Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:49 PM Apr 2015

"Hater" is quite simply the dumbest Goddam term in the DU lexicon.

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by NH Ethylene (a host of the General Discussion forum).

And I'm personally sick of seeing it.

It's a shortcut to thinking. If you deploy it, doing so makes you look like an idiot.

It's not "hate." It's honest disagreement based on legitimate reasons.

It's debate.

If you can't handle it, go find another hobby.

98 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Hater" is quite simply the dumbest Goddam term in the DU lexicon. (Original Post) WilliamPitt Apr 2015 OP
H8r. KamaAina Apr 2015 #1
Db8r !! Gidney N Cloyd Apr 2015 #21
And a GREAT one! One might even say ... 11 Bravo Apr 2015 #73
I'm a farty-whiner and cheatriot hater!!! madinmaryland Apr 2015 #42
Sounds like you are a hater also! :-) Logical Apr 2015 #2
Agreed. H2O Man Apr 2015 #3
Oh, I can think of a dumber one. MineralMan Apr 2015 #4
Clever. WilliamPitt Apr 2015 #7
Nah. Not sleepy. MineralMan Apr 2015 #8
Yeah, that's not debate tkmorris Apr 2015 #24
Well, I'm sure he appreciates your defense. MineralMan Apr 2015 #27
Ibid. WilliamPitt Apr 2015 #29
It did not sound like a defense to me. zeemike Apr 2015 #33
I agree. H2O Man Apr 2015 #35
I like to pretend criticisms against me are actually a defense of someone else too LanternWaste Apr 2015 #36
That's it right there. Rex Apr 2015 #39
Times like this make me wish I could rec a post. drokhole Apr 2015 #51
Wrong, the OP is not about Politicians. n/t sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #70
I can't, the ridiculous, childish use of that word reminds of the stupidity of FRs whose mental sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #69
They are also very nasty haters. BeanMusical Apr 2015 #83
That's what reminds me of the far right, Freepers, et al. Nasty with zero interest in any kind of sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #86
Resorting to such H2O Man Apr 2015 #95
Shh. I'd rather not discourage its use, as it's a great way to filter out crap. n/t winter is coming Apr 2015 #5
Well, you have a point there. sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #72
It's not "DU lexicon". Are you not aware of all internet traditions? PeaceNikki Apr 2015 #6
Is calling the Republicans "Hate Mongers" acceptable - because they are! patricia92243 Apr 2015 #9
Some people appear to diagree based on legitimate reasons gollygee Apr 2015 #10
I agree with all you said, except.... bvar22 Apr 2015 #49
It's fair to not like the logo gollygee Apr 2015 #97
people are just looking for reasons to criticize at that point. AlbertCat Apr 2015 #54
It's just laziness and projection. morningfog Apr 2015 #11
I hate "Haters". Lint Head Apr 2015 #12
I think there are a few haters on this site. hrmjustin Apr 2015 #13
I'd nominate either "woo" or "anti-vaxxer", lol. closeupready Apr 2015 #14
Those words most likely came from a Big Pharma Think Tank. When words are repeatedly used over sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #88
Backbackbackback... it's... it's... OUTTA HERE! Another home run for William Pitt. n/t cherokeeprogressive Apr 2015 #15
Shake it Off. PeaceNikki Apr 2015 #16
I don't think he'll get your reference, which is why he also doesn't understand the current use okaawhatever Apr 2015 #65
I would add -bot and cheerleader tammywammy Apr 2015 #17
ahem... (ordinarily I'd agree but).... hlthe2b Apr 2015 #18
I would probably rate... MattSh Apr 2015 #19
"And I'm personally sick of seeing it." sufrommich Apr 2015 #20
You know what they say... NightWatcher Apr 2015 #22
