Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
Thu Mar 26, 2015, 11:21 PM Mar 2015

CBS Poll: 26% of Americans now have a favorable view of Hillary Clinton

CBS
March 26, 2015

Most Americans (65 percent) say their opinion of Clinton has not changed in the wake of the email controversy, but 29 percent say their opinion of her has grown worse. Forty-nine percent of Republicans say their opinion of her is worse, as do 28 percent of independents.

More generally, 26 percent of Americans now have a favorable view of Hillary Clinton, while 37 percent view her unfavorably; another third are undecided or don't have an opinion of her. As Clinton weighs a presidential bid, her favorable views are 12 points lower than they were in the fall of 2013, just months after leaving her position as secretary of state. Her unfavorable views have ticked up slightly, but the percentage that is undecided about her has risen eight points.

Clinton's highest favorable rating in CBS News polling occurred in March 2009, early in her tenure as Secretary of State, when 58 percent of Americans viewed her favorably. Clinton received her lowest favorable rating - 24 percent - in June 2003, soon after the publication of her memoir Living History....

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/views-on-hillary-clinton-and-the-email-controversy/
46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
CBS Poll: 26% of Americans now have a favorable view of Hillary Clinton (Original Post) RiverLover Mar 2015 OP
She will still be the next president. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #1
Okay, CBS voice vote aspirant Mar 2015 #5
74 percent against her running or won't vote for her? hrmjustin Mar 2015 #9
What does it matter. aspirant Mar 2015 #12
Probably not, but she is likely to be the next Democratic nominee. Donald Ian Rankin Mar 2015 #18
Then we're truly screwn. Scuba Mar 2015 #20
Eeyup. nt hifiguy Mar 2015 #25
Tried to tell so many Democrats who are hell bent on supporting this woman. Can't stand the Clintons Liberal_Stalwart71 Mar 2015 #37
Oh enough of that nonsense. And your alternative is??? (And please, don't say Warren.) RBInMaine Mar 2015 #40
lol. absurd. Anything can happen- and what is for sure is that she is a shit campaigner cali Mar 2015 #31
Name me on Democrat that can beat her? hrmjustin Mar 2015 #33
And yet she got as many votes as Obama did... brooklynite Mar 2015 #38
Much better. duh. that's why he won. she had every possible advantage- and cali Mar 2015 #39
Obama only won because he made one very smart move... joeybee12 Mar 2015 #42
If ifs and ands were pots and pans and all the sea was ink and all the trees were cali Mar 2015 #46
+1 uponit7771 Mar 2015 #34
You forgot to insert the 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #2
a few other highlights in the article KMOD Mar 2015 #3
And another~ RiverLover Mar 2015 #6
77 - 16 when asking democrats. KMOD Mar 2015 #8
I would agree that Hillary is a strong leader. Maedhros Mar 2015 #32
What part of *inevitable* don't the Proles understand? MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #4
! DeSwiss Mar 2015 #14
Considering the kinds of scandals and so-called scandals I've seen come and go... Silent3 Mar 2015 #7
Her foolish email practice is just a pre-game issue. morningfog Mar 2015 #10
I have a generally favorable view of her Scootaloo Mar 2015 #11
Talk about damning with faint praise! DeSwiss Mar 2015 #16
Unfortunately for the so-called progressives with no candidate alcibiades_mystery Mar 2015 #13
Remind me again? demwing Mar 2015 #21
Oh, I'll happily support whichever Dem wins the nomination alcibiades_mystery Mar 2015 #22
That's the Dems biggest problem...we eat our own far joeybee12 Mar 2015 #43
You know, the Clintons always bounce back, for better or for worse. Wella Mar 2015 #15
.... DeSwiss Mar 2015 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author RandiFan1290 Mar 2015 #19
Kick woo me with science Mar 2015 #23
Shame on those 26% FiveGoodMen Mar 2015 #24
That's what I say. RiverLover Mar 2015 #27
Of course they do when the media spends 100% of the time painting her as a horrible shrill woman LynneSin Mar 2015 #26
+1 joeybee12 Mar 2015 #44
That's incredibly different from another poll Prism Mar 2015 #28
Money-money-mo-ney Android3.14 Mar 2015 #30
I wonder who paid for this poll? Dawson Leery Mar 2015 #36
Ruh-Roh Android3.14 Mar 2015 #29
the media's work is done. the GOP thanks the gnewz. pansypoo53219 Mar 2015 #35
SHIT poll with skewed SPIN from PIECE OF SHIT corporate SHIT media. And, polls mean NOTHING now. RBInMaine Mar 2015 #41
Maybe people are finally sick of her after 23 FUCKING YEARS?!? BlueStater Mar 2015 #45

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
18. Probably not, but she is likely to be the next Democratic nominee.
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 05:27 AM
Mar 2015

With one exception, no party has held the presidency for 12 years since the war. Whoever the Democrats nominate is going to have to a severely uphill struggle to overcome the millstone of incumbency.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
37. Tried to tell so many Democrats who are hell bent on supporting this woman. Can't stand the Clintons
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 03:47 PM
Mar 2015

The Democratic Party is making a HUGE mistake and will put a fucking Bush right back into office--all because the Clintons and their worshippers are so entitled.

 

RBInMaine

(13,570 posts)
40. Oh enough of that nonsense. And your alternative is??? (And please, don't say Warren.)
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 07:08 PM
Mar 2015

Warren's not running and could not win anyway. Forget Bernie. He's a confirmed "socialist" so is DOA.

