 posts)4. Thanks. n/t