General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAlmost Half Of U.S. Households Exhaust Their Salaries
"The Federal Reserve has declared economic growth "solid." But several new reports show most Americans are treading along a dangerous financial tightrope, where one slip could be devastating.
"Nearly half of U.S. households 47 percent say they spend all of their income, go into debt or dip into savings to meet their annual expenses, according to an analysis of Fed survey data released Thursday by the Pew Charitable Trusts.
"'They could not withstand a serious financial emergency,' said Diana Elliott, a Pew research manager who co-wrote the analysis. 'That really is the contrast to the macroeconomic story' of a recovering economy."
http://www.kitco.com/news/2015-01-29/Almost-Half-Of-US-Households-Exhaust-Their-Salaries.html
merrily
(45,251 posts)Whatever was the case in 1929, Wall Street invests all over the world, including places where Main Streets jobs have gone. Main Street recovery, for the most part, needs jobs located in the US.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Wall Street has increasingly distanced itself from Main Street with its incessant demands for ever-increasing profits at the expense of local workers. Once a company starts to reach maturity, it has to look for creative ways to appease its Wall Street overlords. That usually entails finding new markets, cutting staff, and/or shipping jobs to low-wage countries. I can think of at least 5 factories in my hometown area that have moved out of the area for the latter two reasons, even though the area has lots of skilled workers who were working for a relatively low (for the US) wage: Emerson Electric, Levi Strauss, Whirlpool, Kraft Foods, Guardian Glass. There are no doubt others, these were just the ones that immediately came to mind.
merrily
(45,251 posts)and all that other pesky stuff that annoys employers. Works better than direct union busting, "right to work" (for next to nothing), etc.
Go Vols
(5,902 posts)There are Union jobs that require help.
http://www.ironworkers.org/jobline
That link is Union shops begging for hands,if highly qualified,you can call and get a job just about anywhere in the country.
Work 20 years and retire with a pension.
Can't offshore US infrastructure.
merrily
(45,251 posts)There is no valid reason on earth that the only jobs Americans can get are in construction and jobs that require them to uproot themselves and their families involuntarily, which causes all kinds of societal problems. But, thanks for letting us know that those jobs exist for those who can manage them.
Have you posted in some of the groups that might be especially grateful for that info?
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Constantly moving from place to place to follow construction work can take a toll on people, especially children.
merrily
(45,251 posts)And you have to have the money to move around and be pretty fit physically.
You get it when young and pick a trade that makes money.
Go Vols
(5,902 posts)and the places I picked were "booming". I would get there and build a name,then bid work so I could stay there until the work ran out or I got a quite better deal elsewhere.
Go Vols
(5,902 posts)I voluntarily traveled around the country for 20+ years building big jobs and retired in my 40's.
Its not for everyone,as I had many hands not make it a half day,but it suited me as I liked a company paid for house,utilities,truck,gas,ect.
Family was with me thru all those years even tho at one point I was raising a 5 and 8 year old alone while running work.
I could have stayed at "home" and maybe made 25 bucks an hour,I wanted more and went out and got it.
I think there was a northern migration,gold rush migration in history,now people willing to work hard are going to ND to get big money.
merrily
(45,251 posts)That is why I suggested posting an OP in a few places, in case people are interested and able. The Labor Movement forum might be good for starters.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)I see so many new cars and things here and knowing the salaries, I wonder how they could POSSIBLY afford them...
Tokyo is one thing, but out here in the sticks, salaries aren't so high.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)I saw an ad from a local bank recently offering new car loans at 1.5% interest, so that might entice some people to try to keep up with the Tanakas. Of course, payday loan company ads are everywhere, and I would guess that those companies are raking it in (although they apparently recently lost a class-action suit for usury and have to pay back some of the money they overcharged).
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Japanese have become as stupid with regards to savings as everyone else.
Pressure to keep up is pretty intense in Japan.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)But there definitely is a lot of pressure to keep up.
Response to Art_from_Ark (Original post)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)I know I sleep sooooo much better........
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)according to the census, 61.4% of households have more than $25,000 in net worth.
That clearly would include at least 8.4% of that 47%. Are these people saying that they dip into savings because they save money in March and then dip into it by December?
Of course, one big way a homeowner adds to their net worth is not directly by saving, but simply by making house payments and having their house appreciate in value.
The linked article closes by talking about the mythical 1%. It says: "Including capital gains, they earned nearly 19 percent of all income in 2013, according to Emmanuel Saez, an economist at University of California at Berkeley. "
Intersting, because according to IRS estimates the 1% earned 22.8% of the income in 2007. Of course, IRS figures are flawed because if a married couple each making $40,000 files separately, which presumably some do, that would register as two taxpayers with $40,000 income instead of a household with $80,000 in income. And if they had a child who made $6,000 a year at their job, that would register as another tax filer with income below $10,000 when actually the family income is $86,000.
Unfortunately the article provides no context, by including what Saez estimated for earlier years.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)and poll results. Obviously we are dealing with miscreants that feel no responsibility for telling the truth.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Lying and manipulation are not just condoned, they are clearly the MO now.
How much of OUR money are they pouring into this lying Oligarchy Theater that now passes for our democracy?
Response to Art_from_Ark (Original post)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Never thought of it that way before, but I do "exhaust my salary"...also known as staying afloat after leaving a bad marriage with the clothes on my back.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)If those 47% had a serious medical problem, they will be in financial ruin...even with Obamacare.
For many plans you need thousands of dollars just to meet the deductible. That doesn't include potential time missed at work. Right there is enough to put the family behind in mortgage or other payments....then it all snowballs.