HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Who will be Hillary's run...

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 12:40 PM

 

Who will be Hillary's running mate next year?

Personally, I'm pimping for Tom Brady, whom, sixteen days from now, will demonstrate that he is the Greatest Quarterback of All Time. But I'm also a realist, thus...


13 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited
Booker
1 (8%)
O'Malley
1 (8%)
Sanders
0 (0%)
Warren
0 (0%)
Other (please specify)
11 (85%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

96 replies, 3304 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 96 replies Author Time Post
Reply Who will be Hillary's running mate next year? (Original post)
Stephen Retired Jan 2015 OP
Erose999 Jan 2015 #1
InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2015 #41
Skink Jan 2015 #2
MohRokTah Jan 2015 #11
SidDithers Jan 2015 #18
MoonRiver Jan 2015 #21
Gothmog Jan 2015 #34
former9thward Jan 2015 #48
elfin Jan 2015 #73
Rosco T. Jan 2015 #77
joshcryer Jan 2015 #88
cherokeeprogressive Jan 2015 #3
cloudbase Jan 2015 #4
winetourdriver Jan 2015 #5
blackcrow Jan 2015 #6
Peregrine Took Jan 2015 #80
LeftyMom Jan 2015 #7
Stephen Retired Jan 2015 #90
LeftyMom Jan 2015 #91
thelordofhell Jan 2015 #8
elleng Jan 2015 #62
Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2015 #9
Octafish Jan 2015 #22
AtomicKitten Jan 2015 #83
L0oniX Jan 2015 #95
ChosenUnWisely Jan 2015 #10
MohRokTah Jan 2015 #12
ChosenUnWisely Jan 2015 #15
MohRokTah Jan 2015 #16
ChosenUnWisely Jan 2015 #17
MohRokTah Jan 2015 #19
ChosenUnWisely Jan 2015 #20
The_Commonist Jan 2015 #35
Autumn Jan 2015 #56
ChosenUnWisely Jan 2015 #82
earthside Jan 2015 #76
karynnj Jan 2015 #38
cyberswede Jan 2015 #86
Fearless Jan 2015 #46
MohRokTah Jan 2015 #47
Fearless Jan 2015 #49
MohRokTah Jan 2015 #50
Fearless Jan 2015 #51
MohRokTah Jan 2015 #53
Fearless Jan 2015 #54
daleanime Jan 2015 #55
Autumn Jan 2015 #60
backwoodsbob Jan 2015 #57
TeamPooka Jan 2015 #89
Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2015 #24
ChosenUnWisely Jan 2015 #25
Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2015 #27
ChosenUnWisely Jan 2015 #29
Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2015 #31
ChosenUnWisely Jan 2015 #33
Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2015 #36
benz380 Jan 2015 #32
Renew Deal Jan 2015 #81
wyldwolf Jan 2015 #96
tabbycat31 Jan 2015 #13
brooklynite Jan 2015 #14
blackcrow Jan 2015 #85
MineralMan Jan 2015 #23
hrmjustin Jan 2015 #26
Man from Pickens Jan 2015 #28
benz380 Jan 2015 #30
bigwillq Jan 2015 #37
The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2015 #39
deaniac21 Jan 2015 #40
madinmaryland Jan 2015 #63
Motown_Johnny Jan 2015 #42
DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2015 #43
CentralMass Jan 2015 #44
Fearless Jan 2015 #45
SummerSnow Jan 2015 #52
femmocrat Jan 2015 #64
elleng Jan 2015 #66
Mike Nelson Jan 2015 #58
CK_John Jan 2015 #59
backwoodsbob Jan 2015 #61
Warren DeMontague Jan 2015 #65
hifiguy Jan 2015 #67
HappyMe Jan 2015 #68
Basic LA Jan 2015 #69
shenmue Jan 2015 #70
crazylikafox Jan 2015 #71
Thinkingabout Jan 2015 #72
Vattel Jan 2015 #74
Logical Jan 2015 #75
SheilaT Jan 2015 #78
Corruption Inc Jan 2015 #79
genwah Jan 2015 #84
Katashi_itto Jan 2015 #87
Erose999 Jan 2015 #92
L0oniX Jan 2015 #93
benz380 Jan 2015 #94

Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 12:46 PM

1. Well, Booker is kind of a 3rd way neolib, so probably him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Erose999 (Reply #1)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 04:42 PM

41. Along those lines, Im bettin Hillary pix her "brotha from anotha motha" Jebbie Bush as her VP after he loses the Rethug nomination.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 12:54 PM

2. Julian Castro

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skink (Reply #2)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 02:11 PM

11. Yep, agreed 100%. eom

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skink (Reply #2)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 02:27 PM

18. I think it'll be Castro too...nt

Sid

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skink (Reply #2)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 02:34 PM

21. That's who I want!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skink (Reply #2)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 03:12 PM

34. The Texas Democratic Party has printed some Clinton/Castro 2016 bumper stickers

We don't care which Castro brother is on the ticket but I would favor Julian

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skink (Reply #2)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 04:57 PM

48. Not a chance.

Castro does not give her Texas and brings nothing else to the ticket.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skink (Reply #2)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 06:24 PM

73. No doubt about that for me

Young, accomplished enough, Latino, energetic, smart, personable etc. etc.

Unless some troubling skeletons pop up, he's the one.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skink (Reply #2)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 06:53 PM

77. yup, almost a no brainer n/m

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skink (Reply #2)

Sat Jan 17, 2015, 12:30 AM

88. Easy call.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 12:55 PM

3. Other: M$M n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 12:56 PM

4. Hillary has to win the nomination first.

We're putting the cart before the horse at this point.

I believe she's expecting a coronation in 2016 just as she did in 2008. That might not work out very well for her. Add to that the Clinton/Bush fatigue among the voters, and it's not looking as good this time around.

As the great American philosopher Lawrence Peter Berra said, "It ain't over 'til it's over."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 12:57 PM

5. running mate

One of the Castro brothers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 01:02 PM

6. Benny Netanyahu

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to blackcrow (Reply #6)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 07:22 PM

80. "Bibi!" Of course! n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 01:07 PM

7. She's not going to be in the process that long.

And Mr. Bundchen is nowhere near the QB Joe Cool was.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LeftyMom (Reply #7)

Sat Jan 17, 2015, 01:56 PM

90. Come on, man!

 

Why ya gotta be going there? Montana is great; no argument! But fifteen days from now, when Brady is hoisting the Lombardi Trophy over his head, he'll have played in 6 Super Bowls and won 4. How is that not the Greatest Ever???

Why, man? Just...why?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Reply #90)

Sat Jan 17, 2015, 09:27 PM

91. How many did Joe lose?

Exactly.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 02:01 PM

8. Gen. Wesley Clark

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to thelordofhell (Reply #8)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 05:20 PM

62. Oh, if ONLY, lord!

He should be Sec of Defense (or State or National Security Adviser.)

I don't think he has enough/any political clout, to recommend him as VP.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 02:03 PM

9. Whoever Goldman Sachs approves.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tierra_y_Libertad (Reply #9)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 02:36 PM

22. +1

"Summers looked at Stiglitz like Stiglitz was some kind of naive fool who'd read too many civics books."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tierra_y_Libertad (Reply #9)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 07:55 PM

83. Jamie Dimon

 

He'll help her unwind the reforms, anemic as they are, that aren't being sensitive to Wall Street's needs. The Clintons' bookend coup d'etat against meaningful regulation will then be complete.

