Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nichomachus

(12,754 posts)
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 03:19 PM Mar 2015

The plot thickens. Hillary ran a bootleg ISP out of her house to handle her email.

https://www.yahoo.com/tech/s/clinton-ran-homebrew-computer-system-official-emails-081111269--politics.html

WASHINGTON (AP) — The computer server that transmitted and received Hillary Clinton's official emails when she was secretary of state traced back to an residential Internet service registered to her family's home in Chappaqua (CHAP'-uh-kwah), New York.

Internet records reviewed by The Associated Press disclosed the service registered to the Clinton home.

The practice of Clinton, a likely Democratic presidential candidate, physically running her own email as a Cabinet-level official is highly unusual.

She has not described her motivation for using a private email account or her own private email server. Most individuals who operate their own email servers are technical experts or users so concerned about issues of privacy and surveillance they take matters into their own hands.


Well that sounds really secure. But I thought the reason she didn't use the government service was because she is technically unsavvy and it was too hard.

71 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The plot thickens. Hillary ran a bootleg ISP out of her house to handle her email. (Original Post) nichomachus Mar 2015 OP
Didn't we already do this thread today? nt msanthrope Mar 2015 #1
Well, some of us have to wait until later in the day Android3.14 Mar 2015 #47
Yeah, you're right. It's "Hillary's turn." We should all just look the other way, right? n/t BP2 Mar 2015 #57
"Internet records reviewed by AP disclosed the service registered to the Clinton home." KamaAina Mar 2015 #2
Pretty much! leftofcool Mar 2015 #3
No, it's about State Department communications being sent from and stored Maedhros Mar 2015 #58
More yawn. trumad Mar 2015 #4
"Plot" "bootleg"? Well, isn't that special. aquart Mar 2015 #5
I used to run my website and email out of my home NightWatcher Mar 2015 #6
Pssst! The Secretary of State isn't a business owner. S/he's a public servant. RufusTFirefly Mar 2015 #7
That's the American Peoples business, not Hillary's business. Autumn Mar 2015 #13
Unfortunately, our minds, like so many of our public spaces and services, have been privatized RufusTFirefly Mar 2015 #15
I agree. The politicians certainly act like it's a business. A Chicken Ranch Business. Autumn Mar 2015 #18
I knew what the term meant, but I wasn't aware of its origin RufusTFirefly Mar 2015 #20
I was aware of what it was, but not MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #41
Well, I don't know why a no chicken; I'm a stranger here myself. RufusTFirefly Mar 2015 #56
Now I have to go watch that movie Scootaloo Mar 2015 #52
This sentence here is so apt when it comes to the way Congress seems to be doing business Autumn Mar 2015 #53
The "bootleg" description is odious. longship Mar 2015 #8
Official U.S. government communications are supposed to occur on government e-mail accounts RufusTFirefly Mar 2015 #11
I thought the term was "homebrewed" or something? Blue_Tires Mar 2015 #22
Well, I don't think Hillary administrated her own sendmail server. longship Mar 2015 #25
Nor was it an illegal server! The author of the piece should be ashamed of using that word. Rex Mar 2015 #63
Apparently some people think that the Internet is a whole owned commercial endeavor. longship Mar 2015 #64
True, with a self-help book even the layman can set up a server with DHCP. Rex Mar 2015 #66
Shit! Who needs mainframes these days. longship Mar 2015 #68
Ha true! Look at me dating myself! Rex Mar 2015 #69
Calling it 'bootleg' is total embelishment by the author. Unless she bought and ran an illegal Rex Mar 2015 #61
Both of my siblings have them BainsBane Mar 2015 #26
That is exactly why I posted my response. longship Mar 2015 #35
OMG this is HUGH !!! SERIES !!! obnoxiousdrunk Mar 2015 #9
Oh noes!! Bobbie Jo Mar 2015 #10
I am sorry but I just can't get worked up about this. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #12
If it's no big deal nichomachus Mar 2015 #14
There are 50 threads saying it is no big deal? hrmjustin Mar 2015 #16
I have to laugh nichomachus Mar 2015 #17
I agree. nt m-lekktor Mar 2015 #19
Well, my family members run them BainsBane Mar 2015 #28
your family is not running a federal department Man from Pickens Mar 2015 #33
Secretary Kerry is the first to use the state.gov BainsBane Mar 2015 #44
Oh you and your damn facts! C'mon, get with the program! 11 Bravo Mar 2015 #54
They ran their government email through the RNC servers. Gidney N Cloyd Mar 2015 #30
So you advocate the POTUS go through a commercial ISP?! ..mmmmmmmmmmmmmk... I"ll keep that uponit7771 Mar 2015 #37
yep frylock Mar 2015 #43
Swarming to protect the queen, is all. TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #45
I suspect that as her husband is a former US President, the Secret Service set up that Fla Dem Mar 2015 #21
Bootleg? I know a number of folks who run their own servers. Adrahil Mar 2015 #23
are they cabinet members or other federal public servants? Doctor_J Mar 2015 #29
People who are in IT see that other folk who aren't don't undersatnd the tech or are being very uponit7771 Mar 2015 #36
And people who are really tech savvy Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #55
RIGHT!! This is another stupid article ... they'd have another head line if she were going through.. uponit7771 Mar 2015 #34
i knew BENGHAZI was just the tip of the iceberg spanone Mar 2015 #24
WOW!!!!... Hillary Clinton had a static IP address associated with her ISP contract... WOW!!!!! uponit7771 Mar 2015 #27
Hi DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #31
Triple Yawn... TerrapinFlyer Mar 2015 #32
Speaking of idiocy -- your basis for choosing a candidate. SMC22307 Mar 2015 #38
I, for one, find this topic extremely important GusBob Mar 2015 #39
Well done, Gus! If you're a "glutton for masochistic punishment" you are DEFINITELY Number23 Mar 2015 #48
"Bootleg"? In what sense? onenote Mar 2015 #40
What specifically leads you call it 'bootleg'? LanternWaste Mar 2015 #42
Convenient way around FOIA. AtomicKitten Mar 2015 #46
Bingo! You're a winner! RufusTFirefly Mar 2015 #49
!!! AtomicKitten Mar 2015 #50
Yep, and apparently both parties have been azmom Mar 2015 #71
And when DU finally gets into the John Doe investigation of Scott Walker HereSince1628 Mar 2015 #51
Bingo! And don't get me started about O'Liely's fantasies about being in a war zone RufusTFirefly Mar 2015 #59
She was worried about the CIA spying on her as a former senator. Rex Mar 2015 #60
Maybe someone set it up for her nt LiberalElite Mar 2015 #62
The primary issue is security. Maedhros Mar 2015 #65
Hate to sound like a cynic, but I'll bet the secondary issue drove the decision. n/t RufusTFirefly Mar 2015 #70
Email and Servers Java Mar 2015 #67
 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
47. Well, some of us have to wait until later in the day
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 05:48 PM
Mar 2015

