General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRobert W. McChesney: "Capitalism as We Know It Has Got to Go"
Robert W. McChesney: "Capitalism as We Know It Has Got to Go"
Tuesday, 30 December 2014 10:32
By Robert McChesney, Monthly Review Press | Book Excerpt
The following is the first chapter of Blowing the Roof Off, "America, I Do Mind Dying":
Please, mister foreman, slow down that assembly line
I don't mind working but I do mind dying.
JOE L. CARTER, "Please, Mister Foreman," blues song, 1965
THESE ARE PERILOUS TIMES for capitalism, the reigning political economic system of the United States and the world. The economy is stagnating, and Mother Earth is gravely ill. In the second decade of the twenty-first century, we face widening economic inequality, plutocratic governance, endless militarism and mounting planetary ecological degradation.
Not many years ago, this would have sounded hyperbolic to many people. But today, it is not just radicals who are sounding alarm bells. Nobel Prizewinning economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman has been writing about secular stagnation in the past year in remarkably alarmist terms, arguing that the rich economies may be caught in decades of slow growth. No less an establishment figure than former World Bank Chief Economist and U.S. Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers warned the International Monetary Fund in 2013 that the United States and the advanced economies may be facing a generation of stagnation.(1)
Moreover, some of our leading social and natural scientists have recently established the magnitude of the difficulties we face with cutting-edge research. There is now wide agreement on what the influential French economist Thomas Piketty has demonstrated, which is that growing economic inequality is built into the core logic of the capitalist system.(2) His research also suggests that a new oligarchy of inherited wealth has come to dominate society and the state, and the process is accelerated by stagnation. According to Krugman, writing on Piketty's discoveries, "We're going to look back nostalgically on the early 21st century when you could still at least have the pretense that the wealthy actually earned their wealth. And, you know, by the year 2030, it'll all be inherited." Indeed, "we are seeing not only great disparities in income and wealth, but we're seeing them get entrenched. We're seeing them become inequalities that will be transferred across generations. We are becoming very much the kind of society we imagine we're nothing like." 3)
In other acclaimed new empirical research, Martin Gilens and Benjamin Page examined 1,800 policy decisions made by the U.S. government between 1981 and 2002:
The central point that emerges from our research is that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on U.S. government policy, while mass-based interest groups and average citizens have little or no independent influence. . . . Ordinary citizens might often be observed to "win" (that is, to get their preferred policy outcomes) even if they had no independent effect whatsoever on policy making, if elites (with whom they often agree) actually prevail.(4)
In short, when organized wealth wants one thing and the mass of the people wants another, money winsalways. "Democracy" has been reduced to powerless people rooting for their favored billionaire or corporate lobby to advance their values and interests, and hoping such a billionaire exists and that they get lucky. Doesn't that sound like the oligarchy that was explicitly rejected in this nation's founding in Philadelphia in 1776, and reaffirmed in Lincoln's speech at the bloodstained earth of Gettysburg some four score and seven years later? ..................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://truth-out.org/progressivepicks/item/28273-robert-w-mcchesney-capitalism-as-we-know-it-has-got-to-go
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Not just Wall Street. Profits. Corporate Profits.
Unknown Beatle
(2,672 posts)the scourge of SOCIALISM that repugs dread. But the repugs loves 'em some corporate socialism where they take from the middle class and poor and give to the rich.
antigop
(12,778 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)niyad
(113,284 posts)project_bluebook
(411 posts)the DOW is over 18000!
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)oblivion...
silverweb
(16,402 posts)[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]Bookmarked for later.
marmar
(77,078 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)I think Piketty started a revolution in economic thought. The problem now is how do we get political solutions when the wealthy have so much political power and continuing growth in the inequality that creates that power is built into the system?
The only answer that I can see is someone wealthy and powerful with a conscience and actual concern beyond their own well-being using their influence to cause political change, particularly regarding taxes and redistribution.
marmar
(77,078 posts).... for way too many years to even question capitalism as it's practiced in the U.S. was considered heresy.
vive la commune
(94 posts)xchrom
(108,903 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)We should start by nationalizing health care.
On a local level, more places should pass living wage ordinances.
And my dream: minimum living income for all.