General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRegarding prominent leftists
Does anyone have a list of leftists that the doctrinaire dems haven't thrown under the bus for slights against Obama (real or perceived)? It is getting hard to keep track of.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Another apt desctiption for them would be "unrealistic whiners".
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Thanks, MohRokTah.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Then what they say will actually mean something.
Until then, they remain unrealistic whiners.
BlindTiresias
(1,563 posts)Don't you think its a little much to basically be writing off every single one like that? Lots of prominent and influential leftists have historically never held office but still done great things. I dunno, I hope you are just saying this out of anger or something.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)BlindTiresias
(1,563 posts)Well at least you are honest.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)of the left in general quite clear.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)I dislike the unrealistic left in general.
This constitutes a large portion of the so-called left because they have no realistic viewpoint on how to implement left policies.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)has been right about just everything over the past 15 years or so. I haven't seen you support much of anything that would be considered 'left' other than the obligatory women/gay/minority issues which is required in order to be accepted as 'left'. The Third Way which is actually Far Right, which wants to stand out by giving itself that title, also 'supports' those issues, but on everything else they are far right.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)To name just a few.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)do not respect Leftists. The question is, who do you respect? It's either Leftists, Righties or worse than both, the Third Way?
JEB
(4,748 posts)MLK never held office, so according to some here he was just a whiner. Disgusting. If that is the really the Democratic Party's position, then it's over. Probably just a handful of ignorant bully types spouting off.
I don't know what to make of it, personally.
JEB
(4,748 posts)whenever someone on the expresses anything less than blissful worship.
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)but no one even rubbernecked:
Nat Hentoff
...
On December 31, 2008, the Village Voice, which had regularly published Hentoff's commentary and criticism for fifty years, announced that he had been laid off.[4] In February 2009, Hentoff joined the libertarian Cato Institute as a senior fellow. In January 2010, however, Hentoff returned and wrote one article for the Voice. Since February 2008 Hentoff has been a weekly contributing columnist at WorldNetDaily.com.
...
Hentoff is known as a civil libertarian, free speech activist, anti-death penalty advocate, anti-abortion advocate. He supported the 2003 invasion of Iraq and is a supporter of Israel.
...
Hentoff holds what mainstream media may describe as idiosyncratic views. He espouses generally liberal views on domestic policy and civil liberties, but in the 1980s, he began articulating more socially conservative positionsopposed to abortion, voluntary euthanasia, and the selective medical treatment of severely disabled infants. Hentoff argued that a consistent life ethic should be the viewpoint of a genuine civil libertarian, arguing that all human rights are at risk when the rights of any one group of people are diminished, that human rights are interconnected, and people deny others' human rights at their own peril. After he emerged as an opponent of abortion, several of his colleagues at The Village Voice stopped speaking to him.
Go ahead and defend him, if you choose.