Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAmerican Exceptionalism to the Rescue
U.S. Secretary of War Leon Panetta is making a tour of the Asia-Pacific where he is pumping up the next military conflict. Yesterday I heard he was in Vietnam trying to close a deal to allow the U.S. Navy to once again have access to the base at Cam Ranh Bay.
Before leaving on this trip Panetta made the speaking rounds back home to consolidate U.S. media and build public support for Obama's "pivot" into the Asia-Pacific. "One of the key projects that your generation will have to face is sustaining and enhancing American strength across the great maritime region of the Pacific," he told graduates of U.S. Naval Academy at Annapolis, Maryland last week.
"China's military is growing and modernizing. We must be vigilant. We must be strong. We must be prepared to confront any challenge," Panetta said.
While in Singapore Panetta stated, "By 2020, the Navy will re-posture its forces from today's roughly 50/50 percent split between the Pacific and the Atlantic to about a 60/40 split between those oceans. That will include six aircraft carriers in this region, a majority of our cruisers, destroyers, littoral combat ships, and submarines....to project power and operate in the Asia-Pacific."
He told an audience of Asian military officials that the U.S. planned new investments in capabilities needed "to project power and operate in the Asia-Pacific," including radar-evading fighter jets, a new long-distance bomber, electronic warfare and missile defenses. The message to them is essentially - play along with us and we will share a piece of the action with you.
Before leaving on this trip Panetta made the speaking rounds back home to consolidate U.S. media and build public support for Obama's "pivot" into the Asia-Pacific. "One of the key projects that your generation will have to face is sustaining and enhancing American strength across the great maritime region of the Pacific," he told graduates of U.S. Naval Academy at Annapolis, Maryland last week.
"China's military is growing and modernizing. We must be vigilant. We must be strong. We must be prepared to confront any challenge," Panetta said.
While in Singapore Panetta stated, "By 2020, the Navy will re-posture its forces from today's roughly 50/50 percent split between the Pacific and the Atlantic to about a 60/40 split between those oceans. That will include six aircraft carriers in this region, a majority of our cruisers, destroyers, littoral combat ships, and submarines....to project power and operate in the Asia-Pacific."
He told an audience of Asian military officials that the U.S. planned new investments in capabilities needed "to project power and operate in the Asia-Pacific," including radar-evading fighter jets, a new long-distance bomber, electronic warfare and missile defenses. The message to them is essentially - play along with us and we will share a piece of the action with you.
Read more: http://www.opednews.com/articles/American-Exceptionalism-to-by-Bruce-K-Gagnon-120604-53.html
So, more money is being wasted and more antagonism is being created for what beneficial reason(s)?
At a time when the US is being more indebted without any solution and when anti-US sentiment seems to be increasing, a larger US military presence in Asia is necessary?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1096 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
American Exceptionalism to the Rescue (Original Post)
The Northerner
Jun 2012
OP
Exactly. The Deprtment of War was renamed in 1947. Let's try to be a little more current with our
FSogol
Jun 2012
#2
In fairness to the OP, the phrase 'Secretary of War' comes from the source material and
coalition_unwilling
Jun 2012
#3
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)1. "U.S. Secretary of War Leon Panetta ..."
If you have to change the title of the person ... there is no reason to read further.
Just another attempt to discourage Dems and get them to stay home.
FSogol
(45,484 posts)2. Exactly. The Deprtment of War was renamed in 1947. Let's try to be a little more current with our
"reporting."
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)3. In fairness to the OP, the phrase 'Secretary of War' comes from the source material and
presumably is not the OP's words.
Although the OP did post the snippet, I'm not sure how much responsibility he or she bears for errors contained within the source material.
FSogol
(45,484 posts)4. In fairness to the OP, it is just more over-the-top Obama bashing rhetoric.
Different strokes for different folks I guess.