...to enjoy DU.

We don't have the luxury (or is it the job) of posting all day long.

Hope you understand.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
2. "Internet records reviewed by AP disclosed the service registered to the Clinton home."
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 03:26 PM
Mar 2015

What would that be? A whois search? So this is all about her not using GoDaddy to register a domain?

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
58. No, it's about State Department communications being sent from and stored
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 08:29 PM
Mar 2015

on an unsecure server.

I couldn't do that for my job - I'd be breaking a number of privacy laws and would be fired for negligence.

aquart

(69,014 posts)
5. "Plot" "bootleg"? Well, isn't that special.
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 03:37 PM
Mar 2015

Personally, I'm going to guess the security of a perpetually-guarded EX-PRESIDENT'S HOME is always going to be a bit more secure than yours or mine.

And we both know there's no way Hillary did that tech shit herself. I'm an experienced, educated user and I couldn't set that up.

This is going to be a long, annoying political season. Perhaps it's time to learn yoga. Or meditation.

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
6. I used to run my website and email out of my home
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 03:40 PM
Mar 2015

If I ever have a site again, I'll do it that way again. It's how you control your business.

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
7. Pssst! The Secretary of State isn't a business owner. S/he's a public servant.
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 03:49 PM
Mar 2015

We're talking about OUR democracy here, not someone's decidedly undemocratic, profit-oriented adventure.

Surely you understand the distinction.

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
15. Unfortunately, our minds, like so many of our public spaces and services, have been privatized
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 04:15 PM
Mar 2015

People no longer seem to appreciate the distinction between government and business.

Perhaps because there is none.