I nominate "wake up" and "sheeple" if we're starting a list. Gidney N Cloyd Apr 2015 #23
"Congresscritter" bugs me, can it be added, please? PeaceNikki Apr 2015 #26
I nominate "Goddam". Aldo Leopold Apr 2015 #25
Bingo. mmonk Apr 2015 #28
I hate your post. You're pretty cool though... BlueJazz Apr 2015 #30
Wake up, sheeple! gratuitous Apr 2015 #31
NARWHAL! OnyxCollie Apr 2015 #68
Indeed - a little disappointed in WRP gratuitous Apr 2015 #82
Thank you. JDPriestly Apr 2015 #32
Actually, what's stupid is people who claim if you don't like Hillary you hate ALL WOMEN.... Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2015 #34
So you're going to stop using it? Starry Messenger Apr 2015 #37
I never have used it. WilliamPitt Apr 2015 #77
Word //\\ G_j Apr 2015 #38
Hater (n.) kentauros Apr 2015 #40
When someone links to The Blaze workinclasszero Apr 2015 #41
Can we just refer to them as "nattering nabobs of negativity"? madinmaryland Apr 2015 #43
"hater " is for people who say "lets party " olddots Apr 2015 #44
So you missed the "Hillary parks in handicapped parking spot" threads? Trying to pretend KittyWampus Apr 2015 #45
Just shake it off. Tommy_Carcetti Apr 2015 #46
and what is the education level of those who use it? nt antigop Apr 2015 #47
It's very childish fadedrose Apr 2015 #48
yep. It's a shows a lack of critical thinking skills. nt antigop Apr 2015 #50
Lay off the haterade. Texasgal Apr 2015 #52
If that's true... Shemp Howard Apr 2015 #53
Dubmber then DERP?! A-Schwarzenegger Apr 2015 #55
No. But opinions are like assholes. PeaceNikki Apr 2015 #60
Actually, everyone's got LOTS of opinions. A-Schwarzenegger Apr 2015 #63
Perhaps those who have declared hate towards Hillary will evolve on this issue. Thinkingabout Apr 2015 #56
Debaters gonna debate. nt tblue37 Apr 2015 #57
LOL. Most of the people here won't get that but it's funny... nt okaawhatever Apr 2015 #71
Rofl alcibiades_mystery Apr 2015 #58
K & R Thespian2 Apr 2015 #59
This message was self-deleted by its author SidDithers Apr 2015 #61
Agreed... sendero Apr 2015 #62
K and R bigwillq Apr 2015 #64
In some cases, yes. riqster Apr 2015 #66
Br8tr! valerief Apr 2015 #67
It's a handicap. OnyxCollie Apr 2015 #74
"Simply" is the third most extraneous word on DU. DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2015 #75
Remember what we said about George W. Bush followers? democrank Apr 2015 #76
Please stop saying defenders are "apologists". We're not apologizing for anything. NT PBass Apr 2015 #78
A lot of people think if they can just slap the right ad hominem label on someone Warren DeMontague Apr 2015 #79
I don't know about that... Rex Apr 2015 #80
You're one to talk. joshcryer Apr 2015 #81
+1 Blue_Tires Apr 2015 #84
Really, so posting pictures of Clinton as an aged, ugly queen BainsBane Apr 2015 #85
+1 one_voice Apr 2015 #90
Yep. 99Forever Apr 2015 #87
Thank you. This has been driving me crazy for several months. enough Apr 2015 #89
IOW I don't hate Hillary… she is just dead wrong on some things. Agony Apr 2015 #91
Very much... onyourleft Apr 2015 #92
How about 'bater? awoke_in_2003 Apr 2015 #93
Agreed. 2banon Apr 2015 #94
Don't say hateful things, and you'll never have to worry about having the word thrown your way. nt MADem Apr 2015 #96
We are locking this. Chemisse Apr 2015 #98
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
1. H8r.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:52 PM
Apr 2015

Gidney N Cloyd

(19,847 posts)
21. Db8r !!
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:24 PM
Apr 2015

11 Bravo

(23,926 posts)
73. And a GREAT one! One might even say ...
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:33 PM
Apr 2015

a MASTERDb8r!

