Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 02:18 AM Feb 2016

Republican superdelegates

I thought this was a pretty good write-up

http://www.bustle.com/articles/141611-does-the-gop-have-superdelegates-the-republican-partys-nomination-rules-are-different-this-year

The GOP, however, has decided to establish fewer superdelegates than the Democrats. In the Republican Party, the only people who get superdelegate status are the three members of each state’s national party. This means that in the GOP, superdelegates are only about 7 percent of the total number of delegates.

The more important distinction, though, is that Republican superdelegates do not have the freedom to vote for whichever candidate they please. The national Republican Party ruled in 2015 that their superdelegates must vote for the candidate that their state voted for, and that’s the biggest difference between Republican and Democratic superdelegates.

In general, superdelegates are a way for the party elite to exert additional influence over the nomination process. If voters were on the verge of nominating a candidate who the party felt didn’t have a good shot at winning the general election, the superdelegates might step in and tip the scales.

That could conceivably happen this year on the Democratic side. However, it’s simply not possible for Republican superdelegates to override the wishes of Republican voters. Thanks to the rules the national GOP has established, Republican “superdelegates” aren’t very “super” at all.


Interestingly, this still can actual "distort" the vote, because it gives smaller states proportionally more say in the nomination process.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Republican superdelegates (Original Post) Recursion Feb 2016 OP
So, the Republicans are more democratic than the Democrats? Wounded Bear Feb 2016 #1
Looks like it. I mean the names are kind of silly to begin with Recursion Feb 2016 #2

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
2. Looks like it. I mean the names are kind of silly to begin with
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 02:32 AM
Feb 2016

I don't know anybody seriously pursuing a monarchy, so we're all "republicans", and I don't know of anybody who denies that the just authority of a government comes from the consent of the governed, so we're all "democrats".

It's like the old Catholic Encyclopedia entry on the Orthodox church that pointed out that all religions consider themselves both "catholic" with a small "c" and "orthodox" with a small "o".

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Republican superdelegates