General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRulers
Comedians have often suggested that Ronald Reagans immense popularity might have been helped by television-induced confusion. But I would like to make the case that this was concretely true, and that its not so funny.
Because of his background, Reagan handled television as president with astonishing skill and power. He understood, as no one did before, that on television, style supersedes content. The way you behave and look is more important than what you say and do. He knew that complexity and historical perspective do not come across on TV as well as simplicity, bald assertion, the heavy use of symbolic content, and the appeal to formulaic values, deeply imbedded in Americans by previous decades of television and film. Good vs. Evil, America vs. The Enemy
..
-- Jerry Mander; In the Absence of the Sacred; Sierra Club Books; 1991; pages 90-91..
Does this sound strangely familiar? Perhaps remind you of a current republican candidate, who is doing unexpectedly well in the presidential primary contest? Someone who lacks substance, but is confusing the experts by his ability to surf the waves of hatred, fear, and frustration of their party, right to the top of the dung heap? To prove to be more than the flavor of the week fad candidate of the early 2012 republican contest?
Republicans today are as oblivious to who Ronald Reagan was, as they were in 1980 and 84, when they believed that he was red, white, and blue, apple pie, and the bible incarnate. The man who used symbols to his advantage has become the very symbol of all he never was. This is sadly proven by something as obvious as the republican inability to process the facts of the Iran-Contra scandals, while attacking President Obama for arming Iran -- the absolute opposite of reality. As the old saying goes, you cant make this shit up.
In order to dull the publics senses to the point of making them accept the unacceptable, to look forward to an evening of mistaking having their being be yanked out of them as entertainment, they must be doused with a pain-killer
..a social Novocain to dull their senses, especially common sense. To accept the non-reality of Reality TV. Donald Trumps status as the leading republican contender is solid evidence that this is the case for a significant segment of the republican party.
Did you know we are ruled by TV, Jim Morrison asked in his American Prayer? The drunken artist had experimented with collective behavior, before finding that crowds rarely could be controlled once they reached a certain point. Rather, the unconscious crowd becomes the monster that C. G. Jung warned of, vulnerable to supporting an image of a leader that exists only in the darkest recesses of their minds. Now its a monster, and will not obey, as Steppenwolf sang.
I think its fair to say that Trump entered the contest, with the goal of knee-capping Jeb Bush. It seems likely that he did so, believing that this would be helpful to the person he assumed would be the Democratic nominee. However, his campaign has created an energy that surprised even him, and he has come to believe that he can actually become president. Or, of course, it is entirely possible that he entered the contest fully intent upon winning. Thats a distinction that really isnt important right now.
What is important is that an ugly force is gaining strength in America, and while the Trump phenomenon is its visible surface, it has a momentum beneath the surface that poses a serious danger. The world stage is very different today, Whereas President Reagan could satisfy the public with his 1983 invasion of Grenada -- an event that only the most cowardly could justify, much less pretend was a noble exercise of American power -- the tensions between the US and the rest of the world make such cowboy diplomacy much riskier now.
I do not delude myself into thinking that I know The Answer. It might be easier to believe that backing a single candidate offered security. Or perhaps a lobotomy? But neither are satisfactory alternatives.
But I do know that everything is connected -- that truly, every person plays a role in what direction our society will move in. Obviously, voting is important. Yet, it goes way beyond that. As individuals, we need to be consciously aware of our everyday actions, and make every effort to not feed that monster, that growing collective force of anger and hostility that is saturating our culture. That may sound trite, I know. But I much prefer being part of a Peace Movement, than of an Anti-War Movement.
Peace,
H2O Man
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)and it really scared the crap out of me because it showed how it really could happen here. It's fiction, and it's a stretch, but it was written long before TV and Nixon's beard problem, to say nothing about Reagan and Trump.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It_Can%27t_Happen_Here
H2O Man
(74,797 posts)Interesting, food for thought. Thank you.
mmonk
(52,589 posts)And I still like Jerry's name.
his parents thinking? You know?
annabanana
(52,791 posts)H2O Man
(74,797 posts)Trump as an individual person is perhaps amusing, and the troubles he is causing the republican party may be entertaining. The amount of oxygen he sucks out of the media coverage of the primary contests is annoying. But what is actually happening before our eyes is no joke.
malaise
(275,369 posts)Thanks WaterMan
H2O Man
(74,797 posts)H2O Man
(74,797 posts)is primarily Trump, I feel justified in kicking this.
mrdmk
(2,943 posts)I read the newspapers instead. It keeps me from breaking a lot of T.V. sets...
You and I have had conversations in the past about Trump. His public speaking is an exercise in propaganda 101, give the audience fifty percent truth and fill the rest with crap. Trump's election bid is not doing this country and by extension the world any good. Maybe he is having too much fun with his campaign. It will not be much fun for Trump when the media turns him.
What you say about Reagan is true. The television made him. At the same time, there were many in print who torn Reagan to shreds. The only thing that save Reagan's image was he only had eight years in office. One hundred thirty-eight convicted administration officials, what does that say? One more year and the man himself would have been doing jail time if not for anything else, incompetence. Warren G. Harding cannot hold a candle to Reagan, considering that Reagan's name was and still is being put on buildings, bridges, hospitals, airports, etc., to this day he is being held up like some sort of saint.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reagan_administration_scandals
http://xroads.virginia.edu/~HYPER/ALLEN/ch6.html
Peace and Love, Keep up the good work H2O Man
H2O Man
(74,797 posts)point: the "Ronald Reagan" of television was distinct from the one in print. Those who think in the context of the "reel" world believed he was as heroic as a flag; while those capable of reading knew he was fronting for the most criminal gang to ever occupy the White House. And that he was a petty, mean-spirited, lying carp.