General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDid Leonard Nimoy Have Antonin Scalia Killed to Give Obama Enough Supreme Court Votes
The news wires are heating up with the very polished press release about Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalias tragically untimely death. The man, considered one of the greatest heroes of Constitutional law in both the 20th and 21st centuries, could not have left America at a more crucial moment. Yet there are already rumors that this passing is a bit too convenient for the Obama White House just as Hillary Clintons campaign is stumbling.
One major issue for Clinton is that her email scandal threatens to completely derail her candidacy. According to numerous insiders, the Republicans are holding back the most damning information until she is actually chosen as the Democratic nominee. At that point, they will release reams of documents implicating her in a host of federal crimes. In such a scenario, the FBI would be forced to indict the former Secretary of State. These complications would assuredly give the Republican presidential candidate the inside track on taking back the Oval Office.
***snip***
Nimoys Hand in the Assassination
The wild card in this equation is likely Leonard Nimoy, who various leaked reports have identified as the newest leader of the Illuminati. While there is much debate about that secretive groups ultimate motives, many citizen journalists suspect that they are expanding their control through both European-style socialism and Bilderberg-group branded international cooperation schemes. The recent Climate Change summit is the perfect example of this, as it gives foreign authorities the power to override both Congressional and Constitutional protections. As many know, the presence of the United Nations on American soil will lead to gun seizures and restrictions on Christian freedom of speech.
Illuminati supporters such as gun control activists, marijuana propagandists and the recruiters of sodomy are likely to immediately benefit from the Justices death. They will now have more room to promote their disturbing agendas on a national legal front.
I, for one, think this article speaks for itself.
LOL
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)JFKDem62
(383 posts)Explains everything.
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)JFKDem62
(383 posts)They sure like Ferengi to me.
Lancero
(3,003 posts)Initech
(100,068 posts)Chichiri
(4,667 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)The other titles listed are equally over the top.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Oneironaut
(5,494 posts)I think this is a Poe who refuses to admit it.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Hekate
(90,677 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Brilliant Satire.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)That's worthy of an extra chapter in Foucault's Pendulum.
mcar
(42,316 posts)to describe how much I love this.
Liberty Belle
(9,535 posts)Unless Vulcans can come back from the dead.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)For them, it is gospel.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Both of these guys had ancestors and cronies in the slave trade.
Baron de Rothschild and Prescott Bush, share a moment and some information, back in the 1950s.
The people who tried to overthrow FDR in 1933 had kids.
And their offspring* and connected cronies in crime are the ones screwing America now. What's different today, is we don't have Smedley Butler or FDR to stop them.
Of course, it's not just a few rich families's offspring who screw the majority today. They've hired help and built up the giant noise machine to continue their work overthrowing the progress FDR and the New Deal brought America for 80 years.
Why would the nation and world's richest people do that? Progress costs money. And they don't want to pay for it, even when they've gained more wealth than all of history put together. Instead, whey continue to work -- legally, through government and lobbyists -- to amass even more, transferring the wealth of the many to themselves.
And instead of an armed mob led by a war hero on a white horse, as planned in 1933, their weapon since Pruneface made his first payment to the Ayatollah has been "Supply Side Economics." To most Americans, that means Trickle-Down.
Rothschild and Freshfields founders had links to slavery, papers reveal
By Carola Hoyos
Financial Times
Two of the biggest names in the City of London had previously undisclosed links to slavery in the British colonies, documents seen by the Financial Times have revealed.
Nathan Mayer Rothschild, the banking familys 19th-century patriarch, and James William Freshfield, founder of Freshfields, the top City law firm, benefited financially from slavery, records from the National Archives show, even though both have often been portrayed as opponents of slavery.
Far from being a matter of distant history, slavery remains a highly contentious issue in the US, where Rothschild and Freshfields are both active.
Companies alleged to have links to past slave injustices have come under pressure to make restitution.
JPMorgan, the investment bank, set up a $5m scholarship fund for black students studying in Louisiana after apologising in 2005 for the companys historic links to slavery.
CONTINUED (with registration, etc) ...
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7c0f5014-628c-11de-b1c9-00144feabdc0.html
Generation upon generation, knowing only service to power and property.
Kevin Phillips called them a ''multigenerational family of fibbers.''
The Barreling Bushes
Four generations of the dynasty have chased profits through cozy ties with Mideast leaders, spinning webs of conflicts of interest
by Kevin Phillips
Published on Sunday, January 11, 2004 by the Los Angeles Times
EXCERPT...
During these years, Bush's four sons - George W., Jeb, Neil and Marvin - were following in the family footsteps, lining up business deals with Saudi, Kuwaiti and Bahraini moneymen and cozying up to BCCI. The Middle East was becoming a convenient family money spigot.
Eldest son George W. Bush made his first Middle East connection in the late 1970s with James Bath, a Texas businessmen who served as the North American representative for two rich Saudis (and Osama bin Laden relatives) - billionaire Salem bin Laden and banker and BCCI insider Khalid bin Mahfouz. Bath put $50,000 into Bush's 1979 Arbusto oil partnership, probably using Bin Laden-Bin Mahfouz funds.
In the late 1980s, after several failed oil ventures, the future 43rd president let the ailing oil business in which he was a major stockholder and chairman be bought out by another foreign-influenced operation, Harken Energy. The Wall Street Journal commented in 1991, "The mosaic of BCCI connections surrounding Harken Energy may prove nothing more than how ubiquitous the rogue bank's ties were. But the number of BCCI-connected people who had dealings with Harken - all since George W. Bush came on board - likewise raises the question of whether they mask an effort to cozy up to a presidential son."
Other hints of cronyism came in 1990 when inexperienced Harken got a major contract to drill in the Persian Gulf for the government of Bahrain. Time magazine reporters Jonathan Beaty and S.C. Gwynne, in their book "The Outlaw Bank," concluded "that Mahfouz, or other BCCI players, must have had a hand in steering the oil-drilling contract to the president's son." The web entangling the Bush presidencies was already being spun.
CONTINUED...
http://faculty.plts.edu/gpence/html/kevin_phillips.htm
Of course, most people have never heard of the BFEE or Illuminati. I do not know, thanks to Secret Government and secret banking, what the extend of their holdings and/or powers are. I do know that while we wonder about whether they exist or not, the rich get richer and their wars without end mean profits without cease.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Some, however, insist on believing that unicorns fly with rainbow farts.
For them, it is gospel.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)I'm talking about something that is more than belief. Consider IBM and its role in the Holocaust.
It's why I don't ridicule people with ideas different than mine. If I did, I might not learn something important.