Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts) Thu Jan 15, 2015, 12:20 AM Jan 2015

1

Bill O'Reilly: Obama is putting the United States in grave danger because he won't say two words

Do wingers actually believe this shit? Uttering two words will keep America safe?

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/oreilly-obama-putting-us-in-grave-danger-by-not-saying-radical-islam/

O’Reilly: Obama Putting Us in ‘Grave Danger’ by Not Saying ‘Radical Islam’

Bill O’Reilly tonight said that by not showing a willingness to say “radical Islam” in public, President Obama and those who agree with him are putting the U.S. in “grave danger.” O’Reilly claimed to know exactly why no one in the Obama administration will use that phrase in reference to the Paris attack or other acts of terrorism.

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bill O'Reilly: Obama is putting the United States in grave danger because he won't say two words (Original Post) Cali_Democrat Jan 2015 OP

i guess all the Terrorists will just crap their pants if Obama uses those words? VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #1

Sure does not sound like having O'Reilly saying radical islam is having any effect. Thinkingabout Jan 2015 #2

Mindless blowhard. nruthie Jan 2015 #3

I've got 2 words for... 3catwoman3 Jan 2015 #4

Wait...let me guess... jaysunb Jan 2015 #6

Well, I was more inclined to... 3catwoman3 Jan 2015 #7

Or, we could combine our efforts... 3catwoman3 Jan 2015 #12

instead, Obama is thinking those 2 words we all are at O'Reilly, "f* off" uppityperson Jan 2015 #5

This message was self-deleted by its author A-Schwarzenegger Jan 2015 #8

Bill O'Reilly put cognitive thought in danger because we can't restrict him to only two words. Half-Century Man Jan 2015 #9

He said Benghazi was a terrorist act rather than an act of terrorism. He calls the attacks doc03 Jan 2015 #10

*sigh* sakabatou Jan 2015 #11

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)

1. i guess all the Terrorists will just crap their pants if Obama uses those words?

Reply to Cali_Democrat (Original post)

Thu Jan 15, 2015, 12:24 AM

Jan 2015

Zalwahiri will just give up!

ISIL will just self-arrest!

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)

2. Sure does not sound like having O'Reilly saying radical islam is having any effect.

Reply to Cali_Democrat (Original post)

Thu Jan 15, 2015, 12:37 AM

Jan 2015

nruthie

(466 posts)

3. Mindless blowhard.

Reply to Cali_Democrat (Original post)

Thu Jan 15, 2015, 12:46 AM

Jan 2015

Fox News is to blame for putting the U.S. in danger.Their around-the-clock propaganda has poisoned the entire country.

3catwoman3

(23,985 posts)

4. I've got 2 words for...

Reply to Cali_Democrat (Original post)

Thu Jan 15, 2015, 12:46 AM

Jan 2015

...Mr. O"Reilly, and you only get one guess as to which 2 words they are.

jaysunb

(11,856 posts)

6. Wait...let me guess...

Reply to 3catwoman3 (Reply #4)

Thu Jan 15, 2015, 12:50 AM

Jan 2015

would it be : ASS HOLE ?

3catwoman3

(23,985 posts)

7. Well, I was more inclined to...

Reply to jaysunb (Reply #6)

Thu Jan 15, 2015, 12:59 AM

Jan 2015

a hearty "FU", but your choice is quite apropos, too.

3catwoman3

(23,985 posts)

12. Or, we could combine our efforts...

Reply to 3catwoman3 (Reply #7)

Thu Jan 15, 2015, 02:47 PM

Jan 2015

...and create a new acronym - FUAH!

(Mr. O'Reilly does not bring out the best in me.)

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)

5. instead, Obama is thinking those 2 words we all are at O'Reilly, "f* off"

Reply to Cali_Democrat (Original post)

Thu Jan 15, 2015, 12:48 AM

Jan 2015

Response to Cali_Democrat (Original post)

A-Schwarzenegger This message was self-deleted by its author.

Half-Century Man

(5,279 posts)

9. Bill O'Reilly put cognitive thought in danger because we can't restrict him to only two words.

Reply to Cali_Democrat (Original post)

Thu Jan 15, 2015, 01:08 AM

Jan 2015

Mahatma Gandhi would have wanted to kick BOs ass.

doc03

(35,337 posts)

10. He said Benghazi was a terrorist act rather than an act of terrorism. He calls the attacks

Reply to Cali_Democrat (Original post)

Thu Jan 15, 2015, 01:20 AM

Jan 2015

in France terrorism now he should have said it was radical Islam instead. They find something matter what.

sakabatou

(42,152 posts)

11. *sigh*

Reply to Cali_Democrat (Original post)

Thu Jan 15, 2015, 01:21 AM

Jan 2015

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bill O'Reilly: Obama is p...