(This is not aimed at anyone, I simply saw a shot to employ a very old joke, and I took it.)

madinmaryland

(64,933 posts)
42. I'm a farty-whiner and cheatriot hater!!!
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:01 PM
Apr 2015
 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
2. Sounds like you are a hater also! :-)
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:52 PM
Apr 2015

H2O Man

(73,622 posts)
3. Agreed.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:52 PM
Apr 2015

MineralMan

(146,331 posts)
4. Oh, I can think of a dumber one.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:53 PM
Apr 2015

Starts with POS.

 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
7. Clever.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:55 PM
Apr 2015

Go back to bed.

MineralMan

(146,331 posts)
8. Nah. Not sleepy.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:58 PM
Apr 2015

You're the one that brought up hating on politicians, right? IOKIYAWP, I guess. It's debate, as you said. You should be used to it.

tkmorris

(11,138 posts)
24. Yeah, that's not debate
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:29 PM
Apr 2015

It's avoiding debate through snark. Which the post you reference clearly was not, whatever you may think of it's content.

But you know all of this. You just have a little WP shaped chip on your shoulder.

MineralMan

(146,331 posts)
27. Well, I'm sure he appreciates your defense.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:32 PM
Apr 2015

That's really nice of you.

 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
29. Ibid.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:37 PM
Apr 2015

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
33. It did not sound like a defense to me.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:39 PM
Apr 2015

It sounded like an observation.

H2O Man

(73,622 posts)
35. I agree.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:41 PM
Apr 2015
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
36. I like to pretend criticisms against me are actually a defense of someone else too
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:41 PM
Apr 2015

I like to pretend criticisms against me are actually a defense of someone else too. It lets us maintain the ethical pretense the we're above the fray, when really all we do is merely add more petulant fuel to the fire.

Really nice, indeed.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
39. That's it right there.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:44 PM
Apr 2015

Pretending to be above the fray, nail it!

drokhole

(1,230 posts)
51. Times like this make me wish I could rec a post.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:12 PM
Apr 2015

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
70. Wrong, the OP is not about Politicians. n/t
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:33 PM
Apr 2015

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
69. I can't, the ridiculous, childish use of that word reminds of the stupidity of FRs whose mental
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:31 PM
Apr 2015

agility resembles that of a rock.

BeanMusical

(4,389 posts)
83. They are also very nasty haters.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 06:05 PM
Apr 2015

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
86. That's what reminds me of the far right, Freepers, et al. Nasty with zero interest in any kind of
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 06:10 PM
Apr 2015

intelligent discussion. Just disrupters, the goal appears to be to disrupt this forum.

H2O Man

(73,622 posts)
95. Resorting to such
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 06:25 PM
Apr 2015

mindless, shallow nonsense represents a shortcut to rational thinking.

It is a shortcut that too many of our friends here attempt.

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
5. Shh. I'd rather not discourage its use, as it's a great way to filter out crap. n/t
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:54 PM
Apr 2015

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
72. Well, you have a point there.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:33 PM
Apr 2015

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
6. It's not "DU lexicon". Are you not aware of all internet traditions?
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:54 PM
Apr 2015

patricia92243

(12,601 posts)
9. Is calling the Republicans "Hate Mongers" acceptable - because they are!
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:58 PM
Apr 2015

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
10. Some people appear to diagree based on legitimate reasons
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:02 PM
Apr 2015

and some have really stupid posts just attacking because they don't like her.

There are plenty of legitimate reasons to criticize Clinton, but her hair, or a picture, or her logo, or whatever else - people are just looking for reasons to criticize at that point.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
49. I agree with all you said, except....
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:10 PM
Apr 2015

Her new LOGO sucks ass.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
97. It's fair to not like the logo
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 06:31 PM
Apr 2015

but we had people saying it was evidence she'd make a horrible president. That's just silly.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
54. people are just looking for reasons to criticize at that point.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:18 PM
Apr 2015

Well, one need not look too hard or long.

There's no need to even go after the hair....

