Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 09:16 AM Jun 2015

South Carolina becomes first US state to take action against anti-Israel boycotts

WASHINGTON – South Carolina’s governor has signed into law a bill to stop efforts to boycott, divest and sanction Israel on Thursday afternoon, in a first for the nation on a statewide level.

The bill makes no mention of Israel directly, but prevents public entities from contracting with businesses engaging in the “boycott of a person or an entity based in or doing business with a jurisdiction with whom South Carolina can enjoy open trade.”

The premise of the law is that the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement, colloquially known as BDS, discriminates against the people of Israel and weakens the economy of South Carolina.

“Boycott,” for the purposes of the law, is defined as the effort by companies to “blacklist, divest from or otherwise refuse to deal with a person or firm when the action is based on race, color, religion, gender or national origin of the targeted person or entity,” according to the text.

Companies also must agree not to engage in boycott activities going forward.


more
http://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/South-Carolina-becomes-first-US-state-to-take-action-against-anti-Israel-boycotts-405120

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
South Carolina becomes first US state to take action against anti-Israel boycotts (Original Post) n2doc Jun 2015 OP
I thought the right wing was against government restrictions on business? BillZBubb Jun 2015 #1
how can this be constitutional? cali Jun 2015 #2
Unenforcible, surely. malthaussen Jun 2015 #5
It is constitutional, GGJohn Jun 2015 #7
So on this basis, I guess the boycotts of South Africa would have been unlawful. malthaussen Jun 2015 #3
Yep! n/t betterdemsonly Jun 2015 #12
Isn't Harper doing the same thing in Canada? malthaussen Jun 2015 #4
Yes. Jefferson23 Jun 2015 #6
Harper is a fundamentalist and a christian zionists betterdemsonly Jun 2015 #14
I grew up in South Carolina CherokeeDem Jun 2015 #8
This seems to be a defensive, rear-guard action. nt geek tragedy Jun 2015 #9
The boycotts are completely ineffective and are not working at all nope not even a little alcibiades_mystery Jun 2015 #10
They might be trying to protect themselves from boycott betterdemsonly Jun 2015 #11
Republicans don't care about Israel one tiny bit SwankyXomb Jun 2015 #13
That's too cynical n2doc Jun 2015 #15
Not to mention the defense industry. Boeing used to be a Washington company in Scoop Jackson's time betterdemsonly Jun 2015 #16
No, I disagree. malthaussen Jun 2015 #17
"Too small to be a country, too large to be an insane asylum." KamaAina Jun 2015 #18

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
1. I thought the right wing was against government restrictions on business?
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 09:20 AM
Jun 2015

I guess some regulations are more important than others. Clean, safe environment, not so much. Protecting an apartheid state, yes.

malthaussen

(17,204 posts)
5. Unenforcible, surely.
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 09:35 AM
Jun 2015

But it provides SC with a club with which to beat anti-Israel protesters, which is the purpose of the exercise.

-- Mal

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
7. It is constitutional,
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 09:49 AM
Jun 2015

it's preventing public entities, (state govt.) from doing business with private companies that are boycotting Israel.
The state has every right to do so.

malthaussen

(17,204 posts)
3. So on this basis, I guess the boycotts of South Africa would have been unlawful.
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 09:31 AM
Jun 2015

And here I thought we'd already established that money is free speech. Damn, it is so hard to keep up these days.

-- Mal

malthaussen

(17,204 posts)
4. Isn't Harper doing the same thing in Canada?
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 09:33 AM
Jun 2015

Or wants to, anyway? Think I saw an article about that a couple of weeks ago.

-- Mal

 

betterdemsonly

(1,967 posts)
14. Harper is a fundamentalist and a christian zionists
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 10:56 AM
Jun 2015

He is a member of the Christian Missionary Aiiiance. It the Church of John Birch. It still amazes me Canada elected him.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
10. The boycotts are completely ineffective and are not working at all nope not even a little
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 09:51 AM
Jun 2015

Carry on.

By the way, Illinois is doing something similar: requiring that state employee investment funds drop any boycotting entity from their portfolios. BECAUSE IT'S NOT WORKING AT ALL!!!!!!

 

betterdemsonly

(1,967 posts)
11. They might be trying to protect themselves from boycott
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 10:49 AM
Jun 2015

both the gay rights movement, and choice movement, are talking about boycotting them. The civil rights movement itself was based on boycotts, so this is blatently unconstitutional. The liberal, on everything but Israel crowd, crticized Palestinians for using violence instead of following MLK and Gandhi's example. Then when they do follow their example, and start boycotting Israel, they cooperatate, with the children of the old Confederacy, to outlaw the tactics of MLK and Gandhi. MLK and Gandhi boycotted Southern Institutions. They didn't just protest.

 

betterdemsonly

(1,967 posts)
16. Not to mention the defense industry. Boeing used to be a Washington company in Scoop Jackson's time
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 11:06 AM
Jun 2015

Now it does most of its manufacturing in South Carolina. It's headquarters is in Illinois. These states are both passing anti-BDS laws.

malthaussen

(17,204 posts)
17. No, I disagree.
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 12:27 PM
Jun 2015

Israel serves useful functions in the Mideast as a focus for resentment, a destabilizing influence, and a catspaw. They were also useful in the past for proxy wars, but it looks like we've abandoned that strategy. Still, we keep sending them toys, although their armaments industry is quite good at what it does.

-- Mal

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
18. "Too small to be a country, too large to be an insane asylum."
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 12:44 PM
Jun 2015

-unknown 19th-century South Carolinian

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»South Carolina becomes fi...