Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

malaise

(268,993 posts)
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 10:46 PM Mar 2015

Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah! Supreme Court to Chris Christie: You are not emperor

http://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf/2015/03/supreme_court_to_chris_christie_you_are_not_empero.html
<snip>
Make no mistake: Gov. Chris Christie suffered a major defeat this week at the hands of the state Supreme Court. It was one of the greatest affirmations of the integrity of our judiciary in a long time.

The Christie administration was, in essence, telling our state's highest court not to hold by its own orders on affordable housing. The message of the justices was clear: No way.

They drew a red line in the face of our imperial governor, reiterating that towns can't use their zoning laws to keep out working class people. Most notably, the decision was unanimous. All three of Christie's appointees ruled against him, putting the law before politics.

The response from the governor's office was unusually muted. After all, what is Christie going to say now — that his own people are activist judges? That this is yet another edict from a "liberal court"?
52 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah! Supreme Court to Chris Christie: You are not emperor (Original Post) malaise Mar 2015 OP
Ha! Good thing he's not an emperor.... MADem Mar 2015 #1
The day is coming when this one will be naked malaise Mar 2015 #2
That was a visual I did not need. Thank you very much. Lochloosa Mar 2015 #11
Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww indeed malaise Mar 2015 #25
Yeah I was thinking this when a nekkid Emperor Christie was mentioned... 47of74 Mar 2015 #30
Rare that any con in any place of authority does the right thing, that it was done here NoJusticeNoPeace Mar 2015 #51
Did you HAVE to put that image in my head? AngryDem001 Mar 2015 #16
Here you go. 47of74 Mar 2015 #20
LOL and thanks malaise Mar 2015 #23
Response was "Unusually Muted" misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #3
He was trying to zone communities to keep out the working class malaise Mar 2015 #8
There must a karmic return for all those he has bullied & all misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #17
+1,000 malaise Mar 2015 #21
What? Was this somebody else telling HIM to "sit down and shut up"? calimary Mar 2015 #45
good connection. riversedge Mar 2015 #48
Great, and the 8bln dollar scandal will haunt him too! n/t sadoldgirl Mar 2015 #4
That one will more than haunt him malaise Mar 2015 #7
Who will sue him? sadoldgirl Mar 2015 #13
The NJ legislature is having hearings on this which will set the stage malaise Mar 2015 #24
Love it!... chillfactor Mar 2015 #5
Whoa!!! Stellar Mar 2015 #6
He lost epically! sheshe2 Mar 2015 #9
And then some malaise Mar 2015 #10
Sigh~ sheshe2 Mar 2015 #14
My Republican relatives Thespian2 Mar 2015 #12
Christie also has little support among Republicans elsewhere. razorman Mar 2015 #49
Glad someone stopped him. mountain grammy Mar 2015 #15
Right, but this could have been much sadoldgirl Mar 2015 #18
THIS is why judges should be appointed rather than elected. EEO Mar 2015 #19
Very well said malaise Mar 2015 #22
Then again, judges who serve for life can be as intellectually dishonest and unabashedly partisan merrily Mar 2015 #27
When there is accountability and the judiciary is checked by the other branches it works. EEO Mar 2015 #31
Here in Iowa judges are appointed, not elected. 47of74 Mar 2015 #32
Christie's exampting himself from prohibitions against accepting gifts and favors was bold, to put merrily Mar 2015 #26
Without Getting Too Much Into Policy.... Laxman Mar 2015 #28
Thanks for your input Laxman malaise Mar 2015 #29
By the way, do you realize you're only nine entries away rocktivity Mar 2015 #44
please, get into the policy, because if they're trying it in NJ, they're trying it elsewhere. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #47
I'm surprised he didn't complain about activist judges NewJeffCT Mar 2015 #33
The problem is that he appointed them malaise Mar 2015 #34
Shame and hypocrisy NewJeffCT Mar 2015 #35
True - their only interest is money malaise Mar 2015 #36
Heh. Poor guy, can't catch a break these days... CTyankee Mar 2015 #37
Now, he sinking like a stone in a swamp of his own making. malaise Mar 2015 #39
You are so nice, Malaise... CTyankee Mar 2015 #50
I love your art threads malaise Mar 2015 #52
I hate zonning The Jungle 1 Mar 2015 #38
And then they scream about privacy and freedom malaise Mar 2015 #40
This is wonderful. Enthusiast Mar 2015 #41
A glutton for power, acglutton for privilege, a glutton for wealth malaise Mar 2015 #42
The last Crew Christie member who called a judge a liberal activist rocktivity Mar 2015 #43
Morons and bullies malaise Mar 2015 #46

MADem

(135,425 posts)
1. Ha! Good thing he's not an emperor....
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 10:49 PM
Mar 2015

Those emperors sometimes patronize dodgy tailors...!

