Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UCmeNdc

(9,600 posts)
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 03:56 PM Jan 2016

Harvard law professor: Ted Cruz’s eligibility to be president is ‘murky and unsettled’

The legal and constitutional issues around qualification for the presidency on grounds of US citizenship are “murky and unsettled”, according to the scholar cited by Donald Trump in his recent attacks on Ted Cruz .

Related: Ted Cruz insists he is a natural-born citizen after new Donald Trump attack

Trump has sought to cast doubt on whether the senator, who was born in Canada to an American mother and a Cuban father, is a “natural-born US citizen”. In doing so he has referred to the work and words of Laurence Tribe , perhaps the most respected liberal law professor in the country.

Tribe taught both Cruz and Barack Obama at Harvard Law School. He also advised Al Gore in the 2000 Florida recount and has advised Obama’s campaign organisation.

“Despite Sen[ator] Cruz’s repeated statements that the legal/constitutional issues around whether he’s a natural-born citizen are clear and settled,” he told the Guardian by email, “the truth is that they’re murky and unsettled.”

Tribe has said previously that the question of Cruz’s eligibility is “unsettled”. On Sunday, Trump cited that position in an interview with NBC’s Meet the Press, in which he described Tribe “as a constitutional expert, one of the true experts”.


http://www.rawstory.com/2016/01/harvard-law-professor-ted-cruzs-eligibility-to-be-president-is-murky-and-unsettled/

39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Harvard law professor: Ted Cruz’s eligibility to be president is ‘murky and unsettled’ (Original Post) UCmeNdc Jan 2016 OP
DU birthers? Buzz Clik Jan 2016 #1
I hope he is qualified, and is nominated. randys1 Jan 2016 #26
Karma's a bitch , TEDDY. bdwker Jan 2016 #2
I refuse to jump on any birther band wagon leftofcool Jan 2016 #3
Don't be too hasty. There's issues around TC's mother becoming a Canadian citizen. nt Xipe Totec Jan 2016 #4
Nope. jeff47 Jan 2016 #11
It's not about Canadian law, it's about US law Xipe Totec Jan 2016 #15
Well, there's a few million dual citizens that currently exist. jeff47 Jan 2016 #16
Not to mention the fact SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2016 #18
It isn't a "ban" TeddyR Jan 2016 #32
He's a natural born citizen. He was born a citizen, instead of naturalized some time after birth. jeff47 Jan 2016 #39
For a US citizen to forfeit citizenship requires an affirmative COLGATE4 Jan 2016 #21
US law allows dual citizenship in Canada. dixiegrrrrl Jan 2016 #25
You cannot "forfeit" your citizenship jberryhill Jan 2016 #30
The US also allows dual citizenship KamaAina Jan 2016 #33
I don't care if the accusations are true or not. backscatter712 Jan 2016 #14
the birthers are a-holes but if there are legit questions here, then yes its relevant. roguevalley Jan 2016 #5
Imagine how embarrassing this must be for his mother Orrex Jan 2016 #6
big smile SoLeftIAmRight Jan 2016 #8
I don't know why people are laughing about "birthers" now. It was silly RE Obama because TwilightGardener Jan 2016 #7
I think this will be an issue if Cruz is nominated LastLiberal in PalmSprings Jan 2016 #9
You should not assume birthers care about intellectual consistency. (nt) jeff47 Jan 2016 #13
First time I've ever seen "birthers" and "intellectual" in the same sentence. n/t LastLiberal in PalmSprings Jan 2016 #37
Because you don't have to be born in the US to be a US citizen. jeff47 Jan 2016 #12
You're taking all the fun away SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2016 #19
apparently Tribe isn't as convinced as you are - n/t RussBLib Jan 2016 #20
It's not a question about being a US citizen. It's an COLGATE4 Jan 2016 #22
All he's saying is there's no specific ruling yet on what "natural born citizen" means jeff47 Jan 2016 #23
"Natural Born" citizen. I keep forgetting the Natural Born part. Jim Beard Jan 2016 #27
It just means you were born a citizen, instead of naturalized. (nt) jeff47 Jan 2016 #38
Which is EXACTLY the point of the issue by Laurence Tribe. dixiegrrrrl Jan 2016 #29
The quibble is over the definition of "natural-born citizen" KamaAina Jan 2016 #34
They chased Obama relentlessly for years over this very same issue. pa28 Jan 2016 #10
I agree. This is payback and it's a bitch, and I for one don't want to miss one moment CTyankee Jan 2016 #17
I, for one, am happy to ram this birther issue down the GOP's throat if Cruz is the nom. nt TeamPooka Jan 2016 #24
The process is murky, but the result is not HassleCat Jan 2016 #28
Larry Tribe wrote the best treatise on Constitutional law Gothmog Jan 2016 #31
Cruz *is* exactly as "natural born" as birthers *accused* Obama of being. n/t lumberjack_jeff Jan 2016 #35
This enables anti-immigrant and anti-refugee rhetoric loyalsister Jan 2016 #36

Xipe Totec

(43,890 posts)
4. Don't be too hasty. There's issues around TC's mother becoming a Canadian citizen. nt
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 04:11 PM
Jan 2016

Which, if she did, by say voting on Canadian elections, would make TC an illegal immigrant and a Dreamer.

That would be just soo sweet!

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
11. Nope.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 05:35 PM
Jan 2016

Unless she formally renounced US citizenship, she's a US citizen. Canada allows dual citizenship, which would allow her to vote in Canadian elections without renouncing her US citizenship.

Xipe Totec

(43,890 posts)
15. It's not about Canadian law, it's about US law
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 06:00 PM
Jan 2016

And whether she forfeits US citizenship by accepting Canadian citizenship.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
16. Well, there's a few million dual citizens that currently exist.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 06:14 PM
Jan 2016

Which would kinda indicate the US is not enforcing such a ban, or that such a ban does not exist.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
18. Not to mention the fact
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 06:19 PM
Jan 2016

that the alleged voter registration was in 1974...four years after Ted Cruz was born.

 

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)
32. It isn't a "ban"
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 07:55 PM
Jan 2016

And the question isn't if he's a citizen but whether he's a "natural born citizen." The two aren't the same.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
39. He's a natural born citizen. He was born a citizen, instead of naturalized some time after birth.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 11:27 PM
Jan 2016

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
21. For a US citizen to forfeit citizenship requires an affirmative
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 06:25 PM
Jan 2016

renunciation of citizenship before US governmental authorities who may or may not grant it. There are thousands of americans who have dual citizenship with other countries and many actually vote in the other country's elections. None of that in any way affects their US citizenship.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
25. US law allows dual citizenship in Canada.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 06:44 PM
Jan 2016

U.S. and Canadian immigration laws allow you to become a citizen of both countries, simultaneously - assuming you qualify to immigrate from one country to the other.
http://www.alllaw.com/articles/nolo/us-immigration/dual-citizenship-united-states-canada.html

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
30. You cannot "forfeit" your citizenship
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 06:58 PM
Jan 2016

It's actually very hard to get the US to accept a revocation of citizenship, since people attempt it for tax reasons.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
33. The US also allows dual citizenship
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 09:06 PM
Jan 2016

but does not allow US citizens to even attempt to vote in foreign elections; this is grounds for revocation of citizenship.

Orrex

(63,219 posts)
6. Imagine how embarrassing this must be for his mother
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 04:26 PM
Jan 2016

Publicly outed as having spawned Ted Cruz of all things.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
7. I don't know why people are laughing about "birthers" now. It was silly RE Obama because
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 04:30 PM
Jan 2016

he was born in this country. But Ted Cruz...wasn't. And not because of a military assignment like McCain, either. Nope, his parents just wanted to live there and wanted to have their kid born there. Why shouldn't this be examined?

9. I think this will be an issue if Cruz is nominated
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 05:05 PM
Jan 2016

for president or vice president. It would have been a non-issue had the birthers not made such a big deal about Obama's birth.

