Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNine out of 10 people in Edward Snowden's NSA intercepts were not targets
http://www.smh.com.au/world/nine-out-of-10-people-in-edward-snowdens-nsa-intercepts-were-not-targets-20140706-zsxv0.html#ixzz36fON3FZrWashington: Ordinary internet users far outnumber legally targeted foreigners in the communications intercepted by the National Security Agency from US digital networks.
Nine out of 10 account holders found in a large cache of intercepted conversations, which former NSA contractor Edward Snowden provided to The Washington Post, were not the intended surveillance targets but were caught in a net the agency had cast for somebody else.
Many of them were Americans. Nearly half of the surveillance files, a strikingly high proportion, contained names, email addresses or other details that the NSA marked as belonging to US citizens or residents. NSA analysts masked, or "minimised", more than 65,000 such references to protect Americans' privacy, but nearly 900 additional email addresses were found unmasked in the files, which could be strongly linked to US citizens or residents.
There are discoveries of considerable intelligence value in the intercepted messages but also collateral harm to privacy on a scale that the Obama administration has not been willing to address.
Nine out of 10 account holders found in a large cache of intercepted conversations, which former NSA contractor Edward Snowden provided to The Washington Post, were not the intended surveillance targets but were caught in a net the agency had cast for somebody else.
Many of them were Americans. Nearly half of the surveillance files, a strikingly high proportion, contained names, email addresses or other details that the NSA marked as belonging to US citizens or residents. NSA analysts masked, or "minimised", more than 65,000 such references to protect Americans' privacy, but nearly 900 additional email addresses were found unmasked in the files, which could be strongly linked to US citizens or residents.
There are discoveries of considerable intelligence value in the intercepted messages but also collateral harm to privacy on a scale that the Obama administration has not been willing to address.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
12 replies, 958 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nine out of 10 people in Edward Snowden's NSA intercepts were not targets (Original Post)
Luminous Animal
Jul 2014
OP
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)1. Ordinary internet users far outnumber legally targeted foreigners
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)2. Kick.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)3. Kick again.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)4. Another take on it
http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2014/07/nsa-said-edward-snowden-had-no-access-surveillance-intercepts-they-lied
The NSA Said Edward Snowden Had No Access to Surveillance Intercepts. They Lied.
The NSA Said Edward Snowden Had No Access to Surveillance Intercepts. They Lied.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)8. That's a great article. Thanks n2doc
Oh, and another kick!
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)5. This thread is mighty quiet eh? Kick! nt
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)6. Keerickets.
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)7. Hobby Lobby
Snowden had boxes in his garage.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)9. Are we safe yet? K&R
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)10. The original WaPo article
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/in-nsa-intercepted-data-those-not-targeted-far-outnumber-the-foreigners-who-are/2014/07/05/8139adf8-045a-11e4-8572-4b1b969b6322_story.html
If Snowdens sample is representative, the population under scrutiny in the PRISM and Upstream programs is far larger than the government has suggested. In a June 26 transparency report, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence disclosed that 89,138 people were targets of last years collection under FISA Section 702. At the 9-to-1 ratio of incidental collection in Snowdens sample, the offices figure would correspond to nearly 900,000 accounts, targeted or not, under surveillance.
(snip)
In the interview, Snowden said he did not need to circumvent those controls, because his final position as a contractor for Booz Allen at the NSAs Hawaii operations center gave him unusually broad, unescorted access to raw SIGINT under a special Dual Authorities role, a reference to Section 702 for domestic collection and Executive Order 12333 for collection overseas. Those credentials, he said, allowed him to search stored content and task new collection without prior approval of his search terms.
If I had wanted to pull a copy of a judges or a senators e-mail, all I had to do was enter that selector into XKEYSCORE, one of the NSAs main query systems, he said.
(snip)
In an ordinary FISA surveillance application, the judge grants a warrant and requires a fresh review of probable cause and the content of collected surveillance every 90 days. When renewal fails, NSA and allied analysts sometimes switch to the more lenient standards of PRISM and Upstream.
(snip)
In the interview, Snowden said he did not need to circumvent those controls, because his final position as a contractor for Booz Allen at the NSAs Hawaii operations center gave him unusually broad, unescorted access to raw SIGINT under a special Dual Authorities role, a reference to Section 702 for domestic collection and Executive Order 12333 for collection overseas. Those credentials, he said, allowed him to search stored content and task new collection without prior approval of his search terms.
If I had wanted to pull a copy of a judges or a senators e-mail, all I had to do was enter that selector into XKEYSCORE, one of the NSAs main query systems, he said.
(snip)
In an ordinary FISA surveillance application, the judge grants a warrant and requires a fresh review of probable cause and the content of collected surveillance every 90 days. When renewal fails, NSA and allied analysts sometimes switch to the more lenient standards of PRISM and Upstream.
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)11. Another important bit from the article...
...is this one:
As recently as May, shortly after he retired as NSA director, Gen. Keith Alexander denied that Snowden could have passed FISA content to journalists.
(...)
They didnt touch the FISA data, Alexander replied. He added, That database, he didnt have access to.
(...)
The NSA has released an e-mail exchange acknowledging that Snowden took the required training classes for access to those systems.
The article is worth reading in its entirety. Here we have another case where Alexander clearly lied, and where Snowden appears to be telling the truth -- he took the required training, so it's plausible that he was authorized to access those records, as he has claimed. Anyway, the Washington Post obtained the information for this article from Snowden, demonstrating that he did, in fact, have access to it.
bobduca
(1,763 posts)12. Kick