General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBernie Sanders: Here's why Americans don't feel good about the economy:
aspirant
(3,533 posts)Going behind the curtain to reveal the Wizard of Oz.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Starter. Next he needs to contact other members to get the necessary votes to pass the bill and do the leg work to get the House on board with the increase. Those who are taking the minimum wage jobs knows there us not enough. It is time for Congress to step up and do some work.
Autumn
(45,079 posts)Here's a link for anyone interested
http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/recent-business/raise-the-minimum-wage0212
Autumn
(45,079 posts)BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)But I think it's funny when people blast Senator Sanders, of all people, for not fighting for the working class.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Autumn
(45,079 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)fasttense
(17,301 posts)Yes a half decent minimum wage would help a little. But good paying jobs would be better. So since corporations won't provide those jobs then the government should. The government should be hiring at high wages to make up for the failures of capitalism. Just like the government was the lender of last resort to save the banksters so they should be the employer of last resort to save the American middle class.
Funny how no one dare introduce a bill like that.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)The Senate voted on Wednesday against going ahead on a bill that would gradually increase the federal minimum wage from $7.25 an hour to $10.10 an hour, another rejection for legislation that has been a major focus of the Democrats' 2014 midterm campaign.
The final vote count was 54 to 42, with Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.), who supports the legislation, taking the procedural step of voting against the bill so that he can reintroduce it at a later time.
In a news conference following the vote, top Democrats vowed to reintroduce the bill this year.
"Soon," said Sen. Charles E. Schumer, (D-N.Y.), as he ducked into an elevator following the vote. "Sometime soon."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/04/30/senate-republicans-block-minimum-wage-increase-bill/
Brigid
(17,621 posts)And judge accordingly.
TheMastersNemesis
(10,602 posts)And even lower wages. They support the Reaganomic trickle down business model. Obama cannot change that by themselves. And we must change our trade policies.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)I got into MANY arguments with the right-wingers down here about "Jobs" does not equal "make a living"
Some of them wanted to actually hit me. I'm not kidding.
Wella
(1,827 posts)I've really had it with their disingenuousness on this matter.
geretogo
(1,281 posts)before Reagen . The Right wing owns and controls radio , TV , magazines , news papers and then they
tell you you should hate government and the " Liberal Media " and then put all your trust in Ayn Rand and
a hand full of Oligarchs to govern you . They are modern pied pipers leading the the sheep over the cliff .
geretogo
(1,281 posts)and Ayn Randian completely insane and civilization destroying policies that will continue until there are
millions in the streets threatening to bring the corrupt system down if there is no repudiation of these policies .
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Republican policies completely neglect the General Welfare of the American people.
geretogo
(1,281 posts)Maineman
(854 posts)For several years now, many new businesses have made a small number of people very rich (Microsoft, Apple, Google, Facebook, Twitter, and many others (you know many of them). Most are internet based and require relatively few workers. The only way to deal with this new paradigm is for many people to become part owners. Of course, many have no way of buying stock, so there needs to be a mechanism for creating broad ownership, probably government based processes and programs. Ownership that produces dividend payments would be good. Currently all the money in the economy is going to a few at the top. That needs to change. THAT NEEDS TO CHANGE!
taught_me_patience
(5,477 posts)thereby owning equity shares of any public company in the United States. Many even have dividends too! Commissions are extremely low. However, it might take about an hour of your time or so, though.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)the SSA says the Median yearly income of wage earners is $28 K for 2013. That is alot of poor working folks, but heh,,,, the Corps don't mind sharing some those record breaking profits with upper management executives.
progree
(10,907 posts)Last edited Mon Dec 1, 2014, 12:48 AM - Edit history (1)
http://www.ssa.gov/oact/cola/central.htmland the median to average ratio is falling -- an indicator of growing inequality.
It would be interesting to see the above adjusted for inflation.
This shows the actual distribution of net compensation (the top of it also defines what "net compensation" is -- it includes deferred compensation employer contributions, but doesn't include any benefits other than that, from what I can tell):
http://www.ssa.gov/cgi-bin/netcomp.cgi?year=2013
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)... through his leadership.
I like Bernie. I think he has the right take on the issues most of the time. I think he would bring something to the table in a Presidential run.
But this kind of attempt by him to offer some oblique criticism of the President doesn't work because as a sitting senator, it's just as much up to Bernie to try to fix it.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)on non proliferation and run for President. Clinton, about the same.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Being a senator is a powerful position. Let's see it.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)Autumn
(45,079 posts)Because it's up to him to fix ya know, stuff. Yeah I got a big kick out of that one. The democrats in the house and senate get a pass, a democratic president gets a pass. Yeah Bernie can't lead and has done nothing that shows he could president his way out of a paper bag. I haven't seen Fox in a decade but the tactic seems familiar. I often wonder where do they get this shit to pass around.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)for the time being. Here is what happened.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/04/30/senate-republicans-block-minimum-wage-increase-bill/
Sanders does not need to introduce a bill. It was already introduced and defeated by Republicans. One Democratic senator was absent at the vote.
One_Life_To_Give
(6,036 posts)There is no magic bullet that will fix the economy. Atleast not one less than 1000 pages and then you don't want to know what the lobbyists would hide in there. Providing several million $30/hr + benefit jobs is not going to happen without change in multiple area's. From H1B/Immigration programs, education, code compliance, to Corporate culture and tax structure. Creating an environment favorable to the generation of such jobs will take alot of work. Too many parts of the current structure favor the status quo.
cheapdate
(3,811 posts)doc03
(35,332 posts)40 years to save middle class jobs? The Democratic party has totally abandoned its Union base and has done all it could to
eliminate manufacturing jobs.
demigoddess
(6,640 posts)and even more war, and again more war.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)santroy79
(193 posts)as our next President !
dotymed
(5,610 posts)we the people would have to work our asses off. Maybe then we would see if elections count.
no_hypocrisy
(46,097 posts)in any way.
Listen to his show, Economic Update: http://www.democracyatwork.info/radio/
Javaman
(62,530 posts)even if he doesn't run, I'll write him in.
clarice
(5,504 posts)Avalux
(35,015 posts)It's an outworn term that really doesn't exist in the present economy. What does a middle class wage look like anyway?