General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSCOTUSBlog live blogging the rulings now
http://live.scotusblog.com/Event/Live_blog_of_opinions__June_30_2014Watching this one closely...
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Welcome to the Theocratic States of Corporatocracy.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)This shit is going to hurt. A Dem President will appoint judges that are not rw ideologues.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)JFK appointed Byron White, for instance.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Lancero
(3,003 posts)"The Court says that the government has failed to show that the mandate is the least restrictive means of advancing its interest in guaranteeing cost-free access to birth control. - See more at: http://live.scotusblog.com/Event/Live_blog_of_opinions__June_30_2014#sthash.KFC4gP3l.dpuf"
Not sure what part this is for, but I'm starting to get some 'oh shit' vibes.
Glitterati
(3,182 posts)And the Koch Brothers companies!!!!!!
Boyo, boyo, boyo what a pandora box these asses just opened.
unblock
(52,230 posts)Glitterati
(3,182 posts)Any company that has only a limited number of shareholders. Closely held corporation stock is publicly traded on occasion, but not on a regular basis. These entities differ from privately owned firms that issue stock that is not publicly traded. Those who own shares of closely held corporations should consult a financial planner with expertise in the tax and estate ramifications that come with owning this type of stock.
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/closely-held-corporation.asp