General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums3 Lies About Birth Control That Were Just Reinforced By The Hobby Lobby Ruling
1. Birth control is the same thing as abortionThe entire legal challenge against the Obama administration was based on the fundamental lie that certain types of FDA-approved contraception can end a pregnancy. The plaintiffs in this suit took the unscientific stance that pregnancy begins at fertilization and certain types of contraception, like the morning after pill and IUDs, are abortion-inducing because they prevent the implantation of a fertilized egg. But according to the legal definition of pregnancy, a woman is not actually considered to be pregnant until a fertilized egg is implanted in her uterine lining so anything that inhibits ovulation, fertilization, or implantation is defined as birth control. And on top of that, theres evidence that those types of contraception dont actually prevent implantation in the first place.
(snip)
2. Birth control should be separated from other types of medical services
Hobby Lobby opponents have been concerned about the cases implication for services beyond contraception, pointing out that other companies might cite their religious beliefs to refuse coverage for vaccinations, blood transfusions, or services for transgender individuals. The Court briefly attempted to quell those concerns, specifying that Mondays decision concerns only the contraceptive mandate and shouldnt be interpreted to apply to other services like vaccines.
(snip)
3. Its easier for the government to pay for peoples birth control so that companies dont have to
In his opinion, Alito suggests that the government could simply assume the cost of providing the four contraceptives to women unable to obtain coverage due to their employers religious objections. That may sound like a reasonable compromise. But in the context of our current insurance system, it doesnt necessarily make much sense.
(snip)
And, as Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg writes in her dissent to Mondays opinion, the governments safety net system for affordable contraception cant necessarily accommodate more women. The Title X program is currently the publicly-funded family planning program thats supposed to help low-income women afford their reproductive health care. But its been plagued with rounds of budget cuts in states across the country often led by Republican lawmakers who oppose the idea of taxpayer funded birth control and its struggling to provide care for all the women who need help. As a result, unintended pregnancies have become increasingly concentrated among poor women who lack access to birth control.
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2014/06/30/3454815/birth-control-lies-hobby-lobby-ruling/
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)RockaFowler
(7,429 posts)Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)Let's take that to it's logical conclusion
Its easier for the government to pay for peoples health care so that companies dont have to.
Sounds like the opening salvo of single payer.
woodsprite
(11,915 posts)Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome or to regulate cycles as part of infertility treatment in order to conceive.
Mariana
(14,857 posts)that BC pills work by causing abortions, then probably not. In fact, it'll be pretty telling if they do cover it for those conditions, but not for preventing pregnancy - that would indicate that they don't really believe these drugs/devices are abortifacients.
lancer78
(1,495 posts)of this scene from Monty Python.
Vogon_Glory
(9,117 posts)That sounds like how the anti-abortion fanatics think. I was outside the US Supreme Court with a different demonstration watching and listening to the anti-abortion activists' antics before and after the decision was handed down, and I'd say that's a pretty accurate description of their mindsets.
Today they continue their sneak attack on birth control, Tomorrow they criminalize abortion, the day after, they outlaw contraceptives.
sinkingfeeling
(51,457 posts)I was prescribed oral contraceptives for endometriosis when I was younger.