Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUtah Senate votes to repeal 17th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (with video)
Utah Senate votes to repeal 17th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (with video)
The Utah Senate on Wednesday called on Congress to repeal the 17th Amendment so that state senators could again select U.S. senators.
It voted 20-6 to pass SJR2, and sent it to the House. It calls for Congress to repeal the 17th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which was ratified in 1913 to allow people to directly elect U.S. senators.
Its sponsor, Sen. Al Jackson, R-Highland, says electing senators by the state Senate is needed because no branch of the federal government now represents the needs of state governments. A change would force senators to do that.
"Today, senators are more beholden to special interest groups than to their states" because those interests give them money for reelection, Jackson said.
http://www.sltrib.com/news/3576711-155/utah-senate-votes-to-repeal-17th
The Utah Senate on Wednesday called on Congress to repeal the 17th Amendment so that state senators could again select U.S. senators.
It voted 20-6 to pass SJR2, and sent it to the House. It calls for Congress to repeal the 17th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which was ratified in 1913 to allow people to directly elect U.S. senators.
Its sponsor, Sen. Al Jackson, R-Highland, says electing senators by the state Senate is needed because no branch of the federal government now represents the needs of state governments. A change would force senators to do that.
"Today, senators are more beholden to special interest groups than to their states" because those interests give them money for reelection, Jackson said.
Overlooking the obvious political motivations, it does bring up an interesting question to debate:
Should U.S. Senators represent their state or the people of their state?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1028 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Utah Senate votes to repeal 17th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (with video) (Original Post)
sarisataka
Feb 2016
OP
Beowulf
(761 posts)1. The Princeton Study showed
no federally elected official represents the people who elected them. They work for the powerful.
rurallib
(62,414 posts)4. and that there is the true bottom line folks
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)2. State Governments are people now too????????
Its sponsor, Sen. Al Jackson, R-Highland, says electing senators by the state Senate is needed because no branch of the federal government now represents the needs of state governments. A change would force senators to do that.
Sen Jackson is an Orwellian anti democracy wankpuffin.
LonePirate
(13,420 posts)3. More Republican lies wrapped up in populist bullshit.
The UT legislature (and Republicans in general) want the 17th Amendment repealed because citizens of red (MO) and swing states (FL) keep electing Democrats to the Senate. Repealing the 17th allows these Republican legislatures to stack the Senate with Republicans. This interests of state government spiel is bullshit.