General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJFK
Finally, it should be clear by now that a nation can be no stronger abroad than she is at home. Only an America which practices what it preaches about equal rights and social justice will be respected by those whose choice affects our future. Only an America which has fully educated its citizens is fully capable of tackling the complex problems and perceiving the hidden dangers of the world in which we live. And only an America which is growing and prospering economically can sustain the worldwide defenses of freedom, while demonstrating to all concerned the opportunities of our system and society.
The above quote is from the speech that President John F. Kennedy planned to deliver in Dallas, on this day in 1963. The full speech is available by simply googling: on the internet It is definitely worth reading.
In the decades since JFKs death, there have been attempts to discredit him for a variety of reasons. By no coincidence whatsoever, the vast majority of these complaints sound indistinguishable from Richard Nixons petty resentments. Certainly, JFK was human, and was thus imperfect.
Others focus on his policies -- for example, relating to Vietnam -- and his administrations legislative record. These are obviously important issues, and the source of meaningful study and discussion. Yet, it is important to do so in the context of a presidency that was unfinished, and within the social-political reality of the day. Again, the vast majority of his detractors sound rather republican -- especially when on the internet, they pretend to be otherwise.
These people lack the capacity to recognize those traits that real Democrats and members of the Democratic Left value
..including, of course, about JFK.
Peace,
H2O Man
Rex
(65,616 posts)They didn't care about conflict of interest then and they don't care about it now.
jaysunb
(11,856 posts)But, he should have waited until he had been tried and convicted.
Rex
(65,616 posts)I do think that Nixon's legal team could likely have partially frustrated the prosecution by making an issue "national security" .....by attempting to claim the ex-president needed to bring all types of state secrets to the table, in order to defend himself. However, the recent book of transcripts of White House tapes (Douglas Brinkley's "The Nixon Tapes: 1`973) shows that Nixon was paranoid that his use of the infamous "Huston Plan" was grounds for impeachment and conviction. It wouldn't have been exactly for Watergate -- but it was actually much larger.
That the issues involving the Huston Plan were never really addressed, we ended up with an updated version of it, known as The Patriot Act."
voteearlyvoteoften
(1,716 posts)Right now more than ever.
H2O Man
(74,696 posts)My pleasure. I'm glad that you like the quote, and appreciate how timely it is.
Thank you!
femmedem
(8,345 posts)H2O Man
(74,696 posts)I really appreciate your kind words.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)H2O Man
(74,696 posts)old friend John? Can you tell me where he's gone? He freed lotta people but it seems the good they die young. I just looked around and he's gone."
-- Dion
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)democracy died. By the order of Allen Dulles.
cpwm17
(3,829 posts)Assassin with murder weapon
It's not nice to absolve an assassin of a terrible crime or to falsely accuse another of murder, even if the falsely accused is a horrible person.
H2O Man
(74,696 posts)for your interest and participation on this OP/thread. Since discussing JFK's death isn't allowed on DU:GD, I'd appreciate if that could be avoided here. The OP is meaningful -- at least to some of the DU community -- and the OP's quote from the President's planned speech is worthy of discussion.
cpwm17
(3,829 posts)Someone else was pushing nonsense.
H2O Man
(74,696 posts)Hence, I made the same polite, sincere request of each of the three friends here who had discussed that.
villager
(26,001 posts)http://www.democracynow.org/2015/10/19/a_cia_tie_to_jfk_assassination
Response to hifiguy (Reply #10)
dflprincess This message was self-deleted by its author.
H2O Man
(74,696 posts)Since discussions of JFK's death are not allowed on DU:GD, I'd appreciate it if it wasn't added to this OP/thread. Thanks!
H2O Man
(74,696 posts)It is the anniversary.
As interesting as some conversations might be, DU:GD does not allow for discussing the reasons JFK was killed. I would really appreciate it if it wasn't brought up on an OP/thread I start.I think we can honor JFK, and more importantly, communicate his message today.
mountain grammy
(26,987 posts)H2O Man
(74,696 posts)There are some things that one can't fully "learn" without the experience. Thus, while there are great books and documentaries on the decade of the Sixties -- definitely including President Kennedy -- I like to compare them to my own memories of that bygone era.
Thanks!
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)but my parents loved him and they like President Obama too. People I admire and respect speak highly of him. His brother Bobby too. And Ted, it's been said by people with wisdom, probably did as much in the Senate for the poor and disadvantaged as anyone in its history.
Thanks for the excellent post.
H2O Man
(74,696 posts)My children are convinced that I'm old enough to remember the day President Lincoln was first elected.
