General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe plot thickens. Hillary ran a bootleg ISP out of her house to handle her email.
https://www.yahoo.com/tech/s/clinton-ran-homebrew-computer-system-official-emails-081111269--politics.htmlWASHINGTON (AP) The computer server that transmitted and received Hillary Clinton's official emails when she was secretary of state traced back to an residential Internet service registered to her family's home in Chappaqua (CHAP'-uh-kwah), New York.
Internet records reviewed by The Associated Press disclosed the service registered to the Clinton home.
The practice of Clinton, a likely Democratic presidential candidate, physically running her own email as a Cabinet-level official is highly unusual.
She has not described her motivation for using a private email account or her own private email server. Most individuals who operate their own email servers are technical experts or users so concerned about issues of privacy and surveillance they take matters into their own hands.
Well that sounds really secure. But I thought the reason she didn't use the government service was because she is technically unsavvy and it was too hard.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Android3.14
(5,402 posts)...to enjoy DU.
We don't have the luxury (or is it the job) of posting all day long.
Hope you understand.
BP2
(554 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)What would that be? A whois search? So this is all about her not using GoDaddy to register a domain?
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)on an unsecure server.
I couldn't do that for my job - I'd be breaking a number of privacy laws and would be fired for negligence.
trumad
(41,692 posts)aquart
(69,014 posts)Personally, I'm going to guess the security of a perpetually-guarded EX-PRESIDENT'S HOME is always going to be a bit more secure than yours or mine.
And we both know there's no way Hillary did that tech shit herself. I'm an experienced, educated user and I couldn't set that up.
This is going to be a long, annoying political season. Perhaps it's time to learn yoga. Or meditation.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)If I ever have a site again, I'll do it that way again. It's how you control your business.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)We're talking about OUR democracy here, not someone's decidedly undemocratic, profit-oriented adventure.
Surely you understand the distinction.
Autumn
(45,066 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)People no longer seem to appreciate the distinction between government and business.
Perhaps because there is none.
Autumn
(45,066 posts)Pardon the expression if you don't know what a Chicken Ranch is here is the info on the Texas Chicken Ranch.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_Ranch_%28Texas%29
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Thanks!
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)that it's an expression.
No, I am not taking questions at this time.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)'Cause all I'm gonna hear in my head until I do is Jim Nabors going "It's a Japanese slingshot!"
Autumn
(45,066 posts)I still like the idea of them having to wear jackets with "sponsors" labels sewn on
"It's a Japanese slingshot!"
longship
(40,416 posts)Anybody can run their own server. There's nothing bootleg about it. When I lived in a SoCal I hosted my own domain name server, mail server, Web server, and even experimented with a VOIP server. All one needs is symmetric bandwidth and a static IP address. It all ran beautifully.
Nothing bootleg about it.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)We're not talking about your home-based business here.
We're talking about the accountability of public servants.
Anyone who has worked with or for a public servant knows they go to great lengths to adhere rules for communication. For example, if you are running for office, you can not use your government e-mail account for campaign purposes. Similarly, if you are conducting the nation's business, you should not be using a private account for your communications.
Try putting the shoe on the other foot, and perhaps you will have a better appreciation for the gravity of the situation:
Madison Thousands of documents unsealed Wednesday link Gov. Scott Walker to a secret email system used in his office that would avoid public scrutiny when he was Milwaukee County executive.
...
Walker used his campaign email to communicate with his county aides, who frequently used their own private email accounts when interacting with Walker or his campaign all of which would shield their discussions from the public.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)Like I did. But it is not a difficult thing to do. I am sure Secy Clinton could easily have the resources to find somebody to put up a mail server and provide bandwidth to support it.
Plus, from what I have recently read right here on DU, the State Department has somewhat notorious unreliable e-mail infrastructure.
So, I do not blame her on this.
And BTW, it does not take much to secure an e-mail server. Believe me.
Rex
(65,616 posts)People are more likely to have a bootleg still in their back 40. A bootleg server...why not just call her a hacker?
longship
(40,416 posts)You have to get a permission note to participate.
NOT!
Everybody has permission. That's the best thing about the Internet and Net Neutrality.
All one does is buy symmetric bandwidth and a static IP and you are good to go. Put up all the servers and services you want. No worries.
Easy peasy!
Rex
(65,616 posts)Some have this notion that all servers are mainframes like you see in the movies (think Iron Man) and only NASA can build and implement them.
longship
(40,416 posts)All the supercomputers in the world use game console processors and standard microcomputer chips. Main frames are dead iron.
My favorite supercomputer handles the ALMA radio telescope (Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array):
?1347910873
It is at over 5,000 meters altitude in the Chilean Andes. The supercomputer that controls it is called the ALMA correlator with 134 million processors and is at the antenna site at 5,000 meters (about 16,500 feet) in the Andes. The air is so thin that they have special cooling to keep the computer from burning itself out.
I love technology and big science!
Rex
(65,616 posts)You think anyone uses FORTRAN anymore? God I am a fossil!
Rex
(65,616 posts)server...which nobody is saying.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)I think that's what it is. Their emails go to @theirlastname. They aren't plotting to take over the world. They work from home and do their banking and that sort of thing.
I don't really know what they mean by bootleg, but it's pretty clear some want to spin this to be as nefarious as possible, which is what I would expect from the GOP but it's beneath Democrats.
longship
(40,416 posts)And many here do not understand the concept of running and administrating an Internet server. So the "bootleg" description seems nefarious, when it isn't.
It ain't that difficult if one understands Internet protocols and the fact that one absolutely should not run Microsoft server software, let alone any other proprietary servers.
Then, it is pretty simple.
obnoxiousdrunk
(2,910 posts)Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Concern noted.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)nichomachus
(12,754 posts)Why are there 50 threads on DU saying that it's no big deal.