Clinton/Dimon 2016

http://m.motherjones.com/politics/2014/06/hillary-clintons-goldman-sachs-problem

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tierra_y_Libertad (Reply #9)

Tue Jan 20, 2015, 12:13 PM

95. +2

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 02:10 PM

10. Why does it really matter? No matter whom she picks many democrats won't vote for her.

 

No Hillary vote from me and I know I am not the only one.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ChosenUnWisely (Reply #10)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 02:12 PM

12. We'll miss you when election season hits. eom

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MohRokTah (Reply #12)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 02:18 PM

15. No you won't.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ChosenUnWisely (Reply #15)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 02:20 PM

16. Sure we will. You'll no longer be able to post once Election Season hits.

 

As soon as it's clear that the candidate is chosen, everybody on DU MUST get behind the Democratic nominee.

No exceptions.

It's the rules.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MohRokTah (Reply #16)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 02:25 PM

17. Actually I don't have to do diddly squat

 

I just can't make posts against the 'democratic' candidate.

Actually if she is the candidate, I will end up leaving the party I have been a member of since 1975, because the party will have changed to the point that it no longer reflects my values.

But I can still post here if I want.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ChosenUnWisely (Reply #17)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 02:27 PM

19. Ah, but I've saved a link to your post above.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MohRokTah (Reply #19)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 02:29 PM

20. Damn you really need a life, enjoy saving the link!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ChosenUnWisely (Reply #20)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 03:14 PM

35. Yeah, that was pretty weird.

"...everybody on DU MUST get behind the Democratic nominee. No exceptions."

I just kept quiet when Kerry/Edwards were the nominees. I didn't MUST do anything.

And of course, the 2008 primaries made this place just about the worst place on the internet. I just disappeared from here for much of the year.

And the truth is that I haven't voted for a "Democrat" in years.
In my state (New York), a candidate can be on more than one party ticket at once. I always vote Working Families Party, because I think the Democratic Party sucks. So, I've never helped elect a Republican, but I also have let the Democratic Party know that I think it sucks. It might not be the greatest solution, but it's something.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ChosenUnWisely (Reply #20)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 05:09 PM

56. Don't worry, so he saves the post, if he alerts on it when a nominee is chosen it won't go to a jury

all he will do is harass you with it. People who keep a data base on DUers are hilarious.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Autumn (Reply #56)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 07:35 PM

82. DU STASI?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MohRokTah (Reply #19)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 06:51 PM

76. Are you the scold police?

Some pretty undemocratic posts here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MohRokTah (Reply #16)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 03:26 PM

38. Note quite that strong

In 2004 and 2008, you could not attack, smear or argue against the nominee -- though it often took some pretty negative posts to actually get the poster tombstoned.

However, there were many who continued posting - not really jumping on to the bandwagons - but not breaking that rule. They continued to post on other races, issues and events.

As you know that DU leans left, you know that many are not AT THIS POINT behind Hillary Clinton. She is very much a prohibitive frontrunner. I wonder if it might be better strategy not to threaten other Democrats with the prospect that they will be kicked out when she wins the nomination.

In 2008, the same thing happened and it took a significant event - Bush vetoing the extension of SCHIP - that made me recognize that Kerry was not just being political in 2007 when asked about the 2008 race at a point before he endorsed anyone. His answer was to say on all the issues that were important to him - and he listed many obvious issues, EVERY Democratic candidate - even if not completely where he was - was MUCH better than Every Republican candidate. It took that veto to make me see that NO Democrat would have vetoed that bill and most Republicans would.

For 2016, I likely will be in the same place I would have been had a Democrat I did not want won the nomination. The motivation in that case might just come from comparing what the country would be like under that nominee or the Republican nominee. However, at that point, I will make an effort to identify what I do like in the nominee. This used to go without saying -- ie in 1992, when Clinton was nowhere near my favorite, I did not whine that I was just anybody but Bush -- as Clintonites Begala and Carvelle did in 2004. I looked and found reasons I could use to convince others to vote for Clinton.

