General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRand Paul looks to ‘dissolve’ the United Nations
By Steve Benen
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/rand-paul-looks-dissolve-the-united-nations
To be sure, this doesnt come as too big a surprise. The United Nations is a popular foil for conspiracy theorists, and Rand Paul in particular has made some truly bizarre allegations about the world body in recent years.
In 2013, for example, the GOP senator wrote a letter on behalf of a radical gun group in which Paul argued that the United Nations intends to force the United States to CONFISCATE and DESTROY ALL unauthorized civilian firearms, while creating an INTERNATIONAL gun registry, setting the stage for full-scale gun CONFISCATION.
The capitalized words originally appeared in Pauls 2013 ridiculous letter; I didnt capitalize them for emphasis.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(175,770 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Could he lave the UN or force it to move elsewhere, quite possibly.
The guy is speaking to his tinfoil wrapped constituents.
shenmue
(38,506 posts)pampango
(24,692 posts)http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/plagiarizing#.lqq5qZN0r
All of that is becoming somewhat mainstream in republican circles. Withdrawing from those international institutions in the name of 'national sovereignty' was in many GOP state platforms in 2008 and 2012.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,776 posts)lpbk2713
(42,773 posts)The guy's a dipshit.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Gallup
Paladin
(28,283 posts)That brain-dead bit of gun militant hysteria has been around for years and years. And Rand Paul was still pimping it in 2013? Unbelievable......
The2ndWheel
(7,947 posts)That's why the US government can bombs whatever country we want, and nothing happens. If any other country were to do that, sanctions and/or bombing commence. But since the US military is the only reason anyone listens to the UN, and even then it's iffy, we can do as we want.
The US taxpayer pays for the de facto global military(since the UN ain't going to do it, what with all the competing interests), while those in Europe pay for social programs. The US likes it that way, because the fewer potential military threats the better. Europe likes it that way, because they get all the good stuff for their taxes.
Johonny
(20,945 posts)Thus leaving international leadership of the free world to who?
These are the same people that complain about Obama's leadership on the world stage.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Don't have something intelligent to say just yell about the UN. I thought this battle had been fought and won by now.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)eat the last of his brain, isn't it?