Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 11:39 AM Sep 2015

How Obama Out-Muscled Aipac

Nothing sweeter than aIpac tears . . .

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-09-17/how-obama-out-muscled-aipac

Senator Richard Durbin is on a long list of Democrats who have dismayed the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. The same Richard Durbin who owes his political career to Aipac. In 1982, Aipac members supported Durbin, then an obscure college professor, against Paul Findley’s campaign for reelection to the House as retribution for Findley’s outspoken advocacy on behalf of the Palestine Liberation Organization. In 2015, Durbin not only supported the president’s Iran agreement against Aipac’s wishes, he also helped organize his fellow Democrats to defend it. “He has been a great disappointment to the pro-Israel community,” says Morris Amitay, a former executive director of Aipac.

Other disappointments include Steny Hoyer of Maryland, the House minority whip, who led this year’s Aipac-funded trip of House Democratic freshmen to Israel; and New Jersey Senator Cory Booker, who was an early sponsor of Iran sanctions legislation when he got to Congress. Earlier in the summer, Aipac’s leaders believed it was possible to win the support of red state Democratic senators such as Montana’s Jon Tester, Missouri’s Claire McCaskill, and North Dakota’s Heidi Heitkamp. (Republicans didn’t need to be persuaded to vote against Obama.) In the end, all of those Democrats supported the Iran agreement, and even helped block a vote on a resolution in the Senate to formally disapprove it.

These kinds of defeats aren’t supposed to happen to Aipac. Over the past 30 years, the organization has grown into the most powerful foreign policy lobby in Washington. Its fundraising prowess is fearsome. In a 2013 filing with the IRS, Aipac and a sister organization—the group that funds trips to Israel for members of Congress—recorded more than $70 million in contributions. Aipac also raised $30 million for a group that ran anti-deal television, radio, and Internet ads throughout the country this summer. Its initiatives, particularly on Iran sanctions, passed Congress with bipartisan, near unanimity in 2010 and 2012, over initial White House objections. It’s had success in securing military aid for Israel. On this, Obama has done more than his predecessors, financing the development of Israel’s Iron Dome rocket defense system on top of the annual $3 billion U.S. subsidy to the country.

Obama, however, is also one of the reasons Aipac couldn’t stop the Iran deal: Democrats feared the president more than they feared the pro-Israel lobby. “Aipac went to the Democrats and said, ‘We need your help as a friend.’ Obama said, ‘If you cross me you are going to make an enemy of my machine forever,’?” says South Carolina Republican Senator Lindsey Graham. “It’s one thing to lose an old friend, it’s sad. But you think twice before you make a new enemy.”

...

The pro-deal lobbyists were more vocal and much more explicit in turning this into a loyalty-to-Obama issue. While the White House didn’t make threats directly, a litany of groups did. Senators Chuck Schumer of New York and Robert Menendez of New Jersey, two Democrats who oppose the deal, were featured on a truck-mounted billboard in New York City sponsored by MoveOn.org calling them “Most Likely to Start a War.” A pro-deal group known as Credo-Action derided Schumer as “warmonger Chuck” and called for blocking his path to becoming the party’s leader in the Senate upon the retirement of Harry Reid. As the Wall Street Journal reported, the White House in 2014 teamed up with the Ploughshares Fund—an antiwar foundation that spent more than $7 million in the last four years fighting anti-deal groups—to make the case for an Iran agreement.


Crooked Bob Menendez has a big sad in numerous places inside the article. Screw him.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How Obama Out-Muscled Aipac (Original Post) geek tragedy Sep 2015 OP
No one combines the art and science of campaigning like Barack Obama BeyondGeography Sep 2015 #1
Thanks. Scurrilous Sep 2015 #2
"a loyalty-to-Obama issue" Martin Eden Sep 2015 #3
Israel has been coddled for too long. PM Martin Sep 2015 #4
I see it as a "loyalty to world peace" issue. Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2015 #6
That's even better Martin Eden Sep 2015 #8
Big Tobacco was once considered to be the most powerful lobby in Washington..... Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2015 #5
So AIPAC haz a sad... hifiguy Sep 2015 #7
It's such a loss of perspective Hydra Sep 2015 #9

Martin Eden

(12,870 posts)
3. "a loyalty-to-Obama issue"
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 01:23 PM
Sep 2015

I see it as a loyalty to America issue.

This nuclear deal is very much in our national interests, whereas Israeli hardliners want to suck us into a very costly war with Iran.

These lobbyists are putting the agenda of a foreign country above the interests of the United States.

And the entire Republican Party caters to their dictates.

PM Martin

(2,660 posts)
4. Israel has been coddled for too long.
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 02:16 PM
Sep 2015

Iran aquired 5000 centrifuges under Bush's tenure. There was no mechanism to stop them from aquiring more and developing and refining the fuel. Now there is an agreement. If Bibi wants a war, he needs to be on his own.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
5. Big Tobacco was once considered to be the most powerful lobby in Washington.....
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 03:24 PM
Sep 2015

We didn't think they could ever be defeated.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
9. It's such a loss of perspective
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 08:17 PM
Sep 2015

Israel and AIPAC got used to always having it their way, and pushed too hard at Obama's Administration. Even so, they'll come out with a ton of placating gifts.

The real issue is that they seem to think it's their divine right to wreck the world, and we need to help them. They need an intervention.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How Obama Out-Muscled Aip...