Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLOL-- USA Today posts pre-written article about Boston bombing sentence....
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/05/14/boston-marathon-bombing-sentence/27336839/
BOSTON The jury has ruled: a
LIFE IN PRISON/DEATH
sentence for Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.
After (NUMBER) hours OR DAYS of deliberations, the federal jury delivered its verdict, capping a (NUMBER)-day trial and closing one of the most painful chapters in Boston's history.
The judgment came from the same group of seven women and five men who found Tsarnaev guilty on all 30 counts related to the April 15, 2013, bomb attacks and four-day manhunt. The jury found him responsible for killing four people, seriously maiming 17 and injuring hundreds more.
In the end, it all came down to one question: Should Tsarnaev be put to death or spend the rest of his life in a federal prison with no possibility of parole?
In reaching their verdict, the jurors weighed 12 aggravating factors against 21 mitigating factors. They were charged to consider the suffering Tsarnaev caused, his intent, his character and his relationships, among other things. The panel decided LIFE IN PRISON / DEATH was the penalty best suited not only to the crimes but also to the man who committed them.
(snip)
more@link until it disappears, LOL.
BOSTON The jury has ruled: a
LIFE IN PRISON/DEATH
sentence for Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.
After (NUMBER) hours OR DAYS of deliberations, the federal jury delivered its verdict, capping a (NUMBER)-day trial and closing one of the most painful chapters in Boston's history.
The judgment came from the same group of seven women and five men who found Tsarnaev guilty on all 30 counts related to the April 15, 2013, bomb attacks and four-day manhunt. The jury found him responsible for killing four people, seriously maiming 17 and injuring hundreds more.
In the end, it all came down to one question: Should Tsarnaev be put to death or spend the rest of his life in a federal prison with no possibility of parole?
In reaching their verdict, the jurors weighed 12 aggravating factors against 21 mitigating factors. They were charged to consider the suffering Tsarnaev caused, his intent, his character and his relationships, among other things. The panel decided LIFE IN PRISON / DEATH was the penalty best suited not only to the crimes but also to the man who committed them.
(snip)
more@link until it disappears, LOL.
Oops.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 766 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
LOL-- USA Today posts pre-written article about Boston bombing sentence.... (Original Post)
mike_c
May 2015
OP
Proof that corporations have weaponized the news media, like missiles ready for launch in a silo.
Fred Sanders
May 2015
#4
Nothing wrong with this. It is just fairly standard in the rush to get the "scoop"
alphafemale
May 2015
#8
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)1. Awkward...
How amazingly pathetic/unprofessional.
Logical
(22,457 posts)3. Wow how can this be posted so long? Someone is going to have a bad night. nt
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)4. Proof that corporations have weaponized the news media, like missiles ready for launch in a silo.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)5. Lol...
The drama involved in that sentence is amazing...
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)6. Hey, when you gotta meet a deadline... nt
Logical
(22,457 posts)7. Finally removed!! nt
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)8. Nothing wrong with this. It is just fairly standard in the rush to get the "scoop"
That is a matter of seconds in today's world and not really sure it matters as much as it did in the day's of print press.
That is the intended as the first basic article.
Pure facts.
The analytic stories will come later.
And keep coming...and coming...and coming.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)9. not as bad as when they jump the gun with an obituary
which has happened