General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI hate to say this, Fellas and I hope I'm wrong BUT I just don't see fleetfoot zimmy turning
himself in peacefully and quickly. IF he's still in the country, if he has his druthers, He won't be much longer. I think he's too much of a narcissist to save the country some money and walk to the Pearly Gates. I just don't think he's going to do the right thing, period. He hasn't up to this point and there's no indication that anything's going to change.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)there is no basis for the law to go after him as he wasn't charged with anything until today, but there are plenty of private investigators that Could do that.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)FYI
Ecumenist
(6,086 posts)Thanks...
snooper2
(30,151 posts)The comma should be after "Fellas", and I believe it's optional to have one after the word "wrong", but somebody can correct me on that
Ecumenist
(6,086 posts)I'm sorry but I wasn't aware that I was in grammar class..
snooper2
(30,151 posts)My problem is I try to put punctuation where it sounds right instead of what "is" right sometimes LOL
but, we are always learning
Ecumenist
(6,086 posts)magical thyme
(14,881 posts)unless there is a "but" exception that I can't think of.
Doncha just love the online grammar police?!?
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Is this not correct?
Two specific situations call for the use of a comma before "and." The first is created when we have three or more items in a series. This mark of punctuation is called the serial comma. For a full explanation of why we use the serial comma, please read our previous tip on the subject. (See "Serial Comma" on p. 49 in our book of writing tips or find the link to the "Serial Comma" tip in our online tip archive.)
The second situation occurs when "and" is being used to coordinate two independent clauses. An independent clausealso known as a main clauseis a group of words that has a subject and a verb and can stand alone as a sentence. In the following example, the independent clauses are in brackets:
[Miguel took piano lessons for sixteen years], and [today he is an accomplished performer].
More---
http://www.getitwriteonline.com/archive/020204WhenCommaBfAnd.htm
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)I shoulda known bettah!
I was thinking of all the times I've seen commas inserted incorrectly into places where they serve no purpose whatsoever except to wreck a sentence.
Yes, independent clauses require commas, as do long lists.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)bacon and eggs.
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)I am very knowledgeable in grammar and punctuation because I was a copy editor for 35 outdoors magazines until 2010.
nebenaube
(3,496 posts)Despite the fact that both ways have been taught in this country.
Ecumenist
(6,086 posts)of grammar and punctuation. THE END. Good grief.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)It is not optional. Within the context, there should be 2 commas surrounding what is called a "parenthetical statement." That is a phrase that can be removed, in its entirety, from the sentence without changing the meaning or grammatical correctness of the sentence.
In this case, the parenthetical statement is "and I hope I'm wrong," as in:
I hate to say this Fellas, but I just don't see fleetfoot zimmy turning"
That said, this is an awkward sentence for punctuation, since you could also separate out "Fellas" as follows:
'I hate to say this, Fellas, and I hope I'm wrong, BUT I just don't see fleetfoot zimmy turning."
The sentence could have Fellas removed and still be correct:
"I hate to say this, and I hope I'm wrong, but I just don't see fleetfoot zimmy turning."
Or both statements removed, as follows:
"I hate to say this, but I just don't see fleetfoot zimmy turning."
Aren't you glad you turned all grammar cop and all?
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)The sentence could have Fellas removed and still be correct:
snooper2
(30,151 posts)I guess this is officially now a thread hijack?
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)"Fellas and I hope I'm wrong".
11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)be a comma subsequent to "Fellas".
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)he's been under surveillance the whole time he's been in hiding.
He was living at his father's place initially after the murder. Nothing that says he hasn't been watched the whole time.
We'll find out tonight. Maybe the "within 72 hours" was to give them time to arrest him and get him in custody before the announcement. Now that the announcement is set for 6pm, maybe they've already got him safely behind bars somewhere...
Ecumenist
(6,086 posts)way to Peru to eat Cuy, Lomo Saltido and Cevishe
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Ecumenist
(6,086 posts)watermelon head.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Amerigo Vespucci
(30,885 posts)My guess is that he's shitting himself right now and crying his eyes out on the phone to daddy. Or he's sedated. One or the other, no third choice. He's a coward. And he basically screwed the pooch already with his little disappearing act. As long as he was allowing his attorneys to spin their daily bullshit, he was a guy waiting for the Special Prosecutor to make up her mind. Today, he's a flight risk. I'm sure that when Ms. Corey announced the 72 hour "countdown clock" on her decision, he burrowed in DEEP, whether it's in Peru or in the last state in the country you'd expect to find him. I'm sure Pappy Zim has connections all over the place. It only took a phone call and a plane ticket.
FSogol
(45,513 posts)He has no where to go.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)You must know him personally to know so much about him!
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)get no bail. But since he doesn't have lawyers and hasn't shown himself to be the brightest when it comes to making decisions, it's possible. But sooner or later he would be found, if charged, and would be in jail with no bail not to mention how fleeing would affect his trial.