"Democracy has become a business plan, with a bottom line for every human activity, every dream, every decency, every hope." -- John Pilger

Autumn

(45,066 posts)
18. I agree. The politicians certainly act like it's a business. A Chicken Ranch Business.
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 04:26 PM
Mar 2015

Pardon the expression if you don't know what a Chicken Ranch is here is the info on the Texas Chicken Ranch.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_Ranch_%28Texas%29


 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
41. I was aware of what it was, but not
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 05:29 PM
Mar 2015

that it's an expression.

No, I am not taking questions at this time.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
52. Now I have to go watch that movie
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 06:55 PM
Mar 2015

'Cause all I'm gonna hear in my head until I do is Jim Nabors going "It's a Japanese slingshot!"

Autumn

(45,066 posts)
53. This sentence here is so apt when it comes to the way Congress seems to be doing business
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 07:00 PM
Mar 2015
prostitution was endemic in the local saloons, but no official records were kept



I still like the idea of them having to wear jackets with "sponsors" labels sewn on


"It's a Japanese slingshot!"

longship

(40,416 posts)
8. The "bootleg" description is odious.
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 03:52 PM
Mar 2015

Anybody can run their own server. There's nothing bootleg about it. When I lived in a SoCal I hosted my own domain name server, mail server, Web server, and even experimented with a VOIP server. All one needs is symmetric bandwidth and a static IP address. It all ran beautifully.

Nothing bootleg about it.

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
11. Official U.S. government communications are supposed to occur on government e-mail accounts
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 04:05 PM
Mar 2015

We're not talking about your home-based business here.

We're talking about the accountability of public servants.

Anyone who has worked with or for a public servant knows they go to great lengths to adhere rules for communication. For example, if you are running for office, you can not use your government e-mail account for campaign purposes. Similarly, if you are conducting the nation's business, you should not be using a private account for your communications.

Try putting the shoe on the other foot, and perhaps you will have a better appreciation for the gravity of the situation:

Emails link Scott Walker to secret email system

Madison — Thousands of documents unsealed Wednesday link Gov. Scott Walker to a secret email system used in his office that would avoid public scrutiny when he was Milwaukee County executive.
...
Walker used his campaign email to communicate with his county aides, who frequently used their own private email accounts when interacting with Walker or his campaign — all of which would shield their discussions from the public.

longship

(40,416 posts)
25. Well, I don't think Hillary administrated her own sendmail server.
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 04:53 PM
Mar 2015

Like I did. But it is not a difficult thing to do. I am sure Secy Clinton could easily have the resources to find somebody to put up a mail server and provide bandwidth to support it.

Plus, from what I have recently read right here on DU, the State Department has somewhat notorious unreliable e-mail infrastructure.

So, I do not blame her on this.

And BTW, it does not take much to secure an e-mail server. Believe me.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
63. Nor was it an illegal server! The author of the piece should be ashamed of using that word.
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 08:40 PM
Mar 2015

People are more likely to have a bootleg still in their back 40. A bootleg server...why not just call her a hacker?

longship

(40,416 posts)
64. Apparently some people think that the Internet is a whole owned commercial endeavor.
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 08:46 PM
Mar 2015

You have to get a permission note to participate.

NOT!

Everybody has permission. That's the best thing about the Internet and Net Neutrality.

All one does is buy symmetric bandwidth and a static IP and you are good to go. Put up all the servers and services you want. No worries.

Easy peasy!

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
66. True, with a self-help book even the layman can set up a server with DHCP.
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 08:49 PM
Mar 2015

Some have this notion that all servers are mainframes like you see in the movies (think Iron Man) and only NASA can build and implement them.

longship

(40,416 posts)
68. Shit! Who needs mainframes these days.
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 09:08 PM
Mar 2015

All the supercomputers in the world use game console processors and standard microcomputer chips. Main frames are dead iron.

My favorite supercomputer handles the ALMA radio telescope (Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array):
?1347910873

It is at over 5,000 meters altitude in the Chilean Andes. The supercomputer that controls it is called the ALMA correlator with 134 million processors and is at the antenna site at 5,000 meters (about 16,500 feet) in the Andes. The air is so thin that they have special cooling to keep the computer from burning itself out.


I love technology and big science!

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
69. Ha true! Look at me dating myself!
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 10:09 PM
Mar 2015

You think anyone uses FORTRAN anymore? God I am a fossil!

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
61. Calling it 'bootleg' is total embelishment by the author. Unless she bought and ran an illegal
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 08:39 PM
Mar 2015

server...which nobody is saying.