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
11. It's just laziness and projection.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:02 PM
Apr 2015

Lint Head

(15,064 posts)
12. I hate "Haters".
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:06 PM
Apr 2015
 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
13. I think there are a few haters on this site.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:06 PM
Apr 2015

But I think the clear majority of us like honest debate.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
14. I'd nominate either "woo" or "anti-vaxxer", lol.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:07 PM
Apr 2015

Both words make those using them seem high school.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
88. Those words most likely came from a Big Pharma Think Tank. When words are repeatedly used over
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 06:14 PM
Apr 2015

and over and people don't use their own words, as most ordinary people do, you can BET they are paid for propaganda by those with a vested interest in silencing their detractors.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
15. Backbackbackback... it's... it's... OUTTA HERE! Another home run for William Pitt. n/t
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:08 PM
Apr 2015

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
16. Shake it Off.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:12 PM
Apr 2015

okaawhatever

(9,462 posts)
65. I don't think he'll get your reference, which is why he also doesn't understand the current use
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:28 PM
Apr 2015

of the word "hater". I'm over it all... I just wanna shake...

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
17. I would add -bot and cheerleader
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:13 PM
Apr 2015

Any time I see a poster using stupid juvenile names I just discount their entire post.

hlthe2b

(102,378 posts)
18. ahem... (ordinarily I'd agree but)....
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:15 PM
Apr 2015
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6511390

When you have some here (however few) overtly and proudly manifesting hate for our leading announced Democratic Party candidate at this point, it does seem to go waaaay past "honest disagreement based on legitimate reasons"....

Like you, I have no problem debating and seeing both defenders and detractors. That's what DU is for. But when some here claim "HATE" for the candidate without offering a reason why they would, well, it is inexplicable to me.

MattSh

(3,714 posts)
19. I would probably rate...
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:15 PM
Apr 2015

"bootlickers" as worse than hater.

And for all the same reasons you mention.

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
20. "And I'm personally sick of seeing it."
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:17 PM
Apr 2015

You sound like a father admonishing his children.

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
22. You know what they say...
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:24 PM
Apr 2015


I prefer "Naysayers" as it's more refined and classy than Hater gon hate.

Gidney N Cloyd

(19,847 posts)
23. I nominate "wake up" and "sheeple" if we're starting a list.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:27 PM
Apr 2015

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
26. "Congresscritter" bugs me, can it be added, please?
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:32 PM
Apr 2015

Aldo Leopold

(685 posts)
25. I nominate "Goddam".
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:30 PM
Apr 2015

mmonk

(52,589 posts)
28. Bingo.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:34 PM
Apr 2015
 

BlueJazz

(25,348 posts)
30. I hate your post. You're pretty cool though...
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:38 PM
Apr 2015

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
31. Wake up, sheeple!
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:38 PM
Apr 2015

Your goddam hater ways are going to make me write my congresscritter, because you're taking away all my choicest words! This woo thread of anti-vaxxing haterade (forgot that one, didn't you all?) makes you look like a bunch of bootlicker-bots and cheerleaders.

Swordfish!

 

OnyxCollie

(9,958 posts)
68. NARWHAL!
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:31 PM
Apr 2015

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
82. Indeed - a little disappointed in WRP
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 06:04 PM
Apr 2015

I figured for sure the "swordfish" mention would get his attention.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
32. Thank you.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:39 PM
Apr 2015

DU is traditionally a pretty sophisticated forum. We expect a certain ability on posters' parts to defend what they claim they believe.

It's that simple.

It's not hate. It's debate.

As a country, we need to aspire to the be the very best society we can be. That's the goal.

On DU, debate, discussion, listening, paying attention, learning, being willing to change an opinion and then being willing to work to change our society for the better.

Those are the means to our goal.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
34. Actually, what's stupid is people who claim if you don't like Hillary you hate ALL WOMEN....
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:41 PM
Apr 2015

Last edited Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:26 PM - Edit history (1)

...thus totally ignoring support for Warren.

