Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 02:41 PM Feb 2016

WaPo: "It’s time to start speculating about Donald Trump’s vice presidential pick"

In this column, Chris Cillizza offers his thoughts about whom Trump might select as a running mate. Trump doesn't have the nomination locked up yet, but he's clearly the front-runner, so it's a question worth asking.

At one point, I thought a Trump/Cruz ticket was a good chance. Cillizza rules it out on the basis of the strong enmity that's developed between the two. It would certainly be a "team" with some teamwork problems, but picking a rival isn't unheard of. Reagan picked George H.W. Bush after the latter had (correctly) derided his "voodoo economics" proposals. Still, Trump/Cruz is looking unlikely.

The prospects Cillizza mentions ("in no particular order&quot are: Nikki Haley, Rick Scott, Sarah Palin, Carly Fiorina, and a businessman to be named later (someone like Carl Icahn or Jack Welch). On that last point, Cillizza comments:

Picking someone who has never been involved in politics before would bolster Trump's basic message that politicians don't know what the hell they are doing. It also might be slightly risky since, well, someone who has never run for or been in office before wouldn't have much of a clue about how the whole system works in the event Trump actually got elected president.


From a conventional point of view, either Kasich or Rubio would address that experience issue, by bringing on board someone who'd served in elective office, and either would also help in a key swing state. Of course, to pick anyone who'd served in elective office might undercut Trump's outsider appeal. One of the commenters suggests that Trump pick a general; that might be a way of adding experience without resorting to a politician. Too bad for Petraeus he couldn't keep his pants zipped.

Another commenter suggests Susana Martinez. IMO that idea makes more sense than Haley -- if you're going to pick a youngish female governor, might as well try to appeal to Latinos rather than Indian-Americans, and might as well go for a swing state.

Here are a couple other ideas, trying to walk the line between adding experience and not looking like a conventional politician:
* Joe Scarborough -- practiced law, then served in Congress but that was a while back, has made a successful third career in media, good name recognition, accustomed to being on camera, Floridian, nobody but a few diehard leftists would worry about the "dead intern" story.
* Gary Johnson -- successful businessman, then won two terms as Governor of New Mexico to give him the experience to complement Trump, but not a conventional Republican politician because he ran as the Libertarian candidate in 2012 and got more than a million votes.

OK, I know no one wants to contemplate the prospect of President Trump, but he could well be the nominee and he'll have to pick someone to run with him. Go ahead and speculate.
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WaPo: "It’s time to start speculating about Donald Trump’s vice presidential pick" (Original Post) Jim Lane Feb 2016 OP
Christie endorsed him today. I assume he's hoping for the VP spot. OregonBlue Feb 2016 #1
I don't see Chistie as a second banana. More likely Attorney Gen and/or SCOTUS onenote Feb 2016 #5
I agree. Christie doesn't even help him in New Jersey. Jim Lane Feb 2016 #10
I think he would find a Woman POC if he could, there might be one or two that randys1 Feb 2016 #2
Omarosa? She did work in the Clinton White House! bullwinkle428 Feb 2016 #4
I'm sure he could find someone with more ambition than principles. Jim Lane Feb 2016 #8
I don't see Rubio exboyfil Feb 2016 #3
After what Trump had to say about Fiorina, can't see her as his VP choice onenote Feb 2016 #7
Dennis Rodman! Gary Busey! Omarosa! FSogol Feb 2016 #6
Tonald Drump. Tommy_Carcetti Feb 2016 #9
Martinez is severely damaged 0rganism Feb 2016 #11
Puppymonkeybaby. moondust Feb 2016 #12

OregonBlue

(7,754 posts)
1. Christie endorsed him today. I assume he's hoping for the VP spot.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 02:45 PM
Feb 2016

Can you imagine two loud mouthed bombasts? They do nothing but shout each other down.

onenote

(42,700 posts)
5. I don't see Chistie as a second banana. More likely Attorney Gen and/or SCOTUS
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 02:58 PM
Feb 2016

Last edited Fri Feb 26, 2016, 04:07 PM - Edit history (1)

He wants to be the prosecutor in chief.

Plus, he adds no diversity, geographic or otherwise, to a Trump ticket.

Definitely not VP.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
10. I agree. Christie doesn't even help him in New Jersey.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 04:06 PM
Feb 2016

Well, he might sway some New Jersey voters who'd see it as a way to get Christie out of the governorship a year early. But given Christie's low approval ratings, picking him wouldn't put New Jersey in play. He also wouldn't help reconcile the paleocons to the ticket, because they consider Christie a RINO.

Plus, as you say, Christie has no other electoral advantages and is the wrong temperament to be a VP.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
2. I think he would find a Woman POC if he could, there might be one or two that
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 02:46 PM
Feb 2016

would sign on to his hate agenda.

If the GOP steals the election (they cant actually win, they can only obtain the WH by stealing), and they will prevent millions of democrats from voting in that pursuit, I dont know which worry will be greater; how fast the middle class will disappear and the poor starve to death, or which foreign war will he start accidentally by shooting his ignorant mouth off.

Remember, Donald Trump is only important and rich because he was and is willing to harm people and cheat people to make money.

He is the epitome of capitalism.

bullwinkle428

(20,629 posts)
4. Omarosa? She did work in the Clinton White House!
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 02:58 PM
Feb 2016

:trumpvoice: "SHE KNOWS WHEA THE BODIES AH BURIED!"

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
8. I'm sure he could find someone with more ambition than principles.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 03:58 PM
Feb 2016

I'd guess that either Haley or Martinez would take it if offered.

Haley has endorsed Rubio so picking her could be seen as a way of bridging the intra-party divisions. I don't know whether Martinez has made an endorsement.

exboyfil

(17,862 posts)
3. I don't see Rubio
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 02:53 PM
Feb 2016

Kasich definitely along with any other Republican governor/former governor. Given Kasich's legislative experience, he probably would also be useful in that regard.

I have been thinking all along that Kasich is running for the VP spot. He has tried to keep his hands clean during these debates.

He helps in the midwest especially Ohio.

Apparently Christie has thrown his hat into the ring for the VP. I don't think he would help as much as Kasich though.

If you stay with the outsider theme perhaps Fiorina.

I guess it won't be Jeb.

onenote

(42,700 posts)
7. After what Trump had to say about Fiorina, can't see her as his VP choice
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 03:02 PM
Feb 2016

Kasich? Possibly.
Haley? Not out of the question.
Someone we haven't thought of? Wouldn't be a surprise if it was a surprise.

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,181 posts)
9. Tonald Drump.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 04:02 PM
Feb 2016

Who will look an awful like Donald Trump, except he wears a pair of dark rimmed glasses, a large nose and a fuzzy Groucho Marx style moustache.

The two will never be seen on stage together, ever.

0rganism

(23,944 posts)
11. Martinez is severely damaged
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 04:10 PM
Feb 2016

her weird loud party thing and yelling shit at the police would play well in opposition campaign ads...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WaPo: "It’s time to start...