BainsBane

(53,032 posts)
26. Both of my siblings have them
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 04:55 PM
Mar 2015

I think that's what it is. Their emails go to @theirlastname. They aren't plotting to take over the world. They work from home and do their banking and that sort of thing.

I don't really know what they mean by bootleg, but it's pretty clear some want to spin this to be as nefarious as possible, which is what I would expect from the GOP but it's beneath Democrats.

longship

(40,416 posts)
35. That is exactly why I posted my response.
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 05:03 PM
Mar 2015

And many here do not understand the concept of running and administrating an Internet server. So the "bootleg" description seems nefarious, when it isn't.

It ain't that difficult if one understands Internet protocols and the fact that one absolutely should not run Microsoft server software, let alone any other proprietary servers.

Then, it is pretty simple.

nichomachus

(12,754 posts)
14. If it's no big deal
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 04:15 PM
Mar 2015

Why are there 50 threads on DU saying that it's no big deal.

Sounds like it might just be a big deal.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
16. There are 50 threads saying it is no big deal?
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 04:16 PM
Mar 2015

I must of missed them. I did see some could hardly contain their glee that this story broke,

nichomachus

(12,754 posts)
17. I have to laugh
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 04:17 PM
Mar 2015

thinking of what the poutrage would be in DU had the Bush family been running it's own ISP out of Walker Point and running all Bush's government email through their own servers.

People here would have blood spurting from their ears.

The hypocrisy is incredible.

BainsBane

(53,032 posts)
28. Well, my family members run them
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 04:57 PM
Mar 2015

Lots of people do. I could care less if the Bushes did.

I really don't think you're in a position to talk about hypocrisy when you make a point of excusing far more egregious actions by Putin. Would you be happier if Clinton had her rivals gunned down in from of the Capitol, or if she had Ken Starr poisoned with Polonium-210? Would that make her the kind of leader worth admiring--a real man?

 

Man from Pickens

(1,713 posts)
33. your family is not running a federal department
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 05:01 PM
Mar 2015

definitely not running a federal department that is at the nexus of every national security issue there is

and their business dealings are not by law the property of the federal government (and thus in turn public property).

BainsBane

(53,032 posts)
44. Secretary Kerry is the first to use the state.gov
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 05:39 PM
Mar 2015

email exclusively, according to State. The first. That is because the laws and protocol only recently, and after Clinton left office, went into effect. That means Rice, Powell, Albirght, and everyone else since the dawn of email used their private email for State business.

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
37. So you advocate the POTUS go through a commercial ISP?! ..mmmmmmmmmmmmmk... I"ll keep that
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 05:06 PM
Mar 2015

... under hat

Fla Dem

(23,656 posts)
21. I suspect that as her husband is a former US President, the Secret Service set up that
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 04:30 PM
Mar 2015

server and made very sure it was secure. No doubt HRC also used it for that very reason. Seeing as there was no law/regulation in place while HRC was SoS that required her to use a government email service, this is just more bull pucky from the right.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
23. Bootleg? I know a number of folks who run their own servers.
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 04:34 PM
Mar 2015

It's not illegal to do so.

It's probably more secure to have a private server with limited access, than it is to have your email routed through some commercial ISP. No risk of it being intercepted at the ISP that way.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
29. are they cabinet members or other federal public servants?
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 05:00 PM
Mar 2015

If not I think your post might be in the wrong thread

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
36. People who are in IT see that other folk who aren't don't undersatnd the tech or are being very
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 05:04 PM
Mar 2015

... disingenuous if they do.

IF she were running ANY of her email through a commercial ISP that would be ANOTHER head line

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
55. And people who are really tech savvy
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 07:12 PM
Mar 2015

realize that hosting your own servers at home doesn't really make you an 'ISP'. I ran my own webserver, database server, and mail server at home for years without ever being an 'ISP' - where the P stands for 'provider', as in you're doing things like hosting for OTHER people and charging them money for the 'Service'.

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
34. RIGHT!! This is another stupid article ... they'd have another head line if she were going through..
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 05:02 PM
Mar 2015

... a commercial ISP

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
27. WOW!!!!... Hillary Clinton had a static IP address associated with her ISP contract... WOW!!!!!
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 04:56 PM
Mar 2015

... next thing we'll know Hillary also used a tooth brush...

FUD and haters will jump all over this story........................................... too....

sigh

People

"...physically running her own email ..."

Doesn't mean shit... this is another half truth article like the last one...

If you have a dedicated line to a server or service you're most likely going to have an IP address that doesn't change often or ever...

 

TerrapinFlyer

(277 posts)
32. Triple Yawn...
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 05:01 PM
Mar 2015

Hillary is not my first choice, but I might make her my first choice based on the idiocy here on DU.

GusBob

(7,286 posts)
39. I, for one, find this topic extremely important
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 05:18 PM
Mar 2015

I *really hope* to read about it several times a day for the next 9 years or so

signed,

GusBob*

* unofficial DU glutton for masochistic punishment

Number23

(24,544 posts)
48. Well done, Gus! If you're a "glutton for masochistic punishment" you are DEFINITELY
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 05:50 PM
Mar 2015

in the right place!!

GD has gotten so bad that people have actually started trashing this forum. I think of all of the political "scandals" that have caused this forum to get overexcited over the years, this is definitely one of the most lame.

It's not nearly as stupid as the "Obama admin was in the pockets of the banks and that's why bankers got the H1N1 vaccine before everyone else in NY" or as moronic as the "Obama's sicced the DHS on Occupy" but what it lacks in dumbness it more than makes for in lameness.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
42. What specifically leads you call it 'bootleg'?
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 05:37 PM
Mar 2015

Other than an irrational bias, what specifically leads you call it 'bootleg'?

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
49. Bingo! You're a winner!
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 06:23 PM
Mar 2015

Have a cigar!



It's not about having a reliable e-mail server. It's about circumventing oversight.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
51. And when DU finally gets into the John Doe investigation of Scott Walker
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 06:55 PM
Mar 2015

they will find out it was about running a non-government alternate email system...


It's a shame every time we find an R doing terrible shit, we can't act because it looks like something done by a D.

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
59. Bingo! And don't get me started about O'Liely's fantasies about being in a war zone
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 08:30 PM
Mar 2015

Why couldn't he simply have explained that he was sleep deprived?
That risible explanation worked for someone we know.

Some politicians and public figures are brought down by tiny scandals. Others survive gigantic ones. It's all a matter of news management and manufacturing consent.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
60. She was worried about the CIA spying on her as a former senator.
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 08:34 PM
Mar 2015

So they (her IT team) built their own exchange server and ran it out of the house. That's what my current is going with.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
65. The primary issue is security.
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 08:49 PM
Mar 2015

A mail server operated out of Hillary's residence is not behind a State Department firewall, hence it is vulnerable to intrusion. It is irresponsible to conduct State Department communications from an unsecure mail server.

A secondary issue is that such communications would likely be missed if a legal records hold were imposed as the result of an inquiry or investigation.

Java

(82 posts)
67. Email and Servers
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 08:53 PM
Mar 2015

Classified Information is confined to SIPRNET and is to reside ONLY on classified systems hooked up to SIPRNET.

Unclassified Information is confined to an Unclassified Network of servers, however both the Network and the Servers have a lot of safeguards as mandated by IS policy and implemented using STIGs which are authored by the NSA.
All email traffic over unsecure networks that contain unclassified information yet is FOUO or PII is to be encrypted using approved asymmetric encryption algorithms with PKI keys.

Desktop and Laptop computers are supposed to be CAC enabled where the CAC card has a PKI certificate. Servers also have their own PKI certificates.

So...question...what are the IA security details concerning:
(a.) Hillary's personal network
(b.) Her Server
(c.) Encryption Algorithms used to secure email message contents
(d.) User Authentication
(e.) What are the backup (Archival) policies? How often are Server backups made? Are the backup copies stored in a separate facility in case of fire or other disaster in order to insure CONOPs?

With Government records....all of these things have to be done, including doing security IA audits of both the server and the network.

And again as mentioned in another thread...emails used for government purposes constitute government records including any and all data on servers used for Government business.

There is a "Policy Firewall" between using personally owned equipment and government equipment for government business.

People are to adhere to security and IA policies in order to safeguard information. It doesn't matter if they are Democrat, Republican or Martian. It is something that MUST be done at all times. Otherwise there is no security, IA vulnerabilities can't be assessed, nor can audits be done.

All hard drives in Hillary's personal possession as well as drives on any server (and any backup tapes) where Hillary conducted Government business needs to be seized. And the systems and networks used need to be assessed to see if the were any compromises by hackers.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The plot thickens. Hillar...