General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTed Cruz: "five unelected judges..."
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articleiii"Article III
Section 1.
The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office."
So, Senator Cruz, aren't you a strict Constitutionalist?
spanone
(135,858 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)no_hypocrisy
(46,158 posts)CTyankee
(63,912 posts)But Harvard admitted that idiot...
PCIntern
(25,575 posts)who are actually referred to as "Justices"....but what do I know?
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)meaning of that bizarre condemnation by Cruz...
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)Considering the obnoxious "law and order" ads for some state judges that we have now, it would be a nightmare.......here in
Texas we have judges that aren't even lawyers.
TxVietVet
(1,905 posts)I'm on Cruz's mailing list. He is one ignorant asshole. The propaganda he puts out proves it. If you aren't keeping up on current events, Cruz is worse than Faux News.
PCIntern
(25,575 posts)and are the laughing-stock of the entire legal community.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Other Repug. candidates are using the same phrases.
One buzzword is "unelected judges"
Jindal said, yesterday...."we need to get rid of the Court".
Rick Santorum: Today, 5 unelected judges redefined the foundational unit of society. Now it is the people's turn to speak.
Mike Huckabee: "This flawed, failed decision is an out-of-control act of unconstitutional judicial tyranny"
plus this gem: I will not acquiesce to an imperial court any more than our Founders acquiesced to an imperial British monarch,"
"Activist court" is another buzzword..Fiorna used that, but who listens to her?
There is a push for Constitutional Amendment (s).
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)I recall it didn't turn out very well for the folks like Cruz and Huckabee.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)knuckledraggers hardly describes them. I like the term Cretin.
malaise
(269,157 posts)in another 5-4 decision
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,810 posts)appointed GWB president (Bush v. Gore), or decided corporations were people (Citizens United), or that women couldn't sue Walmart for discrimination in a class action (Walmart v. Dukes), or that corporations have religious rights (Hobby Lobby). Funny how they are complaining about those "unelected judges" now that they didn't get a 5-4 decision in their favor.
emulatorloo
(44,169 posts)Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)The tyranny of the majority and ensuring that our Constitution is honored for everyone. It is a bedrock of our democracy.
Sparkly
(24,149 posts)"Five unelected judges and four um, other judges walk into a bar..."
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)emulatorloo
(44,169 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)While they were rendering the Hobby Lobby decision, and the free speech ruling that made Citizens United an freaking democratic nightmare.
I just wish his would shut his freaking hypocrital gob.
Cha
(297,503 posts)has a camera on him.
Initech
(100,098 posts)Poiuyt
(18,129 posts)Walker, Santorum, and Rubio all used the same phrase.
They are nothing if not unimaginative idiots.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)TeddyR
(2,493 posts)And I don't believe he has ever had a good idea and this is one of his worst. The Supreme Court can be politicized enough without having the justices running blatantly partisan campaigns.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)He's without principles. It's incredible to me that Texas made him a Senator.
Bobcat
(246 posts)Yes they are "unelected" - and for good reason. The SCOTUS is tasked with upholding the Constitution and interpreting the law. Appointment - with Senate approval - allows them to carry out this important task FREE FROM POLITICAL PRESSURE. The founders, in their wisdom, knew that this element of government should not be subject to the whims and whistles of politicians and the changing winds of national politics. The law means what Supreme Court says it means.