Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 07:52 AM Jun 2015

Matt Drudge headline re: Cindy Sheehan in September 2005.

https://web.archive.org/web/20050926210119/http://www.drudgereport.com/

CINDY SHEEHAN ARRESTED AT WHITE HOUSE IN CUNNING STUNT




What was Drudge trying to accomplish?

5 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
Drudge meant to call Cindy Sheehan the c-word
5 (100%)
Perfectly innocent, no misogyny intended
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Matt Drudge headline re: Cindy Sheehan in September 2005. (Original Post) geek tragedy Jun 2015 OP
K&R eom MohRokTah Jun 2015 #1
A DUer used it in 2008 about Palin. And skip participated in that thread. PeaceNikki Jun 2015 #2
The truth be told, the attitude re: sexism vs Palin geek tragedy Jun 2015 #3
Agreed. PeaceNikki Jun 2015 #4
Thank gosh that this idiocy can c9ntinue for a second day. AngryAmish Jun 2015 #5
Well, a number of apologists continue to litigate this issue geek tragedy Jun 2015 #6
Exactly the way I feel about it. But, "he really didn't use that word. the facts are on our side" Cha Jun 2015 #10
Well, he didn't spell out c***, so it's fine. NuclearDem Jun 2015 #7
Wow, one person voted "perfectly innocent no misogyny intended".. We have a drudge fan! Cha Jun 2015 #8
And a fan od sophomoric misgynistic jokes. MohRokTah Jun 2015 #9
He was a moron sharp_stick Jun 2015 #11
You would be surprised how so many people have defended it on the grounds... DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #12
It's unbelievable sharp_stick Jun 2015 #13
Their defense is if you of a certain age you wouldn't know what he was trying to convey. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #14
Do they get confused by phrases like geek tragedy Jun 2015 #15
Now now... Hekate Jun 2015 #16
I am glad you read Drudge nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #17
I don't read Drudge, but I'm aware of his antics. nt geek tragedy Jun 2015 #19
I see nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #20
Fuck Drudge, fascist pile of shit. PowerToThePeople Jun 2015 #18
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
3. The truth be told, the attitude re: sexism vs Palin
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 08:18 AM
Jun 2015

was too permissive. Exacerbated by her anti-feminist candidacy, but that's not an excuse.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
6. Well, a number of apologists continue to litigate this issue
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 08:22 AM
Jun 2015

by claiming there is nothing wrong with using that same phrase at Hillary Clinton.

When they finally stop the sophomoric attempts to justify misogyny we can move on.

Don't forget to vote in the poll.

Cha

(297,323 posts)
10. Exactly the way I feel about it. But, "he really didn't use that word. the facts are on our side"
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 09:19 AM
Jun 2015

glad they're not running the board.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
7. Well, he didn't spell out c***, so it's fine.
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 08:26 AM
Jun 2015

And even if he did, it means something else in the UK, even though he's American.

Cha

(297,323 posts)
8. Wow, one person voted "perfectly innocent no misogyny intended".. We have a drudge fan!
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 09:16 AM
Jun 2015

Drudge was trying to be clever.. it didn't work then and it's not working now.

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)
11. He was a moron
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 09:39 AM
Jun 2015

as is everyone that thinks that's a clever turn of phrase.

It's as opaque as clean glass and as old as the internet.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
12. You would be surprised how so many people have defended it on the grounds...
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 09:43 AM
Jun 2015

You would be surprised how so many people have defended it on the grounds it really wasn't what he said.

They have to be the most disingenuous or obtuse people on the planet.

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)
13. It's unbelievable
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 09:49 AM
Jun 2015

I wonder what they'd think if it was a classmate using it when referring to their daughter on Facebook.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
14. Their defense is if you of a certain age you wouldn't know what he was trying to convey.
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 09:52 AM
Jun 2015

It reminds me of an article in Vanity Fair a while back about David Geffen where a fellow Hollywood mogul who obviously wasn't fond of him called him an unusually good fellatrix.


Hekate

(90,714 posts)
16. Now now...
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 07:42 PM
Jun 2015

I've seen wallet cards purporting to be fishing licenses for "Master Baiters."

Yes, it no doubt confuses some people all to bits.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
17. I am glad you read Drudge
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 07:43 PM
Jun 2015

I don't. So you do this often? Or just to prove a point that the rest of us who did not know, and per your view should have. no dinner for me tonight... are still going to say that this was excessive, but par for the course.

So let me quote somebody else in Republican land.

The presidential press secretary, Ari Fleischer, condemned Bill Maher's irreverent comic response to 9/11 by reminding "all Americans that they need to watch what they say, watch what they do." Fear itself—the fear that "paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance," as FDR had it—was already being wielded as a weapon against Americans by their own government.


And we are indeed at that point.



So we will now watch what we say on this site. Well I have since I came back. No use in feeding the usual crowd.

I expect this to be alerted, possibly hidden as well... perhaps worst.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Matt Drudge headline re: ...