Since the situation with Cruz is identical to Obama's alleged circumstances (which we know are false -- he was born in Hawaii, USA) the birthers and GOP are faced with making the opposite argument. To do so would mean they would have to retract their arguments against Obama, and if there's one thing we know about conservatives, it's that they never apologize.

As Cruz becomes a bigger threat to Trump we can expect Carrot Top to raise this issue over and over again.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
12. Because you don't have to be born in the US to be a US citizen.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 05:38 PM
Jan 2016

If either of your parents was a US citizen, you're a US citizen no matter where you were born.

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
22. It's not a question about being a US citizen. It's an
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 06:28 PM
Jan 2016

arcane question about what constitutes a "natural born citizen". You can obviously be a US citizen without being a natural born US citizen (which is what the Constitution requires of a US President).

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
23. All he's saying is there's no specific ruling yet on what "natural born citizen" means
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 06:28 PM
Jan 2016

when it comes to the constitutional qualifications for President. But throwing out "natural born" people who were not actually located within the US when they were born makes no legal sense, so it's EXTREMELY unlikely that this would happen.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
29. Which is EXACTLY the point of the issue by Laurence Tribe.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 06:54 PM
Jan 2016

Tribe is pointing out that Cruz's own beliefs would make him ineligible:



under “the kind of judge Cruz says he admires and would appoint to the supreme court – an ‘originalist’ who claims to be bound by the historical meaning of the constitution’s terms at the time of their adoption – Cruz wouldn’t be eligible because the legal principles that prevailed in the 1780s and 90s required that someone be born on US soil to be a ‘natural born’ citizen.”

Tribe added: “Even having two US parents wouldn’t suffice for a genuine originalist. And having just an American mother, as Cruz did, would clearly have been insufficient at a time that made patrilineal descent decisive.

“On the other hand, to the kind of judge that I admire and Cruz abhors – a ‘living constitutionalist’ who believes that the constitution’s meaning evolves with the needs of the time – Cruz would ironically be eligible because it no longer makes sense to be bound by so narrow and strict a definition.”


this is really a delicious catch 22 that Tribe has pointed out, and I hope it gets a lot of publicity....
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
34. The quibble is over the definition of "natural-born citizen"
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 09:08 PM
Jan 2016

If it means a citizen from birth, as opposed to naturalized, Carnival Cruz is in.

pa28

(6,145 posts)
10. They chased Obama relentlessly for years over this very same issue.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 05:06 PM
Jan 2016

Why not let them spend some time reconciling their own hypocrisy instead of giving them a free pass?

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
17. I agree. This is payback and it's a bitch, and I for one don't want to miss one moment
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 06:19 PM
Jan 2016

of it...

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
28. The process is murky, but the result is not
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 06:54 PM
Jan 2016

The reason Cruz seems to be hiding something is because he is. It's clear he eligible to claim natural born US citizenship, but how he did it is not so clear. It looks to me like his parents failed to submit the required paperwork, and Cruz somehow "magically" got his US passport. Normally, it would require filing a report of a child born to a US citizen while living abroad, and that seems to be missing. There is some suggestion that Cruz's parents skirted or bypassed the usual process, but that is not Cruz's fault, and it doesn't change the facts of his birth. He was born in Canada to a US citizen, making him eligible to be president. I suppose his parents could be criticized, maybe even punished, for whatever they did or failed to do, and it might be grounds for his Republican opponents to manufacture a scandal, which they do so well, but we know he's eligible when all is said and done.

Gothmog

(145,462 posts)
31. Larry Tribe wrote the best treatise on Constitutional law
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 07:03 PM
Jan 2016

I have seen a legal analysis that indicates that it is more likely than not that Carnival Cruz is eligible which analysis is consistent with Tribe's views

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
36. This enables anti-immigrant and anti-refugee rhetoric
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 09:38 PM
Jan 2016

Democrats jumping on this bandwagon is Trumps dream as it validates his claim that it is an inherently bad thing to not be a citizen.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Harvard law professor: Te...