However, if this place becomes nasty and seems to gleefully want to exile many long time posters, it might become a less broadbased place. I don't think that will make it better.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MohRokTah (Reply #16)

Sat Jan 17, 2015, 12:23 AM

86. Have you ever been here during a general election?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MohRokTah (Reply #12)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 04:55 PM

46. That sounds an awful lot like a threat.

That's not how to get people to agree with you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fearless (Reply #46)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 04:57 PM

47. A threat?????

 



DU Rules about Democratic nominees, dude.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MohRokTah (Reply #47)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 04:59 PM

49. However what you said comes across as hostile.

Is the point to piss off democratic voters or to convince them to vote for Hillary if she is the nominee?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fearless (Reply #49)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 05:02 PM

50. Just remarking on the poster's remark in the context of DU rules.

 

They know the rules since they agreed to abide by them when they signed up, just like everybody else.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MohRokTah (Reply #50)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 05:03 PM

51. Being passive aggressive and dismissive of another point of view does not help.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fearless (Reply #51)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 05:03 PM

53. I was being honest in the context of this fourm. eom

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MohRokTah (Reply #53)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 05:05 PM

54. To what end?

To tell them to get back in line or not be here a year from now?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MohRokTah (Reply #53)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 05:09 PM

55. Uh huh.....

sure.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MohRokTah (Reply #53)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 05:16 PM

60. Honest?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MohRokTah (Reply #47)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 05:10 PM

57. there is no rule saying you must post positive posts about the nominee

 

You just cant post negative posts about the nominee

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to backwoodsbob (Reply #57)

Sat Jan 17, 2015, 06:01 AM

89. This must be your first time on the internet. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ChosenUnWisely (Reply #10)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 02:51 PM

24. You are not the only one. Neither will I. But, expect a lot of Loyaly Oath demands.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tierra_y_Libertad (Reply #24)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 02:52 PM

25. Bullies always do

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ChosenUnWisely (Reply #25)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 02:57 PM

27. Bullies that demand "Free Speech"....for themselves but not for others.

 

Freedom for supporters of the government only, for members of one party only, no matter how big its membership may be is, no freedom at all. Freedom is always freedom for the man who thinks differently.

Rosa Luxemburg

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tierra_y_Libertad (Reply #27)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 03:00 PM

29. This is a free private forum and the owners of this place can do what they want, free speech

 

does not apply here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ChosenUnWisely (Reply #29)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 03:07 PM

31. About anything?

 

It seems to me to be a bit self-defeating if a political forum curtails political speech.

I have the archaic notion that my vote belongs to me. Not the party, not DU, not to the party purists.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tierra_y_Libertad (Reply #31)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 03:12 PM

33. Well I do too but the owners of the site don't share the same POV

 

If we don't like it we can leave.

The question you need to ask is do you want to participate in an echo chamber or have actual political discussion?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ChosenUnWisely (Reply #33)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 03:16 PM

36. I've been here since 2001 and have yet to have DU tell me how to vote.

 

Some DU'rs seem to think that they have that right but, I ignore them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tierra_y_Libertad (Reply #24)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 03:10 PM

32. Me neither. Tired of all the Corporatist BS.

I will leave that space empty on my ballot and vote for local candidates with real Democratic values.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ChosenUnWisely (Reply #10)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 07:26 PM

81. That would be an unwise choice

At least in the GE.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ChosenUnWisely (Reply #10)

Tue Jan 20, 2015, 12:20 PM

96. Many Democrats never vote for the nominee



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 02:13 PM

13. Not sure yet

I love Booker (who is my senator) but I don't think he's ready for prime time yet (he's one of the few younger Democrats I can see going places, so IMO he needs to stay put for now) and he gives no geographic advantage (unless Christie on the other ticket) as they were both elected statewide in neighboring states.

The other I really like as a running mate (or top of the ticket) is unpopular on DU is Andrew Cuomo, who can't legally be on the same ticket as her (representing the same state).

Of all the possible selections, I like Castro the most. He gives a geographic and demographic advantage that an Elizabeth Warren or Martin O'Malley cannot (young, Latino, southern).

