General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEminent domain fine and dandy for Keystone-obsessed GOP
By Jane Kleeb - 01/14/15 08:07 PM EST
Republicans have lost their way (Key court approves Keystones route through Nebraska, Jan. 9). It used to be that property rights were a conservative value, but when oil company interests are involved, apparently property rights mean nothing. You might expect Republicans to bend over backward to help farmers and ranchers prevent the taking of their land by a foreign corporation. But in the case of Keystone XL, those farmers and ranchers have been ignored and belittled as fringe extremists. The obsession over trying to take down President Obama has led the GOP down a path of hypocrisy.
After the famous Kelo eminent domain case in 2004, House Republicans passed a bill that made it clear farmland owners need to have long-term certainty regarding their property rights in order to make the investment decisions to commit land to these uses. The bill went on to say, the use of eminent domain to take farmland and other rural property for economic development threatens liberty, rural economies, and the economy of the United States.
Placing a high-risk, high-pressure, maximum-capacity pipeline that has tar sands and chemicals like benzene is anything but adding certainty to a farmer. Helping expand tar sands adds to carbon pollution, which leads to climate change also something not on the good list for farmers livelihoods and rural economies.
http://thehill.com/opinion/letters/229561-eminent-domain-fine-and-dandy-for-keystone-obsessed-gop
The only principle the GOP follows is "Who will pay me the most?"
belzabubba333
(1,237 posts)pampango
(24,692 posts)It is a "diabolical socialist plot against property owners" when it is used to further liberal programs and projects or other uses that do not benefit 'me' and my corporate interests.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)And that the eminent domain land seized is for a totally foreign nations' largest integration energy company??
What's up with that , eh?
2naSalit
(86,579 posts)NPR did a "series" on the KXL this past week and it was a pretty stern argument for the pipeline while inserting fear of the oil market situation of late...
ETA: There was a brief mention, during the last installment, that did cover the eminent domain issue and there was a spokesperson of the group who lost the suit. That person did mention the issues of the aquifer; the proximity of the pipeline to homes and wells farmland; that any spills or damages would be landholder liability - those who had this foisted upon them would be liable for any problems; the fact that it won't be marketed in the US; the jobs it won't create... he crammed a lot in that short segment... but that's about all of the other side's view that I heard.
just sayin'