A question re:9/11 (not a truther honest question)

[ruffburr]

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by uppityperson (a host of the General Discussion forum).

OK over the last few years I've read /watched everything that has to do with 9/11, I still end up with one nagging question which is the original P.N.A.C. document by the heritage foundation ie: Bush boys et.al. regarding the coincidence of this document being written several years earlier than 9/11 among other coincidentally questionable phrases is,The main way to obtain the consent of the people it would take a Dec.7th type of attack then low and behold 9/11, I am not a truther but I would love to find a answer to this one nagging question I keep asking myself , Can this really be a coincidence?

[upaloopa]

1. I think 9/11 will be like Pearl Harbor and JFK

assassination with lingering questions and different "experts" writing books and movies with various new facts and conspiracy theories from now until the end if time.

[wildbilln864]

2. no! not IMO. n/t

[Politicalboi]

3. Perhaps if Jeb runs

Some gutsy reporter will ask him about PNAC. PNAC is as coincidental as the 2.3 TRILLION gone missing at the Pentagon and announced on 09/10/01, then ALL the paperwork to find that money is attacked and gone forever. My question would be How come we only get one blurry video of the attack at our biggest DEFENSE building and nobody seems to think that is odd. Or that the Pentagon got hit 40 minutes AFTER the second tower, and the Pentagon did NOTHING to protect itself or D.C.

[thecrow]

4. I still find it odd that there was an exercise

that had a plane crash into the Pentagon. Was it scheduled for 9-11?
Is that why the jets were so slow in coming?
Why the pilots asked , "IS THIS REAL TIME?"

And Condi saying "Who could have imagined that jets would crash into buildings?"...

I think it will ever be like JFK or Area 51 in the legends of conspiracy.

[villager]

5. There are lots of nagging questions. They will remain because we were never told the truth.

What I mean by that -- rather than advocate any particular theory here -- is that there were no committees immediately set up in Congress to investigate what happened. (Unlike previous national catastrophes).

When a committee was belatedly set up, certain people were allowed to testify not-under-oath. Many lines of questioning were restricted. Etc., etc.

No one has been allowed to get at the truth, whatever it might be. For whatever reason -- conspiracy, protection of the Saudis, you name it -- it continues to be a whitewash.

So reasonable people will, reasonably, continue to have questions.

[phil89]

6. Yes. Coincidences happen.

Sorry.

[NuclearDem]

7. Oh dear.

[uppityperson]

8. Locking as does not meet GD SOP.

GD

Statement of Purpose

Discuss politics, issues, and current events. Posts about Israel/Palestine, religion, guns, showbiz, or sports are restricted in this forum. Conspiracy theories and disruptive meta-discussion are forbidden. For more information, click here.

Consider reposting in Creative Speculation.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=forum&id=1135
CS

Statement of Purpose

Discuss conspiracy theories and other highly-speculative topics. Free-thinkers and skeptics are both welcome. When posting, please be mindful of the DU Terms of Service.