General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIsrael lost me a long tine ago when they supported South African apartheid.
United States, Israel opposed Mandela, supported Apartheid
http://www.juancole.com/2013/12/mandela-supported-apartheid.html
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Whoops! That was a secret! Guess I let the cat out of the bag!
Chakab
(1,727 posts)right to Israeli citizenship didn't spread.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)oh wait its not about race its about....birth control..... yes it is..........
that story doesn't get played much but its true.
I find all the followers of the tribe or god of Abraham..be you Christians , Islam or jewish
you picked a vindictive godl
atreides1
(16,079 posts)It's his followers who are!
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)Last edited Fri Mar 6, 2015, 07:28 PM - Edit history (1)
But you will HAVE no gods before me
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)that is one of the things that made me an atheist
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Thousands of Ethiopian women are said to be receiving shots of Depo-Provera every three months in Israeli clinics. The contraceptive stops menstruation and has been linked to fertility problems and osteoporosis.
Yaakov Litzman, Israel's deputy minister of health, who has previously denied the practice, will lead the inquiry, a spokesperson announced on Wednesday.
The phenomenon was uncovered when social workers noticed the birth rate among Ethiopian immigrants halving in a decade. An Israeli documentary investigating the scandal was aired in December and prompted a popular outcry.
It revealed that women were started on a course of contraceptive jabs while still in transit camps in Ethiopia, some without being told they were being given birth control and many having no idea of the side-effects. When they eventually arrived in Israel, doctors continued the treatment unquestioningly. But the critical question remains unanswered as to who instigated the policy, with neither Israel nor Ethiopia willing to claim responsibility.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/feb/28/ethiopian-women-given-contraceptives-israel
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)The phenomenon was uncovered ......I love phenomenons.
Its almost out the bible
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)It has the same goal and effect.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)as if you stop the depo the effects also stop I'm not supporting this but when discussing Israel it is important to be accurate
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)When critiquing Israel, it is important to be accurate.
Experience has shown that any amount of bullshit all day long is perfectly fine so long as it's pro-Israel bullshit.
Such as one of our more... prolific I/P posters who argued that coercive depo was needed to "preserve Israel's Jewish Character" (seeing as the people are Jewish, the poster obviously meant "white"
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)The regime of apartheid in South Africa, under which nonwhites were systematically oppressed and deprived of their rights, is remembered as one of the worst crimes against humanity of the 20th century.
Despite a growing international movement to topple apartheid in the 1980s, President Ronald Reagan maintained a close alliance with a South African government that was showing no signs of serious reform. And the Reagan administration demonized opponents of apartheid, most notably the African National Congress, as dangerous and pro-communist. Reagan even vetoed a bill to impose sanctions on South Africa, only to be overruled by Congress.
On a trip to the United States after winning the Nobel Prize in 1984, Bishop Desmond Tutu memorably declared that Reagans policy was immoral, evil and totally un-Christian. Reagans record on South Africa was also marked by at least one embarrassing gaffe, when he told a radio interviewer in 1985: They have eliminated the segregation that we once had in our own country the type of thing where hotels and restaurants and places of entertainment and so forth were segregated that has all been eliminated. Of course, that was simply not true, and Reagan later walked the statement back.
Carter had imposed sanctions and restrictions on South Africa and also had publicly criticized the South African government many times. Reagan went back to supporting the government, and he did it under the guise of the policy of constructive engagement. This policy had been worked out by Chester Crocker, later a Reagan State Department official, who wrote about it in Foreign Affairs in 1980.
malaise
(268,997 posts)Last edited Fri Mar 6, 2015, 08:23 PM - Edit history (1)
they introduced their own version in both the West Bank and Gaza.
Now the African Jews can't be Jews,,and you know why.
Funny how the victim becomes the shadow of his oppressor.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)and didn't his admin consider Mandela a "terrorist"?
