Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

niyad

(113,289 posts)
Wed Mar 18, 2015, 09:37 PM Mar 2015

Why Are University Presidents Leaving Campus Rape Survivors Out in the Cold?

(trigger warning):

(anger warning):




Why Are University Presidents Leaving Campus Rape Survivors Out in the Cold?



College administrators have known about the campus rape problem for three decades, and they have been mandated to address it for two decades. So why has so little been done? One major factor among many is failed leadership at the top of the academy.
Karen Barrett first documented the campus rape problem in her 1982 article “Date Rape: A Campus Epidemic?” in Ms. magazine, and Ms. published another article on the same topic in 1985 featuring Dr. Mary Koss’ three-year study of over 7,000 students at 35 schools. Koss found that 1 in 4 college women faced rape or attempted rape during their time on campus—and not much has changed since then.

Schools have been mandated by law to address campus sexual assault for the past 20 years. The Clery Act of 1990 requires schools to accurately report their rape numbers, but campuses routinely underreport these figures. Schools were first mandated to provide support and accommodations to survivors in 1992 with the passage of the Sexual Assault Victims’ Bill of Rights, but most schools still fall short. As a graduate student in the late 1990s in a leadership position in residence life, I can attest to the fact that campus administrators at national conferences I attended were well aware of the campus rape problem.

So why has so little been done by college administrators?

A recent survey of college and university presidents from Inside Higher Ed reveals that presidents are a key part of the problem. Of all institutional players, college presidents have the most power to make change—through hiring decisions, policies and day-to-day leadership. Despite reputable studies showing that 1 in 5 female students face sexual assault, only 1 in 3 college presidents agree with the statement, “sexual assault is prevalent on college campuses,” according to the new report. Furthermore, only 6 percent of college presidents agree that sexual assault is prevalent on their campuses, when plenty of evidence otherwise exists.

Seventy-seven percent say their schools are doing a “good job” addressing the problem, while only 4 percent were willing to admit that their school does not adequately protect students. The truth is that almost no schools expel rapists or take other basic measures to prevent assaults on their campuses due to institutional fears about being sued by perpetrators or losing alumni donations if a problem is exposed.

. . . .

http://msmagazine.com/blog/2015/03/18/why-are-university-presidents-leaving-campus-rape-survivors-out-in-the-cold/

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Are University Presidents Leaving Campus Rape Survivors Out in the Cold? (Original Post) niyad Mar 2015 OP
You should read this thread about rape reporting.......and who is against msanthrope Mar 2015 #1
okay, I am clearly missing something, because I see nothing about rape in the linked niyad Mar 2015 #2
Read the thread. I noted what the OP missed....and what pissed off George Will.... msanthrope Mar 2015 #3
Very simple sarisataka Mar 2015 #4
It's all about the money, as I outlined above. I think the Obama administration msanthrope Mar 2015 #5
Interesting to contrast this against high schools, Trillo Mar 2015 #6
Because they don't want their institutions to look bad. Are_grits_groceries Mar 2015 #7
. . . niyad Mar 2015 #8
 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
1. You should read this thread about rape reporting.......and who is against
Wed Mar 18, 2015, 10:05 PM
Mar 2015

tying it to funding Pell Grants......

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025004676

It might answer why University/College presidents have been getting away with this.

For further edification

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5113403

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
3. Read the thread. I noted what the OP missed....and what pissed off George Will....
Wed Mar 18, 2015, 10:13 PM
Mar 2015

that under the Obama administration, sexual assault reporting would be linked to Pell Grant availability.

This apparently was a problem.

Seriously. ..read the thread.

Apparently. ..the Diane Ravitch wing of the Democratic Party has a problem with tying rape reporting to funding. Because, Obama. And Arne Duncan.

Why do University Presidents leave rape victims out in the cold? Because they can. Apparently with pseudo-democratic support.

sarisataka

(18,633 posts)
4. Very simple
Wed Mar 18, 2015, 10:24 PM
Mar 2015

A rape survivor is not likely to have fond feelings for her Alma Mater or be a generous alumna.

An unpunished rapist or someone who believes the school has the matter in hand and that the administration is taking care of the problem (if there even is a problem) will feel differently ...

#
 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
5. It's all about the money, as I outlined above. I think the Obama administration
Wed Mar 18, 2015, 10:34 PM
Mar 2015

was brilliant to tie sexual assault and other crimes to funding. Few alum donations will cover that deficit and public shame.

Trillo

(9,154 posts)
6. Interesting to contrast this against high schools,
Thu Mar 19, 2015, 07:07 AM
Mar 2015

where if you as a less than 18-year old fall in love and have consensual sex with someone else and are discovered, you get expelled. Oh, right, the legislators have determined that two minors can't give consent to each other, even though puberty begins as young as 10.

But, if you're over 18 and in college, and you rape someone, that means consent doesn't exist, heads are turned as if nothing happened at all.

Our system is designed to punish young people in any way it can.

Are_grits_groceries

(17,111 posts)
7. Because they don't want their institutions to look bad.
Thu Mar 19, 2015, 07:12 AM
Mar 2015

That will affect enrollment.
It will also affect the money given by alumni and others.
There are other reasons, but those are two of the main ones.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Are University Presid...