Serves him right!

malaise

(268,993 posts)
2. The day is coming when this one will be naked
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 10:51 PM
Mar 2015

but I'll need more than bleach to think about that moment

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
51. Rare that any con in any place of authority does the right thing, that it was done here
Mon Mar 16, 2015, 07:32 PM
Mar 2015

must mean Christie was way out of line.

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
17. There must a karmic return for all those he has bullied & all
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 11:47 PM
Mar 2015

..he has injured and for how far reaching his harm and for all who he manipulated & threatened in service to him.
Here's to karma hanging it all back.. & heavily on his very own shoulders to wear.

malaise

(268,993 posts)
21. +1,000
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 06:19 AM
Mar 2015

I am convinced that the massive bully and his corrupt goons think they're living the Sopranos.
If M$Greedia paid attention this would have been a huge story. This is gentrification on steroids.

calimary

(81,261 posts)
45. What? Was this somebody else telling HIM to "sit down and shut up"?
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 08:22 PM
Mar 2015

Why, how dare they!

Couldn't happen to a nicer fella...

malaise

(268,993 posts)
7. That one will more than haunt him
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 11:00 PM
Mar 2015

They gave him money for the ReTHUG governors set up and this will end up in court with serious consequences.

malaise

(268,993 posts)
24. The NJ legislature is having hearings on this which will set the stage
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 06:40 AM
Mar 2015

for the courts. No way they're taking this one - and it could be big trouble for Christie.

Check out the implications for the lower income housing ruling
http://www.njherald.com/story/28498714/latest-nj-affordable-housing-ruling-could-spark-action

chillfactor

(7,575 posts)
5. Love it!...
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 10:55 PM
Mar 2015

so Christie go this face and his butt slapped at the same time by his own appointees....i bet he thought he had this one in the bag

sheshe2

(83,757 posts)
9. He lost epically!
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 11:13 PM
Mar 2015
Yes, he's washed his hands of it — true. But by no means could Christie have predicted his own appointees would also rule against him. He picked an epic constitutional fight, and lost. Epically.


Aaaaah~ Christie will have a sad here.

Thespian2

(2,741 posts)
12. My Republican relatives
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 11:26 PM
Mar 2015

living in New Jersey do not like Christie's attempt to destroy the state. They did not vote for him and do not like him. Perhaps some hope exists for NJ.

razorman

(1,644 posts)
49. Christie also has little support among Republicans elsewhere.
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 10:50 PM
Mar 2015

Many Repubs and conservatives I have talked to despise him. If he still has dreams of running for president, he needs to put them away. There is virtually no chance of him winning the Republican nomination. Most of them see him as a pal of President Obama.
Boehner, McConnel, and McCain are also on their shit list.

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
18. Right, but this could have been much
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 11:50 PM
Mar 2015

better, if he had been the nominee already. Now he is
just out of the running.

EEO

(1,620 posts)
19. THIS is why judges should be appointed rather than elected.
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 12:57 AM
Mar 2015

Elected judges trivializes the interpretation of law, because they want to be re-elected.

An appointed judge - if ethical - can give intellectually honest rulings without fear of losing his seat.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
27. Then again, judges who serve for life can be as intellectually dishonest and unabashedly partisan
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 09:25 AM
Mar 2015

as they feel like being and nothing is likely to be done about it. Just ask Scalia, Thomas, et al.

Those who demanded and ratified the Bill of Rights in 1789 intended it to apply to corporations? Really?

And that's only one example. Scalia, for instance, has publicly stated that he doesn't even read anything but RW newspapers anymore.

 

47of74

(18,470 posts)
32. Here in Iowa judges are appointed, not elected.
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 02:32 PM
Mar 2015

However, judges are subject to retention votes after 10 years.

Here in Iowa that reich winger Vander Platts orchestrated having three of the Supreme Court judges that let teh gays get married ousted in 2010 after their turn came up for retention votes. He tried to do the same again in 2012 but that time the voters decided to retain the remaining judges who voted for marriage equality. I suppose he could try again in 2020 or 2022 but hopefully he'll get smacked down again by the voters.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
26. Christie's exampting himself from prohibitions against accepting gifts and favors was bold, to put
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 09:22 AM
Mar 2015

it nicely.

Laxman

(2,419 posts)
28. Without Getting Too Much Into Policy....
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 10:05 AM
Mar 2015

before I even finish a cup of coffee on a Sunday morning, I believe this Supreme Court decision was exactly what Christie was after. He and his administration purposely caused it. They were deliberately failing to move forward with new acceptable affordable housing rules and policies in an attempt to get to this very point. The constitutional obligation (that's NJ's constitution) still exists with no mechanism to implement it. Now there is something of a free-for-all where Christie's supporters in the building industry (who were his prime supporters in getting him into office in the first place) now have an opening to operate in a manner that will free them of local zoning and planning restrictions. Now they have the opportunity to enlist the Courts-or the threat of litigation- to strong arm municipalities. The results will not be beneficial. Kevin Walsh did gain a victory here by exposing the dilatory tactics of the Christie administration when it comes to affordable housing policy, however it is just another step in Christie's ultimate goal to eliminate planning and regulation from land use policy in a state that desperately needs it. It's a great headline, but not exactly what it appears to be. There is quite a ways to go before this issue is played out, but it isn't exactly what the Star-Ledger has portrayed. This isn't a good thing for NJ for any number of reasons that are way too complex to go into here. This issue may have a happier ending, dependent upon what the next developments are, but based on recent history I'm not too optimistic.

rocktivity

(44,576 posts)
44. By the way, do you realize you're only nine entries away
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 08:03 PM
Mar 2015

from Christie Crime Digest Volume Three? I was going to tell you not to procrastinate about putting it up when the time came, but I can do that later...


rocktivity

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
47. please, get into the policy, because if they're trying it in NJ, they're trying it elsewhere.
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 08:30 PM
Mar 2015

Forewarned is forearmed.

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
33. I'm surprised he didn't complain about activist judges
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 03:59 PM
Mar 2015

Heck, when Antonin Scalia rejected Tom DeLay, it didn't stop DeLay from complaining about Scalia being an activist judge.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
37. Heh. Poor guy, can't catch a break these days...
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 04:18 PM
Mar 2015

I bet he wishes for those old glory days when he was the GOP bright hope. Now, he sinking like a stone in a swamp of his own making.

Makes you glad there is such a thing as karma...

malaise

(268,993 posts)
39. Now, he sinking like a stone in a swamp of his own making.
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 05:13 PM
Mar 2015

Beautifully stated - like Friday evening artwork

 

The Jungle 1

(4,552 posts)
38. I hate zonning
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 04:50 PM
Mar 2015

Zoning is the ultimate rich man's scam to control the middle class. Republicans love zenning. My community and county in south eastern Pa are completely republican run. They control everything I do on my property. I can't dig a hole, cut down my trees, change my heating system or put on a new roof unless I ask permission from my local government. Funny thing is that most of my state has no zoning and everything runs just fine.
Zoning is completly out of control in my area.

When I point out that zoning is clearly socialism the republicans get real quiet. I thought republicans hated socialism?

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
41. This is wonderful.
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 06:10 PM
Mar 2015

Christie could get a good role as an actor. He could play a Roman emperor, a real degenerate, an especially gluttonous one. Take your pick.

malaise

(268,993 posts)
42. A glutton for power, acglutton for privilege, a glutton for wealth
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 06:30 PM
Mar 2015

and food - the quintessential 'fat cat'.
Sadly next will be glutton for punishment

rocktivity

(44,576 posts)
43. The last Crew Christie member who called a judge a liberal activist
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 07:56 PM
Mar 2015

had to be supplied with a new job because the judge was appointed by Christine Whitman.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025933523#post104


rocktivity

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa...