General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAmerican jobs for American workers?
Controversial, Racist, meaningless and a slogan normally associated with the Right.
Whats your view?
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)and divert attention from that fact by pitting immigrants against native-born.
As for racism, I think the fact that black Americans have a 13% unemployment rate is pretty racist.
Sea-Dog
(247 posts)but I reckon you've got to dress up racist slogans somehow
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)the issues that affect them. Nope, Americans can't talk about immigration policy, h1b visas, whether supposed labor shortages are real or not -- because it means they're racist. Cool how well that works for the union-busters and wage-cutters.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Foreign workers who send their paychecks "home" aren't. What you really mean is "pitting foreign workers and illegals against the native born and naturalized citizens"... and I'm okay with that.
Fewer foreign workers means more jobs for ethnic minority americans.
rucky
(35,211 posts)it seems like a worthy objective. Create more businesses and hire more people. Pretty non-controversial to me.
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)They say it, meaning something entirely different thus attempting and some times achieving in deception of the American people, namely the voter.
But then everything the right says or does is deceptive. Never take anything from the right for what it looks like it says.
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)because to me that is the inverse
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)racist.
So now you can't argue against h1b visas and the war against labor without being called a racist.
Sea-Dog
(247 posts)HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)Zalatix
(8,994 posts)Walk the walk, Sea-Dog. You having an American job is racist and anti-foreigner.
Trillo
(9,154 posts)Sea-Dog
(247 posts)I changed American with british and it is the slogan used by the nf and bnp.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)"American workers" including african americans, native americans and hispanic americans.
We taxpayers educate the children of foreign countries to take our jobs and send the proceeds home. It is stupid, unless you personally profit from cheap labor or selling education to the highest bidder.
Sea-Dog
(247 posts)I wouldn't hear about Americans taking your jobs would i?
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)legislators and business types promoting union-busting and wage-cutting policies like historically high immigration levels and h1b and similar visas that allow capital to hire cheap foreign labor and fuck them *and* american workers with a big stick.
See, that's the difference between the right and the left. The right doesn't like having foreigners in the country. The left doesn't like cheap-labor policies, and their concerns over such policies include the royal screwing the cheap labor gets.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)Every job we get is a blow to the third world, in your worldview.
Rochester
(838 posts)Protect our jobs!
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)RZM
(8,556 posts)As are your responses in the thread.
It seems that you are trying to draw out DUers who strongly support American workers so you can insinuate that doing so is racist, while also attempting to get statements on the record from the other side arguing that foreign born workers (including the undocumented) are as deserving of jobs as native-born workers are.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)"Are American workers just as deserving of foreign jobs as natives there are?"
(Specifically this refers to the fact that you have a better chance of being struck dead by a car than being allowed INTO a foreign country to work a job there.)
RZM
(8,556 posts)Sometimes politics and social issues can produce some strange interest alignments. While their reasons are different, pro-immigration folks can often find more in common with 1 percenters than with the average American worker.
white_wolf
(6,238 posts)It forces people in poor nations to work for virtually nothing. It is basically slavery. The U.S. should pass laws that require any trade agreements mandate that the companies involved pay the workers in foreign countries the at least a U.S. minimum wage or face heavy tariffs. As to the slogan you mentioned, it has a nasty history often associated with the far-right.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)It's not about people being from other countries, it is that companies exploit the guest workers. If they were required to bring pay up to parity with domestic wages, this would change things considerably.
Sea-Dog
(247 posts)ingac70
(7,947 posts)everyone else on the planet can kiss my ass.
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)The bosses and owners like it when native born workers fear immigrants and see them as the enemy.
Reality is it would be much better for US-born workers to join forces with Mexican-born workers to demand a better deal for all of us.
Not only Mexicans but the same is true for exmaple for US high tech workers and workers in India, who work over the Internet so they don't even need H1-Bs for that, in some cases.
Debates about H1-B's and immigration controls are legitimate. But in my opinion that is not going to end well if we base our struggle as US-born workers around the issue of keeping foreigners out.
Money is always going to go where wages are cheap. If we build a giant electric fence to keep Mexicans out, it's just going to increase the misery. It's not going to keep them out if they are determined to come.
Instead we ought to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the Mexican-born workers, or workers in India, and demand a better deal for all of us. As a side benefit, we'll feel much better about ourselves than we would if we used our energy vocally complaining about foreigners all the time.
Just my 2 cents.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)I used to work in a call center with a woman who had a typical South Asian accent. She was born a US citizen, but she grew up in Indonesia, India and Thailand. Often, she'd get some blockhead on the line who didn't want to talk to her, who wanted an "American" rep instead. Had nothing to do with where she was or how she did her job. It was only because they perceived her as foreign - as if an American can only come in one or two flavors.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)The Corporatists have done this for years, framing opposition to Globalist Corporatism as xenophobic and racist in order to scare the Cultural Left into supporting "Free Trade" BS.
WinniSkipper
(363 posts)The right's not talking about the 85K (or so) annual applications for H1Bs. They are talking about undocumented workers, here in America (American Jobs). They are not talking offshoring or manufacturing moving to other places.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)Hubert Flottz
(37,726 posts)I guess "Latter Day Saints" don't believe in that statement . Mitt will export your job, torture your hound and steal Granny's social security. And that's just on the first day.
Mitt is what we'd call a SCAB at work. He'd be a worse disaster than Bush.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)jp11
(2,104 posts)not all of them can work for another country or foreign company.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)It is not a slogan I hear in the US, and certainly not from the right. They don't talk about jobs at all. Also, Americans are of literally all races so the slogan would have to be called nationalist if anything. The US and British situations are not similar enough to apply the same thinking in each place.
...mhh ok....