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)That what did it for me.
atreides1
(16,079 posts)After I saw Israeli security personnel treat an elderly Palestinian gentlemen as if he were less then human.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Nixon started a policy with Kissinger of supporting the apartheid regime, Reagan carried it out fully even as the American public and the Congress grew more aware and more opposed to the regime and apartheid. Democrats first tried to pass the Anti-Apartheid Act in 1985, it was opposed by Reagan and filibustered by Republicans. A second attempt to pass a version with slightly less harsh sanctions passed the House and Senate in 1986 over Reagan's public objections. Ronald Reagan then vetoed the Anti-Apartheid Act at the urgings of such advisers as Pat Buchanan. The veto was overridden in the Congress and sanctions were imposed.
So it is very interesting to me that people seem to have forgotten what it meant to be a Reagan Republican. There is much current revision going on, claims that Republicans were super moderate back then.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)until the Sabra/Shatila massacres. That was my deal-breaker.
Rex
(65,616 posts)I take it the Israeli leader at the time was good buddies with Apartheid lover Reagan?
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)There is just too much of it for even 10 lifetimes to digest. Maybe even 100 or a 1000.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)It's a mystery to me, the game commences
For the usual fee, plus expenses
Confidential information, it's a diary
This is my investigation, it's not a public inquiry
I go checking out the reports, digging up the dirt
You get to meet all sorts in this line of work
Treachery and treason, there's always an excuse for it
And when I find the reason I still can't get used to
Rex
(65,616 posts)Along with the Eagles, in my top 10!
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Great Britain either. Boycotting all things British? Interesting watching the selective memory machine here and the abject hypocrisy that is bound to show itself.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)Israel supported south African apartheid..............and that's a historical fact.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)to Kjell Laugerud's regime (he's Norwegian, don't ask), so they immediately turned to Israel
Ríos Montt's tactic of "shoot some natives at random so the rest flee into garrison villages" and "use native forces against natives" was directly imported from Israel's tactics in South Lebanon
Ariel Sharon (fresh from Sabra and Shatila) was also the first to set up the money-laundering and arms-smuggling networks in Central America in 1982: Ollie North just "plugged in" to existing Argentine, Chilean, and Israeli networks later in the decade after the Boland Amendments--back before he ordered a literal metric shit-ton of cocaine in one go and gave us Red Ribbon week (kids, don't buy anything from the windowless van behind the elementary school!)
Response to Ichingcarpenter (Original post)
Post removed
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)Shooting your allies to blind them in the interest of operational security is a deadly form of selfishness
Solindsey
(115 posts)Just saying. <<.>>
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Blind Faith.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)F---ing WoW.
DocMac
(1,628 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Mosby
(16,310 posts)Claiming that Jews think they are superior is bigotry.
We call it Antisemitism.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I also don't get the nexus between Israel and Matthew 10.
Mosby
(16,310 posts)I have no clue what matt 10 is about.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Codeine
(25,586 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Joe Johns
(91 posts)And now they're pretty much emulating it.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)I suppose it's not a stretch to see these things are interconnected.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)Matthew 10
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I don't see the nexus between it and the modern state of Israel.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Please interpret the message in Matthew 10 for me.
Thank you in advance.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)there is nothing I can interpret for you. Everybody must find their own path. Good Luck.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)-Luke 15 7
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)Im just a poor fruit inspector.!
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Romans 1:16
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)I didn't even give him a "God's Speed" as I turned him a way out of my Life.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)I have the utmost respect for people of faith, but true religious tolerance cannot exist in a state in which the government openly embraces a specific belief.
tritsofme
(17,377 posts)Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)That said, religious affiliation in the nations you mention is generally limited to figurehead royalty. Elizabeth II may be the "Defender of the Faith", but it has no bearing on the daily operations of Parliament. OTOH, every government in the Middle East is wedded to a faith. I say to Hell with all of them.
no_hypocrisy
(46,104 posts)by selling weapons to that country. They didn't want to interrupt the sales.