Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

True Blue Door

(2,969 posts)
Sat Sep 27, 2014, 02:49 AM Sep 2014

Calling for terrorism at the polls and then saying "Kidding!" a week later is not a "hoax."

Here's the long and short of it:

A Facebook page purporting to belong to a right-wing Wisconsin militia called for armed interdiction of Democratic voters at the polls in November, specifically to target those who signed the recall petition against Scott Walker. It contained images of firearms, target practice at shooting ranges, and black voters standing in line. Days later, when this call for terrorism at the polls drew exactly the kind of attention we would expect, the page was edited to say essentially "Just kidding! Stupid libruls r too sensitive!" Or more literally what it said was: "You’ve Been Trolled by Journalists with Zero Credibility" and claimed "This page was made by one person. No conspiracy, no militia, no paid funding ... just one guy."

Even if it was just one guy, that doesn't change what it represents, and certainly doesn't mitigate the context of nationwide right-wing terrorist murder sprees that have happened on a steady basis over the past several years. Not to mention the context of Jim Crow 2.0 election-rigging measures in numerous states and lawless 5-member Supreme Tort rulings dismantling civil rights. Seriously, if this guy or guys behind this were Muslims who openly support ISIS and said they were going to blow up a skyscraper, then said "Kidding!" a week later, no one would be saying "Phew! It's just a hoax!"

So what the fuck is going on when that's the reaction here, on Democratic Underground, to something like this? If - IF, goddammit - the subsequent claim to be just one person is true and not a defensive reaction to the response, then it's at best an example of stochastic terrorism: Cowardly demagogues and propagandists continually pushing fantasies of violent confrontation and terrorist intimidation through rhetoric and only partly backing down when they get blowback. It leads to real incidents. We know this for a fact, because by this point too many mass-killers have been found to be motivated by right-wing talk radio and Fox News rantings.

But...why the fuck would we just accept the word for it of the kind of person/people who would do something like this that they are just one person and were "just kidding"? That's utterly insane. It's as if the reality of such a thing, even at its most benign possible interpretation, is just too awful for some people to confront. Well, I'm sorry the world isn't a safe and comfy kindergarten, but we have to deal with things like this. The right-wing is increasingly terroristic in this country, increasingly justifying the label of cancervatives, and this is just a manifestation of where their minds are running these days - if not their plans. Don't hide from it.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Calling for terrorism at the polls and then saying "Kidding!" a week later is not a "hoax." (Original Post) True Blue Door Sep 2014 OP
The damage has been done as some voters will stay away from the polls. Scuba Sep 2014 #1
interesting. same thing with threat to watson. once found the threat a hoax, that was suppose to seabeyond Sep 2014 #2
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
1. The damage has been done as some voters will stay away from the polls.
Sat Sep 27, 2014, 07:03 AM
Sep 2014

Hopefully the asshat(s) behind this will face charges.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
2. interesting. same thing with threat to watson. once found the threat a hoax, that was suppose to
Sat Sep 27, 2014, 09:18 AM
Sep 2014

make every all fine. the reality, is that threat was real to her and every woman and left an impression whether real or no follow up to threat coming.

that would be the terrorizing part of it all.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Calling for terrorism at ...