Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democrats_win

(6,539 posts)
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 02:26 PM Jul 2014

Incorporation shouldn't force people to give up their rights?

In moving beyond the corporate personhood argument, the right makes this argument:

"The government simply can’t force people to forfeit their free exercise rights when they incorporate a business—just as it can’t force them to forsake these liberties when they enter the workforce, attend school, or engage in any other secular pursuit. More to the point, there’s nothing about the act of incorporation (or commerce generally) that necessarily amounts to a waiver of individual free exercise rights."
http://www.forbes.com/sites/ilyashapiro/2014/02/03/so-what-if-corporations-arent-people/

This doesn't seem quite right, does it? What do you think?

A corporation is evidently a special island where real people can escape liabilities while retaining the right to lord their rights over every entity in and out of the corporation. Are there limits to the corporation imposing their rights on its employees? This argument seems to give "carte blanche" to a workplace environment that sometimes feels like slavery already. This might be acceptable if incorporation added some other reasonable responsibilities on a corporation. But it doesn't.

Remember when conservatives talked about personal responsibilities? 'With rights come responsibilities!' The only responsibility a corporation has is to make a profit. Sadly, some "wise" old man on the Supreme Court don't seem to understand how dangerous a myopic corporation can be to our society.

Recall the Hobby Lobby case: the problem they had with a particular birth control method was factually incorrect! It's simply amazing. If we must tolerate the slavery of a corporate workplace, can we at least expect them to be honest and factual? If we are an enlightened nation, how can we survive the stupidity and tyranny from the top 1%?

Just think, incorporation is partly about bad people escaping punishment by hiding behind the corporation. In a way, the victims of corporations are losing their rights to seek justice because a criminal incorporated. Oh, and don't forget tort-reform. They want to erase almost all rights of victims to go against the corporation.

Reagan and his Republicans liked to criticize the government without noticing the power of corporations. To PARAPHRASE Reagan's famous rant against 'socialized medicine:' "One day... we will wake to find that we have" corporate fascism (my words). Under this scenario, Reagan says, "We are going to spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children, what it once was like in America when men were free." Thank-you uncle, Ronny that's exactly what YOU gave us. Corporations stole our freedom.






3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Incorporation shouldn't force people to give up their rights? (Original Post) Democrats_win Jul 2014 OP
Quite right, PEOPLE shouldn't and don't have to forfeit our rights. elleng Jul 2014 #1
If incorporating protects ownership from liability... HooptieWagon Jul 2014 #2
This is a key issue with incorporation that can only be solved with regulation el_bryanto Jul 2014 #3

elleng

(130,895 posts)
1. Quite right, PEOPLE shouldn't and don't have to forfeit our rights.
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 02:34 PM
Jul 2014

Corporations, however, are NOT people.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
2. If incorporating protects ownership from liability...
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 02:58 PM
Jul 2014

then theres no reason not to have to give up some rights in return.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
3. This is a key issue with incorporation that can only be solved with regulation
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 03:15 PM
Jul 2014

A Corporation is a way to diffuse morality. In other words, if you, as an individual, faced a situation where you had to take someones home away from them, you might well hesitate or decide not to do it - but if you work for a corporation you are required to follow the directives of the corporation - or quit. As an individual - you aren't responsible. Your morality doesn't come into it; your actions are dictated by the procedures of the company.

This isn't unique to corporations - nations have a similar loophole; you wouldn't just shoot someone, but if you are a soldier and told to attack something and kill the people defending it, that's what you do.

This is why you need strong and active regulation of corporations - they are basically animals, living in a state of vicious nature - willing to tear apart anyone and anything in the pursuit of their goals. Conservatives have argued for generations that the logic of capitalism and mutual competition will force companies to act more morally - but that hasn't been the case. The only way to impose morality on the corporation is through regulation.

Or that's my thinking.

Bryant

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Incorporation shouldn't f...