Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
16 replies, 3291 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (100)
ReplyReply to this post
16 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Totally Stoked about the Hobby Lobby Ruling! (Original Post)
riqster
Jul 2014
OP
Sorry but book of Deuteronomy is Old Testament and the justices who ruled for HL believe in the New
lostincalifornia
Jul 2014
#2
They don't even seem to know that the New Testament exists. They certainly never
DesertDiamond
Jul 2014
#10
Louisiana1976
(3,962 posts)1. ....
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)2. Sorry but book of Deuteronomy is Old Testament and the justices who ruled for HL believe in the New
Testament case dismissed
riqster
(13,986 posts)3. Would to god that they did.
Check out Fundy theology sometime. Heavy on the OT.
DesertDiamond
(1,616 posts)10. They don't even seem to know that the New Testament exists. They certainly never
make rulings based on it. Nor live by it.
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)12. I know just being funny
Cha
(297,203 posts)4. Fugelsang Tweet..
John Fugelsang ✔ @JohnFugelsang
Follow
Supreme Court rules in #HobbyLobby case that religious preferences don't have to follow laws. Your move, Rastafarians.
6:54 AM - 30 Jun 2014
2,201 Retweets 1,514 favorites
klook
(12,154 posts)14. Looking forward to Pastafarian legal cases
Serving noodles is a grotesque mockery of my religion!
EEO
(1,620 posts)7. I want to try this with my mortgage.
riqster
(13,986 posts)8. Damn. I like it, I like it.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)9. Despite the Supreme Court trying to say that this was a very narrow ruling,
they really have opened the doors to all manner of similar religious belief claims.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)13. Nah. Read the * at the bottom of Scalia's diatribe:
*Applies ONLY to far rightwing religious beliefs. Democrats and Independents need never apply.
liberalmuse
(18,672 posts)11. Oh hell yeah!
drm604
(16,230 posts)15. So if I have a 30 year mortgage...
riqster
(13,986 posts)16. Yep. 23 years they have to forgive! Praise Moses!