I consider myself a "Kennedy Democratic," primarily, in terms of organized politics. While the 1960 campaign did make use of much of the party's leaders and upper-structures, RFK invested in people at the grass roots level, too. The combination of RFK's organizational skills then, in his Senate campaign in '64, and his presidential run in '68, should be studied by liberal and progressive activists here.
Teddy certainly ranks high among this nation's greatest Senators.
ms liberty
(9,463 posts)So many democrats today espouse views that are the antithesis of JFK, RFK, FDR; and they seem so proud of it. Amazing how often it can be seen right here on DU. I may have to start putting people on ignore; "letting it sink" only goes so far, lol!
H2O Man
(74,696 posts)This is pure speculation on my part, but I think that if the RFK of 1968 were alive today, he would be running for president, because he would feel obligated, due to the crises this nation faces. And no doubt, some of our friends here would view him as a wild-eyed mad man, and damaging to the Democratic Party. And, heck, can you imagine how the media would treat him?
I've never used the "ignore" option, formally, but there are a few individuals who I have no interest in communicating with. And I appreciate your "let it sink" comment; strange how that's changed.
It's always a pleasure to talk with you! Thanks!
ucrdem
(15,700 posts)and repeatedly warned against getting drawn into a quagmire in Indochina (Vietnam). The Vietnam war is not JFK's legacy though many would like us to believe otherwise. It is LBJ's and it made his friends at Brown and Root, aka KBR, rich. Here's JFK on Latin American revolutionary movements, specifically Cuba's:
Just as we must recall our own revolutionary past in order to understand the spirit and the significance of the anti-colonial uprisings in Asia and Africa, we should now reread the life of Simón Bolívar, the great "Liberator" ... of South America, in order to comprehend the new contagion for liberty and reform now spreading south of our borders. (Strategy of Peace, p. 167)
This is not cold warrior or a moderate speaking; these are the words of a Massachusetts liberal.
H2O Man
(74,696 posts)I agree with you completely. And I admire your skills in communicating. Well done, and thank you!
ucrdem
(15,700 posts)Even among good people who take politics seriously, very few are aware of how VP Johnson -- a politician who had a limited background in international issues -- was frequently updated on Vietnam by sources within the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Its not that other vice presidents never received intelligence reports: Nixon, for example, was not only updated, but was influential in these matters in South and Central America. But he was big on international policy, with far less interest in domestic issues -- the opposite of LBJ. More importantly, President Kennedy and most of his administration were unaware that LBJ was getting such updates.
ucrdem
(15,700 posts)Yes that is disturbing. I want to like LBJ, and I do like his support for Kennedy's anti-poverty and civil rights initiatives, but Vietnam was a catastrophe that had no business happening. David Talbot in Brothers all but lays blame for Nov. 22 at LBJ's feet, along with a few others including Allen Dulles. But for the record he doesn't actually claim that any individual is guilty at least in Brothers.
mountain grammy
(26,987 posts)Why was that?
CanSocDem
(3,286 posts)...and a suitable replacement was being groomed. I'm surprised they waited 4 days before they reversed JFK's policy.
.
Mopar151
(10,130 posts)Is the # of Republicans in particular, and politicans in general, willing to spill blood and waste treasure over these "petty resentments".
We are in a dark time, and virtually every republican candidate for president is advocating the taking of a deep plunge into a darker place.
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)I admired him tremendously, and I have never stopped. It was a great loss, and I still remember my grief. Same with RFK. We haven't seen anything like them since, and we so desperately need their like now.
H2O Man
(74,696 posts)My extended family worked hard for JFK's election. He was the first politician that I ever knew or cared about.
Hekate
(93,385 posts)Do some people here just flat-out hate Democrats, all Democrats? Nothing, and I mean nothing, is ever good enough for them. I must be missing something -- I have never asked for, nor expected, my heroes to be plaster saints.
I was 16 when JFK's life was cut short, certainly old enough to remember the Cuban Missile Crisis, the Berlin Wall going up, the battle for integration, and so much more.
And on this the anniversary of his assassination, there are people on this site doing the dirty business of Nixon's and Rove's Right Wing.
I don't get it.
H2O Man
(74,696 posts)that you do "get it" -- the proof being this: "there are people on this site doing the dirty business of Nixon and Rove's Right Wing."
It really is that simple. One can debate if they do so purposely, or are simply parrots chattering that which they do not understand. But, neither of these options makes for meaningful contributions to a democratic discussion forum.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)JFK remains my favorite US President of my lifetime.
Sensitive soul
(71 posts)As usual!
G_j
(40,413 posts)well done