Who else? Hillary is PROGRESSIVE (though not TeaLeft Purist), qualified, and ready on day one.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
31. lol. absurd. Anything can happen- and what is for sure is that she is a shit campaigner
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 02:49 PM
Mar 2015

she was just not up to it in 2008 despite her ENORMOUS advantages. I see no reason to think that has changed.

brooklynite

(94,568 posts)
38. And yet she got as many votes as Obama did...
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 03:48 PM
Mar 2015

...was he a BETTER campaigner? Sure. But you're hard-pressed to point to any evidence she's a bad one.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
39. Much better. duh. that's why he won. she had every possible advantage- and
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 06:52 PM
Mar 2015

managed to lose.

Hard pressed? Hardly.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
42. Obama only won because he made one very smart move...
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 07:11 PM
Mar 2015

Concentrated on Iowa and got recognition...had he lost Iowa, he would might have been a one-term senator.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
46. If ifs and ands were pots and pans and all the sea was ink and all the trees were
Sat Mar 28, 2015, 12:58 PM
Mar 2015

bread and cheese, what would there be to drink?

So why did Hill blow it so badly in Iowa? How?

 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
3. a few other highlights in the article
Thu Mar 26, 2015, 11:36 PM
Mar 2015
Clinton gets more positive assessments on leadership and empathy. Fifty-seven percent says she has strong qualities of leadership, while 38 percent don't think she does.


More than half of Americans (56 percent) think Clinton cares about the needs and problems of people like themselves


Most independents think Clinton is a strong leader and half say she cares about their problems

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
6. And another~
Thu Mar 26, 2015, 11:38 PM
Mar 2015
When asked to evaluate Hillary Clinton on some key characteristics, the public gives Clinton her most negative marks on honesty. Fewer than half - 42 percent- say she is honest and trustworthy, while more - 47 percent - don't think she is.
 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
8. 77 - 16 when asking democrats.
Thu Mar 26, 2015, 11:44 PM
Mar 2015

But yes, she is not winning over any independents on that, and republicans obviously hate her.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
32. I would agree that Hillary is a strong leader.
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 02:58 PM
Mar 2015

I just believe she's helping to lead us off a cliff.

Silent3

(15,212 posts)
7. Considering the kinds of scandals and so-called scandals I've seen come and go...
Thu Mar 26, 2015, 11:38 PM
Mar 2015

Last edited Fri Mar 27, 2015, 12:39 AM - Edit history (1)

...during elections over the years, it's hard to imagine this whole email server thing turning out to be much more than a footnote in this campaign when all is said and done, no matter how much temporary effect it might have now while there's so little else going on for the media to latch onto.

Hillary, or any other Democrat, will start to look better and better as the next Republican clown car begins to form, especially when it's off to such a promising start with Ted Cruz.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
10. Her foolish email practice is just a pre-game issue.
Thu Mar 26, 2015, 11:50 PM
Mar 2015

There will be far worse, actual scandals, attached to each of the republicans who announce as well as to Hillary.

What remains to be seen is which scandals are the worst and which ones break at the best (or worst) time.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
11. I have a generally favorable view of her
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 12:11 AM
Mar 2015

Just not towards the idea of her as president. it's like that friend you like a lot, that you would never allow to drive your car.

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
21. Remind me again?
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 08:03 AM
Mar 2015

1. who are the fake progressives and who are the real ?

2. There must be a strong list of declared candidates. Care to share yours?

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
22. Oh, I'll happily support whichever Dem wins the nomination
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 09:12 AM
Mar 2015

I'm not interested in spending a whole bunch of time tearing any one of the possibles down.

So called progressives, in my definition, are those who manage to create worse conditions for people in their fanatical desire to create a world after their own image. I support progressive causes, but I don't support them in principle to the point where their opposite gets instantiated as policy and in practice. Example: Al Gore may have held a wide range of policy beliefs that I disagreed with from the Left. That said, I wouldn't attack him endlessly until, say, Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney were in charge of US foreign policy. To do so would make me a so-called progressive, since I am progressive in principle, but counter-progressive in practice.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
43. That's the Dems biggest problem...we eat our own far
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 07:12 PM
Mar 2015

more than we eat the Repukes. That needs to change...seems like the gloves go back on once the primary ends.

 

Wella

(1,827 posts)
15. You know, the Clintons always bounce back, for better or for worse.
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 02:24 AM
Mar 2015

We'll see what happens. I don't count her out yet.

Response to RiverLover (Original post)

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
26. Of course they do when the media spends 100% of the time painting her as a horrible shrill woman
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 02:02 PM
Mar 2015

Last edited Sat Mar 28, 2015, 01:06 AM - Edit history (2)

Look I know the woman isn't a saint but she isn't the spawn of satan either. I don't know how any woman has managed to stay in the public eye as long as Hillary Clinton despite as much media shit thrown her way. Some of it has been deserved but much of it like Benghazi and this Email 'Scandal' has been so blown out of proportion.

Lesser men would have received half the shit Hillary has received and still have crumpled under the pressure.

BlueStater

(7,596 posts)
45. Maybe people are finally sick of her after 23 FUCKING YEARS?!?
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 07:31 PM
Mar 2015

It's totally ridiculous that very few people are willing to challenge her for the nomination. Where's the next generation of leaders, for pete's fucking sake? Sickening.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CBS Poll: 26% of America...