Or, if you are against the TPP that means you are an isolationist who doesn't believe we should have trade with ANY country. Or worse, you are an anti-capitalist and that's that's akin to a commie so you probably worship Satan too.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
37. So you're going to stop using it?
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:42 PM
Apr 2015
 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
77. I never have used it.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:45 PM
Apr 2015

Prove me wrong. I'll wait.

G_j

(40,372 posts)
38. Word //\\
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:42 PM
Apr 2015

kentauros

(29,414 posts)
40. Hater (n.)
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:46 PM
Apr 2015
hater (n.)
late 14c., "one who hates, an enemy," agent noun from hate (v.).


hate (v.)
Old English hatian "to hate," from Proto-Germanic *haton (cognates: Old Saxon haton, Old Norse hata, German hassen, Gothic hatan "to hate&quot , from PIE root *kad- "sorrow, hatred" (cognates: Avestan sadra- "grief, sorrow, calamity," Greek kedos "care, trouble, sorrow," Welsh cas "pain, anger&quot . Related: Hated; hating. French haine (n.), hair (v.) are Germanic. Hate crime attested from 1988.

hate (n.)
Old English hete "hatred, spite," from Proto-Germanic *hatis- (cognates: Old Norse hattr, Old Frisian hat, Dutch haat, Old High German has, German Hass, Gothic hatis; see hate (v.)). Altered in Middle English to conform with the verb. Hate mail is first attested 1967.


With that kind of history, I'd say "hater" has a legitimate use on DU, unlike "woo" which is an onomatopoeia word for a sound.
 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
41. When someone links to The Blaze
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:48 PM
Apr 2015

Or other teahaddist websites in an attempt to slam...who else?....Hillary, they richly deserve the title h8er.

IMHO, of course.

madinmaryland

(64,933 posts)
43. Can we just refer to them as "nattering nabobs of negativity"?
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:04 PM
Apr 2015
 

olddots

(10,237 posts)
44. "hater " is for people who say "lets party "
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:06 PM
Apr 2015

I'll leave it at that .

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
45. So you missed the "Hillary parks in handicapped parking spot" threads? Trying to pretend
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:08 PM
Apr 2015

that it's all reasoned debate getting posted here is ridiculous.

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,199 posts)
46. Just shake it off.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:08 PM
Apr 2015

Shake it off.

antigop

(12,778 posts)
47. and what is the education level of those who use it? nt
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:10 PM
Apr 2015

fadedrose

(10,044 posts)
48. It's very childish
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:10 PM
Apr 2015

reminds me of kids in 4th grade....

That's the best they can do, apparently.

Now that she's started talking, all I've heard her say is what Warren has said. Right words, wrong music.

antigop

(12,778 posts)
50. yep. It's a shows a lack of critical thinking skills. nt
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:11 PM
Apr 2015

Texasgal

(17,048 posts)
52. Lay off the haterade.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:17 PM
Apr 2015

Stick to water.

Shemp Howard

(889 posts)
53. If that's true...
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:17 PM
Apr 2015

...then the unnecessary swearing is a close second.

A-Schwarzenegger

(15,596 posts)
55. Dubmber then DERP?!
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:18 PM
Apr 2015

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
60. No. But opinions are like assholes.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:24 PM
Apr 2015

A-Schwarzenegger

(15,596 posts)
63. Actually, everyone's got LOTS of opinions.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:27 PM
Apr 2015

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
56. Perhaps those who have declared hate towards Hillary will evolve on this issue.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:21 PM
Apr 2015

tblue37

(65,489 posts)
57. Debaters gonna debate. nt
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:21 PM
Apr 2015

okaawhatever

(9,462 posts)
71. LOL. Most of the people here won't get that but it's funny... nt
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:33 PM
Apr 2015
 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
58. Rofl
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:23 PM
Apr 2015


Thespian2

(2,741 posts)
59. K & R
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:23 PM
Apr 2015

Response to WilliamPitt (Original post)

sendero

(28,552 posts)
62. Agreed...
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:27 PM
Apr 2015

..... it's just a way to shut down a debate using stupidity.

