Isn't it treason

[rogerashton]

to advocate for a war against one's own country? Or if not treason, at least criminal sedition?


http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026106413

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014992314

[NoJusticeNoPeace]

1. yes

[NutmegYankee]

2. Depends on the country and its laws.

The USA has a very strict definition defined in article III section 3 of the U.S. Constitution. Advocating wouldn't meet it. It would be sedition in a classic sense, but current laws are also very limited in this regard due to Free Speech court cases over the last 75 years.

[rogerashton]

4. Of course.

And "advocating" is distinguishable from recruiting -- isn't it?

[NutmegYankee]

7. Usually.

I will say, the second link is clearly protected speech, if annoying as hell. The first one may not be protected speech depending upon that nation's laws. The Queen hasn't been too tolerant of overthrow speech and it is usually banned in all British Commonwealth nations.

[Brother Buzz]

3. But, but, remember, descent is the highest form of patriotic

[Cleita]

5. At least he spelled 'that' word right if not using the right word.

Give him a D-.

[Turbineguy]

6. The dissent

into teabaggery.

[Brother Buzz]

8. You know, initially I thought 'Blue Boy' was punking the Teabaggers

A bit of street theater right in the midst of the enemy. Now I realize his deluxe 'Speil checker®' felt tip marker was his downfall.

[onethatcares]

9. along with his sense of

balance. He must have left the last part of his quote at his moms' house.

[Brother Buzz]

10. Sadley, his deluxe 'Speil checker®' felt tip marker doesn't do font either