Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 04:14 PM Jan 2015

Democrats defend naming Muslim Congressman to House Intelligence panel

By Associated Press
January 16, 2015 1:06 PM


WASHINGTON (AP) — Top Democrats are defending their appointment of a Muslim congressman to the House Intelligence Committee after protests erupted on social media, warning the move is dangerous.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi this week appointed Rep. Andre Carson of Indiana to the panel, which oversees the government's intelligence departments and activities. Much of the business that comes before the committee is classified.

Anti-Muslim protests erupted on Twitter and other social media with complaints that exposing American secrets to Carson could be dangerous.

Rep. Adam Schiff of California, the senior Democrat on the panel, called the protests un-American. He said including Muslim Americans in public policy issues is "an essential element in preventing the kind of alienation that has made too many young European Muslims vulnerable to extremism."

http://news.yahoo.com/democrats-defend-naming-muslim-house-intelligence-panel-173656959--politics.html
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

seveneyes

(4,631 posts)
2. As long as our Constitution is defended above and beyond the religion of a lawmaker
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 04:31 PM
Jan 2015

Their belief in fairy tales should not matter.

brer cat

(24,618 posts)
3. They shouldn't have to "defend"
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 04:36 PM
Jan 2015

that appointment. Besides, we already have a Muslim President, so what's one more looking at all the secret stuff?

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
4. No defense is needed, there are no religious tests for office in the US and Carson in in a seat held
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 05:20 PM
Jan 2015

previously by his own grandmother Julia Carson for 5 terms so any questions about his background are absurd and pretty disgusting.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
5. Republicans many not know how to govern but they sure know how to troll.
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 05:26 PM
Jan 2015

"Protests in the social media erupted"? What doesn't "erupt" n the social media?

Is that what the fucking MSM has to do to manufacture a story, how the duck do you defend yourself from the fucking social fucking media?

Made up shit by AP??? Have you seen the approval ratings of fucking Congress lately, asshats?

Archae

(46,354 posts)
12. Some jackass from the AFA is throwing a snitfit...
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 01:09 AM
Jan 2015

She won't be satisfied until Carson is hanged.

Her name is Sandy Rios, and claims Carson is a "terrorist."

riversedge

(70,320 posts)
6. Rep Crowley is spot on...
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 05:42 PM
Jan 2015


Rep. Joseph Crowley of New York, vice chairman of the Democratic Caucus, called on his colleagues to renounce the attacks.

"We will never be able to grow as a society if we allow this kind of hatred and division to go unchecked," Crowley wrote in a letter to his colleagues.

View Comments (9677)

farmbo

(3,122 posts)
8. Post should read:"Yahoo Promotes Silly Right Wing Tantrum"
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 12:48 AM
Jan 2015

Geeze... how is this even a thing in 21st Century America?

JI7

(89,276 posts)
10. he is a member of the LGBT caucus, unlikely islamic terrorists whose position on issues are similar
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 01:01 AM
Jan 2015

to Republican CHristians in the US would have anything to do with him.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
15. Oh so he is "unlikely" to be a terrorist? I guess he is more likely than most...thanks for the analysis
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 10:32 AM
Jan 2015

and thanks for making your views crystal clear. Crystal clear.

Why else in government do you see as "unlikely"?

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
14. how have house and senate Republicans responded?
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 06:00 AM
Jan 2015

I'd expect this kind of nonsense from the internet, but has anyone senior either indulged in or condemned it?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democrats defend naming M...