Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHolder/DOJ decide no civil rights violation occured in Ferguson....
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/22/us/justice-department-ferguson-civil-rights-darren-wilson.html?_r=0Well... geez, don't know what to say to this... cops across America probably just started cleaning their side arms.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1059 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Holder/DOJ decide no civil rights violation occured in Ferguson.... (Original Post)
GummyBearz
Jan 2015
OP
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)1. Not true.
They decided there was not enough evidence to pursue charges against Darren Wilson for civil rights violation.
It's an extremely difficult standard to convict on.
About getting that nuance wrong... I apologize for that as I hate when I see someone else do it. The ultimate outcome is still just plain morally depressing to me
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)3. Agreed
Very morally depressing.
I believe there is more evidence in the case of Tamir Rice though, so at least there might be justice there.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)4. That's not even close to what DOJ concluded.
nt
GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)5. Its been pointed out above.
apologies