Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jpak

(41,758 posts)
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 03:16 PM Jan 2016

The Private Sector Is Now Providing Basic Services to Flint

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/01/flint-water-crisis-walmart/427062/

A coalition of some of America’s biggest companies is organizing a trucklift for Flint, promising to deliver 6.5 million bottles of water to the city in order to provide clean drinking water for schoolchildren through 2016. Walmart, Coca-Cola, Nestlé, and PepsiCo say they will deliver 6.5 million bottles to Flint, enough for the city’s 10,000 students.

In October, testing found toxic levels of lead in the water at Flint’s schools. The whole city is grappling with the malign effects of a switch from water provided by the Detroit system to water from the Flint River, which helped corrode the city’s pipes and leach lead into drinking water—in addition to turning the water a putrid brown. The state and federal governments have both declared states of emergency.

That these firms are stepping up to deliver water is good news for Flint’s schools and citizens in the immediate term. But a one-time infusion of gallons of fresh water doesn’t do much to address the systemic failures of government that led to the water crisis in the first place. By making four for-profit corporations into a de facto public utility, the gift might actually risk making things worse in the long run.

The corporate giants aren’t the first to donate water. Everyone from churches to presidential campaigns to, uh, Marky Mark and Diddy have chipped in bottles. The state of Michigan has also begun to provide bottled water, as well as filters. Meanwhile, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette is blasting the city for continuing to charge residents for the water they use, even though they can’t safely drink it. In 2014, the average monthly bill was $140 a month.

<more>

ALEC and Koch Bros. for the win....

yup
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Private Sector Is Now Providing Basic Services to Flint (Original Post) jpak Jan 2016 OP
Shock Doctrine. Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #1
The fascist corporatocracy at work. Hillary will be very pleased. Kip Humphrey Jan 2016 #2
Mission accomplished! Mika Jan 2016 #3
Exactly. nt 2naSalit Jan 2016 #4
At least they'll get clean water SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2016 #5
That is what we the people have in FEMA (or, that's what we're supposed to have). Mika Jan 2016 #6
From what I've read SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2016 #7
I don't think anyone is saying they should go without. Mika Jan 2016 #8
Republicans aren't running FEMA n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2016 #9
Pretty sure the governor has to request FEMA. Mika Jan 2016 #11
I linked to an article further down the thread re: FEMA n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2016 #13
Got it. Thanks. Mika Jan 2016 #14
Looks like FEMA is doing limited assistance SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2016 #10
OK. Thanks for the info. Mika Jan 2016 #12
FEMA 1939 Jan 2016 #15
Glad they are getting water for now, but it's still disturbing. Bradical79 Jan 2016 #16

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
5. At least they'll get clean water
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 04:16 PM
Jan 2016

Sorry, I don't see anything wrong with this.

Of course the systemic failures that caused this issue in the first place need to be addressed and fixed, but in the meantime, these people need clean water. I see no problem with private companies providing it.

 

Mika

(17,751 posts)
6. That is what we the people have in FEMA (or, that's what we're supposed to have).
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 04:46 PM
Jan 2016

The repukes have taken down yet another city with their destructive policies.

Just where the f*ck is FEMA?



SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
7. From what I've read
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 04:49 PM
Jan 2016

FEMA declined to assist - not sure if that is true or not.

But whatever reason they aren't there, they aren't there, and the people need clean water.

Isn't it better that companies provide it than they do without?

 

Mika

(17,751 posts)
8. I don't think anyone is saying they should go without.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 05:02 PM
Jan 2016

It's the "for whatever reason they aren't there" that is VERY bothersome.

Republicans ... destroying America one day, one city, one social safety net at a time.



1939

(1,683 posts)
15. FEMA
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 05:12 PM
Jan 2016

The only assets that FEMA has are bureaucrats. When an emergency occurs, the clerks and jerks in FEMA are given mountains of US government money. FEMA uses the money to hire contractors to do any work that must be done.

 

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)
16. Glad they are getting water for now, but it's still disturbing.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 05:23 PM
Jan 2016

The problem is what having to rely on water from these companies means. It's not so much "wrong" as it is disturbing.

Why has the government failed at every level to adequately help the people of Flint? That's something that needs answered and fixed. And a city having to rely on donations from largely uncaring private corporations is not a good situation. Corporations like Nestlé aren't exactly in the habit of doing things just out of kindness. They rely on child slave labor while bottling water taken from a region that has its own water shortage problem.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Private Sector Is Now...