Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTed Cruz’s “back-bencher” problem: Why the right-wing hero is in serious denial
Like Obama did, Cruz has very little experience in the Senate. Here's why that's a problem for the nut's campaignJIM NEWELL
Experience, in and of itself, is one of those overrated things people talk about in presidential campaigns. Its a factor, sure, but it doesnt correlate well with someones knowledge or ability to perform. You can be a professional dumpster diver for your whole life, but if you know what youre talking about, and can convince a country of 300 million people that you know what youre talking about over the course of a two-year campaign, then fine.
When Barack Obama announced his candidacy in 2007, he had served as a United States senator for two years. But he was able to convince a solid majority of the American people that he had enough knowledge of domestic and foreign policy to be president. His opponent, John McCain, had been serving in the Senate for approximately 650 years, but his platform of constant warfare with everyone on the foreign policy side and reading Alan Greenspans book on the domestic side suggested that he hadnt learned all that much, and he failed to persuade voters that he was more qualified to run the country.
The conservatives who claim that all of the worlds problems today, domestic and abroad, are the direct result of President Obamas inexperience upon taking office find themselves in an uncomfortable position with Ted Cruz. They may not all vote for Cruz, but they do generally agree that he is right in all the areas that Obama is wrong. Perhaps Cruz just learned more quickly in his two years on the job than Obama did? After all, Cruz is very smart. He has two Ivy League degrees including a J.D. from Harvard Law School. A lot like Barack Obama.
If master litigator Ted Cruz was running against Ted Cruz, Ted Cruz would argue that Ted Cruz is not experienced enough to be president. But Ted Cruz is only inadvertently running against himself. Whats his defense against those who would dare compare his level of inexperience to that of the inept Barack Obama? Cruz tried out a line on political independent Glenn Becks radio show yesterday.
more
http://www.salon.com/2015/03/25/ted_cruzs_back_bencher_problem_why_the_right_wing_hero_is_in_serious_denial/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 558 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ted Cruz’s “back-bencher” problem: Why the right-wing hero is in serious denial (Original Post)
DonViejo
Mar 2015
OP
Doctor of Laws of God trumps a Doctor of Laws of Men ever time for the American Taliban.
Fred Sanders
Mar 2015
#1
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)1. Doctor of Laws of God trumps a Doctor of Laws of Men ever time for the American Taliban.
thevoiceofreason
(3,440 posts)2. Cruz is not a litigator
He is an appellate lawyer - different breed.
Faux pas
(14,696 posts)3. "right-wing hero"
more like right-wing ZERO.