 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
64. K and R
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:28 PM
Apr 2015

riqster

(13,986 posts)
66. In some cases, yes.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:29 PM
Apr 2015

But in other cases, sad to say, hate happens.

valerief

(53,235 posts)
67. Br8tr!
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:30 PM
Apr 2015
 

OnyxCollie

(9,958 posts)
74. It's a handicap.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:34 PM
Apr 2015

With "hater," even the most politically-ignorant can play right alongside Will Pitt.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
75. "Simply" is the third most extraneous word on DU.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:37 PM
Apr 2015

And the word "methinks" gets double billing as both the second dumbest goddamned word on DU and as the number one most-used-for-no-reason archaic word. Also, going undercover at FR to report back here is the twelfth dumbest action taken by the set of DUers with more than five years of membership under the belt.

democrank

(11,109 posts)
76. Remember what we said about George W. Bush followers?
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:38 PM
Apr 2015

Remember how we used to pulverize them because they followed in lockstep and seem to not think for themselves? Remember all the.... How can they blindly follow.... remarks?

There may be a few exceptions, but I rather doubt that most DUers who don`t support Hillary actually hate her. Hillary Clinton isn`t my favorite candidate, but I certainly don`t hate her. I didn`t support her when she ran against President Obama and I`m a bit cautious about jumping on her band wagon now.

I`m not crazy about Trial Balloon Candidates, who have to "focus group" logos, changes in positions, ideas. I prefer someone genuine who behaves the same way when no one is looking. Someone who has the same principles no matter if he/she is talking with a crowd of wealthy bankers or a group of homeless veterans. One of the worst things I`ve seen happen to our politicians is this phony "branding" BS, the stuff the 30-somethings chat about on The Cycle. It`s temporary image-making which could change in a flash, depending on what the focus group thinks. Our country needs a grounded, principled candidate who has honest, firsthand knowledge of what people in this country are going through. We don`t need a candidate who playacts to get a vote, we need someone genuine.

PBass

(1,537 posts)
78. Please stop saying defenders are "apologists". We're not apologizing for anything. NT
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:52 PM
Apr 2015

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
79. A lot of people think if they can just slap the right ad hominem label on someone
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:56 PM
Apr 2015

that negates having to engage them intellectually.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
80. I don't know about that...
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:56 PM
Apr 2015

Maybe.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
81. You're one to talk.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:57 PM
Apr 2015

Shit, I usually use the term "detractor" but in your special case "hater" might actually qualify.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
84. +1
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 06:05 PM
Apr 2015

BainsBane

(53,072 posts)
85. Really, so posting pictures of Clinton as an aged, ugly queen
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 06:06 PM
Apr 2015

Is an issue? What issue would that be? Women need to stay in their place and not rule over men?

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
90. +1
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 06:16 PM
Apr 2015

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
87. Yep.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 06:10 PM
Apr 2015

Weak minded idiots, at that.

enough

(13,262 posts)
89. Thank you. This has been driving me crazy for several months.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 06:15 PM
Apr 2015

Introducing the word "hater" into any exchange immediately brings the conversation down to pointlessness and name calling.

Agony

(2,605 posts)
91. IOW I don't hate Hillary… she is just dead wrong on some things.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 06:17 PM
Apr 2015

some serious things…

not about hate.

wrong.

onyourleft

(726 posts)
92. Very much...
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 06:20 PM
Apr 2015

...agree.

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
93. How about 'bater?
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 06:22 PM
Apr 2015
 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
94. Agreed.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 06:23 PM
Apr 2015

MADem

(135,425 posts)
96. Don't say hateful things, and you'll never have to worry about having the word thrown your way. nt
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 06:27 PM
Apr 2015

Chemisse

(30,817 posts)
98. We are locking this.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 06:32 PM
Apr 2015

Threads complaining about Democratic Underground or its members are not permitted in GD.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Hater" is quit...