Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
5. I suppose the only real counterargument is taking out Hitler
Wed Dec 30, 2015, 12:15 PM
Dec 2015

Which didn't lead to something worse; what did we do differently in that case? Or were conditions just unique in Germany at that period, and unlikely to be repeated.

Bryant

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
6. Historical note: the USSR 'took out' Hitler (or his remains). Technically speaking, Hitler took
Wed Dec 30, 2015, 12:18 PM
Dec 2015

himself out.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
7. Fair enough; is you argument that the Soviet Union was a brake on US plans for Germany?
Wed Dec 30, 2015, 12:21 PM
Dec 2015

My impression has been the opposite - the Soviet Union wanted to deal much more harshly with Germany than we eventually did.

Bryant

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
8. Nah, I was just being a pedantic jerk. Personally, I think Versailles 1918 didn't
Wed Dec 30, 2015, 12:23 PM
Dec 2015

go far enough, although I recognize that most see that opinion as heterodox.

As for 1945, the USSR lost some 25 million, the U.S. a mere 250,000. That disparity would tend to breed some comparatively hard feelings, I'd think.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We reap what we sow.....