Sounds like it might just be a big deal.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I must of missed them. I did see some could hardly contain their glee that this story broke,
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)thinking of what the poutrage would be in DU had the Bush family been running it's own ISP out of Walker Point and running all Bush's government email through their own servers.
People here would have blood spurting from their ears.
The hypocrisy is incredible.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)BainsBane
(53,032 posts)Lots of people do. I could care less if the Bushes did.
I really don't think you're in a position to talk about hypocrisy when you make a point of excusing far more egregious actions by Putin. Would you be happier if Clinton had her rivals gunned down in from of the Capitol, or if she had Ken Starr poisoned with Polonium-210? Would that make her the kind of leader worth admiring--a real man?
Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)definitely not running a federal department that is at the nexus of every national security issue there is
and their business dealings are not by law the property of the federal government (and thus in turn public property).
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)email exclusively, according to State. The first. That is because the laws and protocol only recently, and after Clinton left office, went into effect. That means Rice, Powell, Albirght, and everyone else since the dawn of email used their private email for State business.
11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)It's Hillary, and she must be demonized!
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,834 posts)uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... under hat
IDWADDI
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)Fla Dem
(23,656 posts)server and made very sure it was secure. No doubt HRC also used it for that very reason. Seeing as there was no law/regulation in place while HRC was SoS that required her to use a government email service, this is just more bull pucky from the right.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)It's not illegal to do so.
It's probably more secure to have a private server with limited access, than it is to have your email routed through some commercial ISP. No risk of it being intercepted at the ISP that way.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)If not I think your post might be in the wrong thread
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... disingenuous if they do.
IF she were running ANY of her email through a commercial ISP that would be ANOTHER head line
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)realize that hosting your own servers at home doesn't really make you an 'ISP'. I ran my own webserver, database server, and mail server at home for years without ever being an 'ISP' - where the P stands for 'provider', as in you're doing things like hosting for OTHER people and charging them money for the 'Service'.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... a commercial ISP
spanone
(135,830 posts)uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... next thing we'll know Hillary also used a tooth brush...
FUD and haters will jump all over this story........................................... too....
sigh
People
"...physically running her own email ..."
Doesn't mean shit... this is another half truth article like the last one...
If you have a dedicated line to a server or service you're most likely going to have an IP address that doesn't change often or ever...
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)TerrapinFlyer
(277 posts)Hillary is not my first choice, but I might make her my first choice based on the idiocy here on DU.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)GusBob
(7,286 posts)I *really hope* to read about it several times a day for the next 9 years or so
signed,
GusBob*
* unofficial DU glutton for masochistic punishment
Number23
(24,544 posts)in the right place!!
GD has gotten so bad that people have actually started trashing this forum. I think of all of the political "scandals" that have caused this forum to get overexcited over the years, this is definitely one of the most lame.
It's not nearly as stupid as the "Obama admin was in the pockets of the banks and that's why bankers got the H1N1 vaccine before everyone else in NY" or as moronic as the "Obama's sicced the DHS on Occupy" but what it lacks in dumbness it more than makes for in lameness.
onenote
(42,700 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Other than an irrational bias, what specifically leads you call it 'bootleg'?
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Have a cigar!
It's not about having a reliable e-mail server. It's about circumventing oversight.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)azmom
(5,208 posts)Doing it for a while now. It's shameful.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)they will find out it was about running a non-government alternate email system...
It's a shame every time we find an R doing terrible shit, we can't act because it looks like something done by a D.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Why couldn't he simply have explained that he was sleep deprived?
That risible explanation worked for someone we know.
Some politicians and public figures are brought down by tiny scandals. Others survive gigantic ones. It's all a matter of news management and manufacturing consent.
Rex
(65,616 posts)So they (her IT team) built their own exchange server and ran it out of the house. That's what my current is going with.
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)A mail server operated out of Hillary's residence is not behind a State Department firewall, hence it is vulnerable to intrusion. It is irresponsible to conduct State Department communications from an unsecure mail server.
A secondary issue is that such communications would likely be missed if a legal records hold were imposed as the result of an inquiry or investigation.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Java
(82 posts)Classified Information is confined to SIPRNET and is to reside ONLY on classified systems hooked up to SIPRNET.
Unclassified Information is confined to an Unclassified Network of servers, however both the Network and the Servers have a lot of safeguards as mandated by IS policy and implemented using STIGs which are authored by the NSA.
All email traffic over unsecure networks that contain unclassified information yet is FOUO or PII is to be encrypted using approved asymmetric encryption algorithms with PKI keys.
Desktop and Laptop computers are supposed to be CAC enabled where the CAC card has a PKI certificate. Servers also have their own PKI certificates.
So...question...what are the IA security details concerning:
(a.) Hillary's personal network
(b.) Her Server
(c.) Encryption Algorithms used to secure email message contents
(d.) User Authentication
(e.) What are the backup (Archival) policies? How often are Server backups made? Are the backup copies stored in a separate facility in case of fire or other disaster in order to insure CONOPs?
With Government records....all of these things have to be done, including doing security IA audits of both the server and the network.
And again as mentioned in another thread...emails used for government purposes constitute government records including any and all data on servers used for Government business.
There is a "Policy Firewall" between using personally owned equipment and government equipment for government business.
People are to adhere to security and IA policies in order to safeguard information. It doesn't matter if they are Democrat, Republican or Martian. It is something that MUST be done at all times. Otherwise there is no security, IA vulnerabilities can't be assessed, nor can audits be done.
All hard drives in Hillary's personal possession as well as drives on any server (and any backup tapes) where Hillary conducted Government business needs to be seized. And the systems and networks used need to be assessed to see if the were any compromises by hackers.