Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
Fri Jan 9, 2015, 10:09 AM Jan 2015

Beyond the minimum: What’s next for raising wages?

Beyond the minimum: What’s next for raising wages?
1/9/2015

In a year of major Republican victories, the campaign to raise the minimum wage has been the rare success story for the left. Twenty states will see a minimum wage increase in 2015—more than half because state legislatures passed a law or voters approved a ballot initiative to do so.

Progressive advocates say other, broader reforms need to be in the spotlight as well. And the pressure to focus on middle-class incomes and wages will only grow as the 2016 election draws nearer, and candidates work to court the broader electorate.



The AFL-CIO has its own plans for moving forward. At Wednesday’s event, the labor union announced a new campaign in four states holding early presidential contests—Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada—intended to hold 2016 candidates accountable for their position on income inequality and proposals that would help raise ordinary workers’ wages.

“Raising wages is the single standard by which leadership will be judged,” AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka said in a speech at the summit.

Whether or not she runs in 2016, Massachusetts Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren is likely to become a liberal standard-bearer on the issue. At the AFL-CIO event, she made it clear that her focus is squarely on raising middle-class incomes, mentioning the minimum wage only in passing.

“For more than 30 years, Washington has far too often advanced policies that hammer America’s middle class even harder,” Warren said. “Look at the choices Washington has made, the choices that have left America’s middle class in a deep hole.”

Warren’s suggested reforms were broad—infrastructure investment, corporate tax hikes and trade policy (an issue that’s pitted her against the White House). But the idea that drew the biggest reaction from the crowd was the one most directly connected to wages: workers’ right to be fully paid for what they earn.

“We believe in enforcing labor laws, so that workers get overtime pay and pensions that are fully funded,” Warren said, to big cheers and applause.

It’s an issue that could appeal to a broader swath of the public. “The minimum wage is about a floor, but it doesn’t raise wages for the vast majority of workers. Insuring basic workers’ rights enables wages to raise throughout the spectrum,” said David Madland, managing director of economic policy for the Center for American Progress....

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/beyond-the-minimum-whats-next-raising-wages

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
3. The "I" on those states means they automatically do inflation adjustments
Fri Jan 9, 2015, 10:37 AM
Jan 2015

Which is better than not doing that

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
4. Other than a meager handful between the Senate and the House, I don't think there is any beyond.
Fri Jan 9, 2015, 10:59 AM
Jan 2015

TeaPubliKlans want to lower or eradicate the floor while reducing wages toward the global average and Democrats believe in a higher floor while reducing wages toward the global average.

I like the Democratic plan a little better but it is well south of despicable and something I not only can't support but must stridently oppose even in an environment where the other guy wants to pull out the floor too.

Hey, I'm not saying I don't appreciate the less soulless effort to strip mine the economy, lower the standard of living, sell out the commons, take sovereignty away from the citizens to give it, greatly magnified to the corporations, and then slowly reduce the stature of "the small people" from citizen to consumer to serf to wage slave and fodder, cannon or otherwise.


I believe we have been sold out on this since even before Reagan, I believe the war on inflation was always a war on wages WIN wasn't about whip inflation now but rather wages increase NEVER! and that really haven't, buying power peaked a long time ago.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
5. “We believe in enforcing labor laws, so that workers get overtime pay and pensions that are fully
Fri Jan 9, 2015, 12:12 PM
Jan 2015

funded," Warren said.

Sounds like a great first step. And it is something that the administration can do without action from a republican congress.

Increases in infrastructure spending and tax hikes on corporations and the rich (all unlikely, of course, with a republican congress) are also mentioned and are good ideas. Longer term, I think legal action to empower unions, while again subject to republican opposition, would go a long way to raising overall wages.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Beyond the minimum: What’...