And in this edition of "Discussionist or Stormfront?"

[NuclearDem]

When will we end minority privilige?
Welfare, in it's various forms, has transferred literally trillions of dollars from the work of white males to white women, women of color and "minorities" since the early 1960s.

Affirmative action has given white women, women of color and other "minorities" special "treatment" in hiring and yet they still lag behind.

It's time they stood on their own two feet.

Why can't you takers get by in life without my money?

Which is it, everyone's favorite white supremacist hate site, or Discussionist?

[LeftyMom]

1. You promise it's not DU? It sounds like a few DUers I can think of. nt

[LisaLynne]

6. ...

[geek tragedy]

2. the "privilege" comment leads me to guess discussionist.

not going to look at either site to verify.

[shenmue]

3. I'm guessing Discussionist

I've looked at that site a couple times. Haven't joined yet.

[Whisp]

4. no surprise it's becoming a toxic waste site/dump.

I visited there a couple times and the place reeks.

[geek tragedy]

10. this is what governance by jury looks like without moderators/admins

there to crack down on bigots

communities are not capable of maintaining their own standards

[Whisp]

24. 'communities are not capable of maintaining their own standards'

I think that's been proven throughout history a few times. Communities and Committees.

[Capt. Obvious]

31. Yet you alerted on it

and it was hidden

[DeadLetterOffice]

36. "communities are not capable of maintaining their own standards "

Nah, communities maintain their standards exactly as they want them.
They just have a tendency to lie about what those desired standards actually *are.*

[geek tragedy]

38. There's an inevitable spiral downwards. nt

[hlthe2b]

41. ++++++ Even the abysmal HuffPO has concluded they must have moderators.

[greatauntoftriplets]

5. Good Lord.

[MohRokTah]

7. Discussionist is for the hardest of hardcore DU Obama Haters

and the people whom Stormfront and Freerepublic kicked out because they took this just a bit too far to the right.

[randys1]

8. It is discussionist and if you call him a filthy and disgusting bigot asshole

you will get banned, as I did

When you call a filthy, disgusting asshole bigot a filthy, disgusting asshole bigot, that is not name calling, it is correct identification.

[CreekDog]

12. on Discussionist?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/11876548#post88

[randys1]

14. Not a clue what you are doing here or saying

[geek tragedy]

15. of course, explicit racism is against the TOS per the advertisers, so that

post will probably get administratively zapped

[Capt. Obvious]

17. This is the second time I've seen you claim this

Not that I'm outright doubting you but what was your name over there?

There have been a few grave dancing threads (that I've read) over bannings there and they've all been for members posting from multiple accounts.

[randys1]

26. It is a 90 day suspension, something about transparency page and 5 reported

posts

I am not telling you may name there, it is a different forum...
and i didnt have multiple accounts

just one

[Capt. Obvious]

27. So you weren't banned then

I assumed that was the case when I read your claim prior.

[randys1]

28. 90 days is the same thing as far as i am concerned

ridiculous

God damn right wing lying pieces of shit making shit up all day long over there

it was fun while it lasted

[Hoyt]

9. At least poster is getting his due there, until the hateful right wingers show up.

[MohRokTah]

11. I've noticed a certain pro-GMO poster who cannot understand people not wanting to consume GMO food

and who happens to be on a timeout there is making lots of new friends.

[Shandris]

13. Guessing Discussionist.

I would think SF would be more of a 'circlejerk', and that sounds more like a confrontational question. I don't know for sure, of course...while I'm willing to get 'in the dirt' to study the opposition in their native habitat, there's a difference between 'in the dirt' and 'swimming in the detritus of the local gene pool'.

[LittleBlue]

16. The most hilarious part

They think welfare payments are a transfer of wealth.

Like welfare recipients are investing that money and becoming tycoons or something.

Logged on to my Discussionist account, I'm going in

[blkmusclmachine]

18. Won't be visiting Discussionist. Ever.

[Capt. Obvious]

19. The suspense is killing me

Message hidden by jury decision

[Arkansas Granny]

20. And that post has already been hidden.

[Nye Bevan]

21. So when people see objectionable posts on Discussionist, you're supposed to bring them here,

to GD in DU, to complain about them?

I'm still learning how this new system works.

[Capt. Obvious]

22. Where else would they bring it?

Discussionist?

[WinkyDink]

33. Nowhere else would be a reasonable option. We don't need links, either. WE KNOW WHERE IT IS.

[Capt. Obvious]

34. Are you sure

about that?

[boston bean]

40. It's a time honored DU tradition to bring right wing bat shit bigoted bullshit

here for discussion and smackdown.

Why should discussionist be any different?

[geek tragedy]

23. nailbiter of a jury verdict, 4-3

On Wed May 28, 2014, 05:33 PM you sent an alert on the following post:

When will we end minority privilige?
http://www.discussionist.com/101537751

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is uncivil, off-topic, offensive, or otherwise inappropriate.

COMMENTS

This person is a bigoted, KKK-card- carrying piece of shit.

JURY RESULTS

A randomly-selected Jury of Discussionist members completed their review of this alert at Wed May 28, 2014, 05:41 PM, and voted 4-3 to HIDE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Meh. I think we should leave this so people can debate it.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I find the premise objectionable and narrow-minded but this seems like the type of thinking that needs to be debated. Not that any amount of factual information will actually be acknowledged by the poster.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: welfare transfers money to people of all races, not just minorities. many minorities are victims of the welfare state, not the cause of it.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I don't agree with poster's assumption, but it's worth discussion.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: 50 years ago my mom took "commodities" to help feed her 5 children while my dad lost money driving long haul. Was she a "taker"? Go back under your rock you elitist prig.

Thank you.

[MohRokTah]

29. So, like DU, posts are hidden or left based upon how the gods of the RNG treat you.

That's aggravating enough here, let alone in a cesspool like Discussionist.

[polly7]

25. Can you post any of the responses?

I've read there, and there seem to be many very intelligent people countering that type of bullshit pretty quickly and making them look like fools.

[WinkyDink]

32. Noooooooooooooo. GO there, FGS.

[WinkyDink]

30. MUST we? If we wanted to read EITHER, WE WOULD.

[Hissyspit]

35. I have no interest in that site at all.

[merrily]

37. If you don't like Discussionist, why even go there?

[tabasco]

39. DU has become a money making operation

Principles, standards and reasonable moderation might get in the way of that.

[Sissyk]

42. Why does it matter?

They are both linked to here. Just this week in fact Stormfront was linked to in a OP by someone trying to prove MRA's exist, or something.