I could care less about a progressive purity test for candidates. According to DU, 2 of the 3 Democratic presidents in my lifetime are DINOs and the 3rd, well I was an infant when he was in office and have zero knowledge of his administration firsthand. I'm not about a purity test, I'm about electability. I'd much rather have a centrist Democrat that can win a national election than run a progressive who will put up Walter Mondale numbers and end up with a President Walker/Christie/Bush/Jindal/Paul/Rubio. If that makes me a DINO so be it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 02:13 PM

14. Not someone from the northeast...

...someone with geographic balance.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #14)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 11:44 PM

85. Democrats in the NorthEast

 

have brain cells. That automatically disqualifies them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 02:43 PM

23. I don't know. I won't guess.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 02:53 PM

26. Brown of OH.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 02:58 PM

28. Who says she's running?

 

If there's one thing Hillary is good at, it's cold, hard, and ruthless calculation. And if she's applying that skill to her own chances of becoming President, she will have to conclude that she doesn't have a realistic shot of pulling it off. She lost the only competitive election she was ever in, even though she started with such a massive lead that she herself believed the nomination to be a fait accompli - then got spanked by a junior Senator.

The only reason she is in the conversation at all is because the options for Democrats right now are so thin.

If Hillary runs, she loses. The obstacles before her - the biggest of which is her own off-putting personality - are far too large for her to overcome.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 03:01 PM

30. Rupert Murdoch

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 03:25 PM

37. Hillary and Brady in the same post. Unrec.

 



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 03:53 PM

39. She won't need one if she isn't nominated.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 04:36 PM

40. The Big Dog

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to deaniac21 (Reply #40)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 05:24 PM

63. ...

?t=1415793660

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 04:46 PM

42. I'm not convinced she will win the nomination.

 


Measuring drapes at this point, or even picking a running mate, is premature.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 04:48 PM

43. Other: Randy of the Redwoods. nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 04:51 PM

44. Goldman Sachs

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 04:53 PM

45. It doesn't matter. It's irrelevent. She will lose. But for kicks let's say ... Lieberman.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 05:03 PM

52. General Wesley Clark

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SummerSnow (Reply #52)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 05:29 PM

64. He will be Secretary of State.

IMO.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SummerSnow (Reply #52)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 05:32 PM

66. You too, Snow!

lordofhell, #8, said the same thing! Makes me happy that some are thinking of him.

As I said, I don't think he has political clout to justify a VP slot, but Sec Def/State/National Security Adviser SHOULD happen! (Should HAVE happened. )

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 05:10 PM

58. There are some good choices...

...I think Warren (gender/age) and Clark (military minded) would be considered much like her to balance the ticket - although I like them both.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 05:10 PM

59. Michelle Obama would be a great candidate.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 05:19 PM

61. Jamie Dimon?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 05:31 PM

65. JESUS

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 05:34 PM

67. Whomever her owners (Goldman) tells her to pick.

 

That is all.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 05:37 PM

68. Ming the Merciless

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HappyMe (Reply #68)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 05:53 PM

69. Haha

Ming doesn't get mentioned enough anymore. Made me laugh.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 05:59 PM

70. I'm hoping for Rep. Conyers

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 06:03 PM

71. Castro

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 06:11 PM

72. O'Malley, Castro brothers,Brown, Warren, Cuomo, too many.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 06:34 PM

74. Given Ferguson and Garner, I think O'Malley is out of the running for anything.

 

Right now Dems are not too fond of police officers violating the rights of citizens and O'Malley got his police force to do that big time in Baltimore when he was mayor.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 06:36 PM

75. SATAN! nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 07:01 PM

78. Wait, she's already been nominated?

 

Did I miss something?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2015, 08:36 PM

84. Ooooh! Oooh! ME! Pick ME!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Sat Jan 17, 2015, 12:25 AM

87. Raul Castro.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Tue Jan 20, 2015, 12:10 PM

92. Kissinger

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Tue Jan 20, 2015, 12:11 PM

93. Lloyd Blankfein

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stephen Retired (Original post)

Tue Jan 20, 2015, 12:11 PM

94. Bank Of America. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread