HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Amy Goodman: Flush the T...

Fri Mar 20, 2015, 05:55 PM

Amy Goodman: Flush the TPP (TPP was started under GW)

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/flush_the_tpp_20150320

Posted on Mar 20, 2015

By Amy Goodman

President Barack Obama and the Republicans in Congress are united. Yes, that’s right. No, not on Obamacare, or on the budget, or on negotiations with Iran, or on equal pay for women. But on so-called free-trade agreements, which increase corporate power and reduce the power of people to govern themselves democratically, Obama and the Republicans stand shoulder to shoulder. This has put the president at loggerheads with his strongest congressional allies, the progressive Democrats, who oppose the TPP, or the Trans-Pacific Partnership, one of the most far-reaching trade agreements in history. TPP will set rules governing more than 40 percent of the world’s economy. Obama has been negotiating in secret, and the Democrats are not happy.

The battle lines are being drawn over the TPP and TPA. If you are confused, well, that is exactly what many of the most powerful corporations in the U.S., and around the world, are counting on. Trade policy is arcane, complex and long the domain of economists and technocrats. But the real-world implications of these dry texts are profound. President Obama wants to pass the TPP, which is a broad trade agreement between the U.S. and 11 other countries in the Pacific Rim: Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam. In order to expedite the process, President Obama is seeking the second acronym, TPA, or Trade Promotion Authority, also called “fast-track.” Fast-track gives the president authority to negotiate a trade deal, and to then present it to Congress for a yes-or-no vote, with no amendments allowed. A growing coalition is organizing to oppose TPP and the president’s request for fast-track. The outcome of this conflict will reverberate globally for generations to come.

The TPP negotiations have been held in secret. Most people know what little they do because WikiLeaks, the document disclosure and whistle-blower website, released several chapters more than a year ago. Members of Congress also have been given limited access to briefings on the negotiations, but under strict secrecy rules that, in at least one instance recently, include the threat of imprisonment if details leak.

The TPP would be an expanded version of earlier trade agreements, like NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement, involving the U.S., Canada and Mexico. NAFTA went into effect on Jan. 1, 1994, and was so harmful to the culture and economy of the indigenous people of Chiapas, Mexico, that they rebelled on that very day, in what is known as the Zapatista Uprising. Attempts to create a global trade deal, under the auspices of the World Trade Organization, provoked one of the largest protests against corporate power in history, in Seattle in late 1999. Thousands of protesters locked arms and literally blocked delegates from getting to the ministerial meeting. As unexpected solidarity between union members and environmentalists flourished in the streets, despite widespread police violence, the WTO talks collapsed in total failure.

The TPP, if passed, would implement trade rules that make it illegal for governments to create and enforce regulations on everything from environmental standards, to wage and labor laws, to the duration of copyrights. A law prohibiting the sale of goods made in sweatshops in Vietnam could be ruled illegal, for example, as a barrier to trade. Or certification requirements that lumber not be harvested from old-growth forests in Malaysia could be overturned.

Lori Wallach of Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch program is one of the leading critics of TPP:

“It’s a delivery mechanism for a lot of the things [Senate Majority Leader Mitch] McConnell and the Republicans like. So, for instance, it would increase the duration of patents for Big Pharma and, as a result, give them windfall profits but increase our medicine prices. It could roll back financial regulation on big banks. It could limit Internet freedom, sort of sneak through the back door the Stop Online Piracy Act, SOPA,” Wallach explained. “It would give special privileges and rights for foreign corporations to skirt around our courts and sue the U.S. government to raid our treasury over any environmental, consumer health law that they think undermine their expected future profits, the so-called ‘investor-state’ enforcement system. Plus, it would have the NAFTA-style rules that make it easier to offshore jobs, making it easier to relocate to low-wage countries.”

The TPP, she went on, “was negotiated with the assistance of 600 corporate advisers, official corporate trade advisers in the U.S. The agreement has been the initiative of the Obama administration. It was started by [President George W.] Bush, but instead of turning it around and making it something different, the Obama folks picked it up and, frankly, have made it even more extreme.”

Grass-roots activists are organizing against the TPP and fast-track. They work on diverse issues ranging from human rights and Internet freedom to fair trade, labor rights and the environment. The moneyed interests in Washington have the ear of the president, so they need only whisper. Now people must raise their voices, in unison, and demand to be heard.

-----------

It's interesting that this was started under GW, yet somehow some still believe we are not under corporate rule.

12 replies, 1625 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 12 replies Author Time Post
Reply Amy Goodman: Flush the TPP (TPP was started under GW) (Original post)
mother earth Mar 2015 OP
WorseBeforeBetter Mar 2015 #1
GoneFishin Mar 2015 #2
midnight Mar 2015 #3
KG Mar 2015 #4
Warren DeMontague Mar 2015 #5
Doctor_J Mar 2015 #7
Doctor_J Mar 2015 #6
Wella Mar 2015 #8
Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #9
G_j Mar 2015 #10
countryjake Mar 2015 #11
KoKo May 2015 #12

Response to mother earth (Original post)

Fri Mar 20, 2015, 08:16 PM

1. K&R

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mother earth (Original post)

Fri Mar 20, 2015, 08:37 PM

2. No mealy mouthed fixes are tolerable. Shitcan this piece of crap. The motive behind

it is pure greed. If they get this dungheap through then the country's downward spiral will go into overdrive.

President Obama, what are thinking? What are you trying to do to the country?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mother earth (Original post)

Fri Mar 20, 2015, 08:48 PM

3. Flush that along with right to work, race to the top, and huge student loan debt.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mother earth (Original post)

Fri Mar 20, 2015, 08:50 PM

4. she never loved him anyway!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mother earth (Original post)

Fri Mar 20, 2015, 08:52 PM

5. Although some would have us bow down to the almighty TPP

It is but olio

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #5)

Fri Mar 20, 2015, 09:17 PM

7. are you threatening me?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mother earth (Original post)

Fri Mar 20, 2015, 09:16 PM

6. since Bush started it, that gives Obama an out.

 

Unfortunately he's never seen a corporate giveaway he didn't love. I'll hold out a sliver of hope until it's signed. My official prediction is that some tiny, insignificant change will be made (transnationals can ignore local governments, but not actually overthrow them), and the BOG will claim that this makes TPP totally different and therefore acceptable.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mother earth (Original post)

Fri Mar 20, 2015, 10:16 PM

8. Thank you for posting this!

 

Kick and recommend.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mother earth (Original post)

Fri Mar 20, 2015, 10:20 PM

9. It is never the 50-50 split they promise


Flush it is right!

K&R!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mother earth (Original post)

Fri Mar 20, 2015, 10:24 PM

10. right on Amy!

well done.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mother earth (Original post)

Sat Mar 21, 2015, 09:40 PM

11. K&R!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mother earth (Original post)

Fri May 15, 2015, 10:35 AM

12. K&R!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread