Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OneGrassRoot

(22,920 posts)
Thu Jan 22, 2015, 12:26 PM Jan 2015

Must-read Thom Hartmann|Truth-Out article regarding media

I stumbled upon this EXCELLENT Truth-Out piece, written by Thom Hartmann in 2010, but obviously still very relevant now:

http://truth-out.org/archive/component/k2/item/93209:thom-hartmann--an-informed-and-educated-electorate


Through much of the early 1970s, I worked in the newsroom of a radio station in Lansing, Michigan. It had been started and was then run by three local guys: an engineer, a salesman, and a radio broadcaster. They split up the responsibilities like you'd expect, and all were around the building most days and would hang out from time to time with the on-air crew—all except the sales guy. I was forbidden from talking with him because I worked in news. There could be no hint—ever, anywhere—that our radio station had violated the FCC's programming-in-the-public-interest mandate by, for example, my going easy on an advertiser in a news story or promoting another advertiser in a different story. News had to be news, separate from profits and revenue—and if it wasn't, I'd be fired on the spot.

News, in other words, wasn't part of the "free market." It was part of our nation's intellectual commons and thus the price of the station's license.

After Reagan blew up the Fairness Doctrine in 1987, two very interesting things happened. The first was the rise of rightwing hate-speech talk radio, starting with Rush Limbaugh that very year. The second, which really stepped up fast after President Clinton signed the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which further deregulated the broadcast industry, was that the moneylosing news divisions of the Big Three TV networks were taken under the wings of their entertainment divisions—and wrung dry. Foreign bureaus were closed. Reporters were fired. Stories that promoted the wonders of advertisers or other companies (like movie production houses) owned by the same mega-corporations that owned the networks began to appear. And investigative journalism that cast a bright light on corporate malfeasance vanished.

<snip>

The interns were aghast. "Reagan did that?!" one said, incredulous. I said yes and that Bill Clinton then helped the process along to its current sorry state by signing the Telecommunications Act, leading to the creation of the Fox "News" Channel in October 1996 and its now-legal ability to call itself a news operation while baldly promoting what it knows to be falsehoods or distortions.






4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Must-read Thom Hartmann|Truth-Out article regarding media (Original Post) OneGrassRoot Jan 2015 OP
A long read, but definitely worth the time. Arkansas Granny Jan 2015 #1
I'm glad you posted this -- excellent read. pacalo Jan 2015 #2
kick for evening crowd n/t OneGrassRoot Jan 2015 #3
Funny thing, that. Octafish Jan 2015 #4

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
4. Funny thing, that.
Thu Jan 22, 2015, 09:12 PM
Jan 2015

Weird how the rich get richer and no one is supposed to notice, apart from the austerity, secret government surveillance, and wars without end that is.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Must-read Thom Hartmann»